Reproducible Feature Selection for High-Dimensional Measurement Error Models

References

• Agarwal A, Shah D, Shen D, Song D (2021) On robustness of principal component regression. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 116(536):1731–1745.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber RF, Candès EJ (2015) Controlling the false discovery rate via knockoffs. Ann. Statist. 43(5):2055–2085.Google Scholar
• Barber RF, Candès EJ (2019) A knockoff filter for high-dimensional selective inference. Ann. Statist. 47(5):2504–2537.Google Scholar
• Barber RF, Candès EJ, Samworth RJ (2020) Robust inference with knockoffs. Ann. Statist. 48(3):1409–1431.Google Scholar
• Bastani H, Bayati M (2020) Online decision making with high-dimensional covariates. Oper. Res. 68(1):276–294.Link, Google Scholar
• Bates S, Candès EJ, Janson L, Wang W (2021) Metropolized knockoff sampling. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 116(535):1413–1427.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belloni A, Chernozhukov V, Kaul A (2017) Confidence bands for coefficients in high dimensional linear models with error-in-variables. Preprint, submitted March 1, https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00469.Google Scholar
• Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 57(1):289–300.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrd M, McGee M (2019) A simple correction procedure for high-dimensional generalized linear models with measurement error. Preprint, submitted December 26, https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11740.Google Scholar
• Cai T, Liu W, Luo X (2011) A constrained ℓ1 minimization approach to sparse precision matrix estimation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 106(494):594–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Candès EJ, Fan Y, Janson L, Lv J (2018) Panning for gold: ‘Model-X’ knockoffs for high-dimensional controlled variable selection. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 80(3):551–577.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Sun X, Yao Y (2024) Controlling the false discovery rate in transformational sparsity: Split knockoffs. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 86(2):386–410.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng Y, Wang X, Xia Y (2021) Supervised t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding for data visualization and classification. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 111(2):394–406.Google Scholar
• Chudik A, Kapetanios G, Pesaran H (2018) A one covariate at a time, multiple testing approach to variable selection in high-dimensional linear regression models. Econometrica 86(4):1479–1512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta A, Zou H (2017) CoCoLasso for high-dimensional error-in-variables regression. Ann. Statist. 45(6):2400–2426.Google Scholar
• Duchi J, Shalev-Shwartz S, Singer Y, Chandra T (2008) Efficient projections onto the ℓ1-ball for learning in high dimensions. McCallum A, Roweis S, eds. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 272–279.Google Scholar
• Fan J, Lv J (2008) Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 70(5):849–911.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Lv J (2016) Innovated scalable efficient estimation in ultra-large Gaussian graphical models. Ann. Statist. 44(5):2098–2126.Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Demirkaya E, Lv J (2019) Nonuniformity of p-values can occur early in diverging dimensions. J. Machine Learn. Res. 20(77):1–33.Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Gao L, Lv J (2024) ARK: Robust knockoffs inference with coupling. Preprint, submitted June 4, https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04400.Google Scholar
• Fan J, Han X, Gu W (2012) Control of the false discovery rate under arbitrary covariance dependence (with discussion). J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 107(499):1019–1045.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Demirkaya E, Li G, Lv J (2020a) RANK: Large-scale inference with graphical nonlinear knockoffs. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 115(529):362–379.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Lv J, Sharifvaghefi M, Uematsu Y (2020b) IPAD: Stable interpretable forecasting with knockoffs inference. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 115(532):1822–1834.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2008) Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 9(3):432–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang N, Mojumder P, Sun T, Lv J, Golden JM (2021) Not registered? Please sign-up first: A randomized field experiment on the ex-ante registration request. Inform. Systems Res. 32(3):914–931.Link, Google Scholar
• Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, Speed TP (2003) Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4(2):249–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jayachandran S, Sharma S, Kaufman P, Raman P (2005) The role of relational information processes and technology use in customer relationship management. J. Marketing 69(4):177–192.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiang F, Zhou Y, Liu J, Ma Y (2023) On high-dimensional Poisson models with measurement error: Hypothesis testing for nonlinear nonconvex optimization. Ann. Statist. 51(1):233–259.Google Scholar
