Real-Time Derivative Pricing and Hedging with Consistent Metamodels

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0292

References

  • Ankenman B, Nelson BL, Staum J (2010) Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. Oper. Res. 58:371–382.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barton RR (2015) Tutorial: Simulation metamodeling. Yilmaz L, Chan WKV, Moon I, Roeder TMK, Macal C, Rossetti MD, eds. Proc. Winter Simulation Conf. (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1765–1779.Google Scholar
  • Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econom. 81:371–382.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broadie M, Kaya O (2006) Exact simulation of stochastic volatility and other affine jump diffusion processes. Oper. Res. 54(2):217–231.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cai N, Song Y, Chen N (2017) Exact simulation of the SABR model. Oper. Res. 65(4):931–951.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen X, Ankenman B, Nelson BL (2013) Enhancing stochastic kriging metamodels with gradient estimators. Oper. Res. 61:512–528.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cioppa TM, Lucas TW (2007) Efficient nearly orthogonal and space-filling latin hypercubes. Technometrics 49(1):45–55.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for Spatial Data (Wiley, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cuomo S, Cola VSD, Giampaolo F, Rozza G, Raissi M, Piccialli F (2022) Scientific machine learning through physics-informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next. J. Sci. Comput. 92:88.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu MC, Hu JQ (1997) Conditional Monte Carlo: Gradient Estimation and Optimization Applications (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glasserman P (1991) Gradient Estimation via Perturbation Analysis (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA).Google Scholar
  • Glasserman P (2003) Monte Carlo Methods in Financial Engineering (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glasserman P, Heidelberger P, Shahabuddin P (1999) Asymptotically optimal importance sampling and stratification for pricing path-dependent options. Math. Finance 9:117–152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glynn PW (1990) Likelihood ratio gradient estimation for stochastic systems. Comm. ACM 33(10):75–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hong LJ, Jiang G (2019) Offline simulation online application: A new framework of simulation-based decision making. Asia-Pacific J. Oper. Res. 36(6):223–236.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horn RA, Zhang F (2005) Basic properties of the schur complement. Zhang F, ed. The Schur Complement and Its Applications (Springer, Boston), 17–46.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hou R, Lu L (2018) miMLHD: Generate the optimal Latin Hypercube Design based on the miniMax criterion. https://search.r-project.org/CRAN/refmans/MOLHD/html/MOLHD-package.html.Google Scholar
  • Jiang G, Hong LJ, Nelson BL (2020) Online risk monitoring using offline simulation. INFORMS J. Comput. 32(2):356–375.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang G, Hong LJ, Shen H (2024) Simulation metamodel-based prediction for real-time derivative pricing and risk management. https://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0292.cd, https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2023.0292.Google Scholar
  • Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J. Global Optim. 13:455–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karniadakis GE, Kevrekidis LG, Lu L, Perdikari P, Wang S, Yang L (2021) Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Nature Rev. Physics 3:422–440.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kemma AGZ, Vorst ACF (1990) A pricing method for options based on average asset values. J. Bank. Finance 14:113–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu G, Hong LJ (2011) Kernel estimation of the Greeks for options with discontinuous payoffs. Oper. Res. 59(1):96–108.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liu H, Liang L, Lee LH, Chew EP (2022) Unifying offline and online simulation for online decision-making. IISE Trans. 54(10):923–935.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loeppky JL, Sachs J, Welch WJ (2009) Choosing the sample size of a computer experiment: A practical guide. Technometrics 51:366–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morris MD, Mitchell TJ (1995) Exploratory designs for computational experiments. J. Statist. Planning Inference 43(3):381–402.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Øksendal B (2010) Stochastic Differential Equations: An Introduction with Applications (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
  • Peng YJ, Fu MC, Hu JQ, Heidergott B (2018) A new unbiased stochastic derivative estimator for discontinuous sample performances with structural parameters. Oper. Res. 66(2):487–499.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Qu H, Fu MC (2014) Gradient extrapolated stochastic kriging. ACM Trans. Modeling Comput. Simulation 24:23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis GE (2019) Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 378:686–707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rasmussen C, Williams C (2006) Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Schoutens W (2003) Lévy Processes in Finance: Pricing Financial Derivatives (John Wiley Sons, Chichester, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shen H, Hong LJ, Zhang X (2018) Enhancing stochastic kriging for queueing simulation with stylized models. IISE Trans. 50(11):943–958.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shen H, Hong LJ, Zhang X (2021) Ranking and selection with covariates for personalized decision making. INFORMS J. Comput. 32(2):356–375.Google Scholar
  • van Beers WCM, Kleijnen JPC (2003) Kriging for interpolation in random simulation. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 54:255–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang S, Teng Y, Perdikaris P (2021) Understanding and mitigating gradient flow pathologies in physics-informed neural networks. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 43(5):3055–3081.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ye KQ (1998) Orthogonal column latin hypercubes and their application in computer experiments. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 93(444):1430–1439.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zenios SA (1999) High-performance computing in finance: The last 10 years and the next. Parallel Comput. 25:2149–2175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.