• Kallus N, Mao X, Udell M (2018) Causal inference with noisy and missing covariates via matrix factorization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 31 (Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook, NY), 6921–6932.Google Scholar
• Li M, Li R, Ma Y (2021) Inference in high-dimensional linear measurement error models. J. Multivariate Anal. 184:104759.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liang H, Li R (2009) Variable selection for partially linear models with measurement errors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 104(485):234–248.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loh PL, Tan LX (2018) High-dimensional robust precision matrix estimation: Cellwise corruption under ϵ-contamination. Electronic J. Statist. 12(1):1429–1467.Google Scholar
• Loh PL, Wainwright MJ (2012) High-dimensional regression with noisy and missing data: Provable guarantees with non-convexity. Ann. Statist. 40(3):1637–1664.Google Scholar
• Paulson C, Luo L, James GM (2018) Efficient large-scale internet media selection optimization for online display advertising. J. Marketing Res. 55(4):489–506.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravikumar P, Wainwright MJ, Raskutti G, Yu B (2011) High-dimensional covariance estimation by minimizing ℓ1-penalized log-determinant divergence. Electronic J. Statist. 5:935–980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reppe S, Refvem H, Gautvik VT, Olstad OK, Høvring PI, Reinholt FP, Holden M, Frigessi A, Jemtland R, Gautvik KM (2010) Eight genes are highly associated with BMD variation in postmenopausal Caucasian women. Bone 46(3):604–612.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rocke DM, Durbin B (2001) A model for measurement error for gene expression arrays. J. Comput. Biol. 8(6):557–569.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Romano Y, Sesia M, Candès E (2020) Deep knockoffs. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 115(532):1861–1872.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen Ø, Frigessi A, Thoresen M (2015) Measurement error in lasso: Impact and likelihood bias correction. Statist. Sinica 25(2):809–829.Google Scholar
• Sørensen Ø, Hellton KH, Frigessi A, Thoresen M (2018) Covariate selection in high-dimensional generalized linear models with measurement error. J. Comput. Graph. Statist. 27(4):739–749.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sui C, Wen H, Han J, Chen T, Gao Y, Wang Y, Yang L, Guo L (2023) Decreased gray matter volume in the right middle temporal gyrus associated with cognitive dysfunction in preeclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension. Frontiers Neurosci. 17:1138952.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang CY, Fan Y, Kong Y (2020) Precision matrix estimation by inverse principal orthogonal decomposition. Commun. Math. Res. 36(1):68–92.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uematsu Y, Tanaka S (2019) High-dimensional macroeconomic forecasting and variable selection via penalized regression. Econom. J. 22(1):34–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• van de Geer S, Bühlmann P, Ritov YA, Dezeure R (2014) On asymptotically optimal confidence regions and tests for high-dimensional models. Ann. Statist. 42(3):1166–1202.Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Xue L (2019) Inference for high dimensional linear models with error-in-variables. Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 13(1):1–10.Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Wang J, Balakrishnan S, Singh A (2019) Rate optimal estimation and confidence intervals for high-dimensional regression with missing covariates. J. Multivariate Anal. 174:104526.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiner MW, Veitch DP, Aisen PS, Beckett LA, Cairns NJ, Green RC, Harvey D, et al. (2017) The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 3: Continued innovation for clinical trial improvement. Alzheimer’s Dementia 13(5):561–571.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang M, Adomavicius G, Burtch G, Ren Y (2018) Mind the gap: Accounting for measurement error and misclassification in variables generated via data mining. Inform. Systems Res. 29(1):4–24.Link, Google Scholar
• Yuan M (2010) High dimensional inverse covariance matrix estimation via linear programming. J. Machine Learn. Res. 11(79):2261–2286.Google Scholar
• Zhang CH, Zhang S (2014) Confidence intervals for low dimensional parameters in high dimensional linear models. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 76(1):217–242.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Zhou Y, Liu Y (2024) Estimation of linear functionals in high-dimensional linear models: From sparsity to nonsparsity. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 119(546):1579–1591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Lv J, Lin W (2021) Nonsparse learning with latent variables. Oper. Res. 69(1):346–359.Link, Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Li Y, Zheng Z, Wu J, Zhang J (2024) Reproducible feature selection for high-dimensional measurement error models. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1287/ijoc.2023.0282.cd, https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2023.0282.Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Iansiti M (2012) Entry into platform-based markets. Strategic Management J. 33(1):88–106.Crossref, Google Scholar