Demands Satiated or Not? A Psychology-Informed Deep Probabilistic Approach to Offline Store Recommendations
Published Online:17 Oct 2025https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0403
References
- (2005) A multipurpose shopping trip model to assess retail agglomeration effects. J. Marketing Res. 42(1):109–115.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2007) Satiation in discounted utility. Oper. Res. 55(1):170–181.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Next-generation information systems theorizing: A call to action. MIS Quart. 45(1):301–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder–decoder for statistical machine translation. Moschitti A, Pang B, Daelemans W, eds. Proc. 2014 Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA), 1724–1734.Google Scholar
- (2015) Learning user real-time intent for optimal dynamic web page transformation. Inform. Systems Res. 26(2):339–359.Link, Google Scholar
- (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley Series in Social Psychology (Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, MA).Google Scholar
- (2013) Slow down! Insensitivity to rate of consumption leads to avoidable satiation. J. Consumer Res. 39(5):993–1009.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2014) How perceptions of temporal distance influence satiation. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 52:118–123.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) Mobile targeting using customer trajectory patterns. Management Sci. 65(11):5027–5049.Link, Google Scholar
- (2024) Shopping trip recommendations: A novel deep learning-enhanced global planning approach. Decision Support Systems 182:114238.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Cost-effective social media influencer marketing. INFORMS J. Comput. 35(1):138–157.Link, Google Scholar
- (2019) Mobile app recommendation: An involvement-enhanced approach. MIS Quart. 43(3):827–849.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2025) Demands satiated or not? A psychology-informed deep probabilistic approach to offline store recommendations. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0403.cd, https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2023.0403.Google Scholar
- (2016) Session-based recommendations with recurrent neural networks. Proc. 4th Internat. Conf. Learn. Representations (ICLR, Appleton, WI), 1–10.Google Scholar
- (2022) CORE: Simple and effective session-based recommendation within consistent representation space. Proc. 45th Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1796–1801.Google Scholar
- (2013) FISM: Factored item similarity models for top-N recommender systems. Ghani R, Senator TE, Bradley P, Parekh R, He J, eds. Proc. 19th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 659–667.Google Scholar
- (2018) Self-attentive sequential recommendation. 2018 IEEE Internat. Conf. Data Mining (ICDM) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 197–206.Google Scholar
- (2015) Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Proc. 3rd Internat. Conf. Learn. Representations (ICLR, Appleton, WI), 1–15.Google Scholar
- (2009) Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques, Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2023) When variety seeking meets unexpectedness: Incorporating variety-seeking behaviors into design of unexpected recommender systems. Inform. Systems Res. 35(3):1257–1273.Link, Google Scholar
- (2017) A social route recommender mechanism for store shopping support. Decision Support Systems 94:97–108.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Multicriterion market segmentation: A new model, implementation, and evaluation. Marketing Sci. 29(5):880–894.Link, Google Scholar
- (2018) Evaluation of session-based recommendation algorithms. User Model. User-Adapted Interaction 28:331–390.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2003) Buying, searching, or browsing: Differentiating between online shoppers using in-store navigational clickstream. J. Consumer Psych. 13(1–2):29–39.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Interrupted consumption: Disrupting adaptation to hedonic experiences. J. Marketing Res. 45(6):654–664.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) The moderating role of emotional differentiation on satiation. J. Consumer Psych. 22(4):507–519.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1980) Optimum stimulation level: Its relationship to personality, demographics, and exploratory behavior. J. Consumer Res. 7(3):272–282.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) Reducing satiation: The role of categorization level. J. Consumer Res. 34(5):624–634.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Factorizing personalized Markov chains for next-basket recommendation. Proc. 19th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 811–820.Google Scholar
- (2019) Variety seeking, satiation, and maximizing enjoyment over time. J. Consumer Psych. 29(1):89–103.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) State-sharing sparse hidden Markov models for personalized sequences. Proc. 25th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1549–1559.Google Scholar
- (2019) When and how to diversify—A multicategory utility model for personalized content recommendation. Management Sci. 65(8):3737–3757.Link, Google Scholar
- (1992) The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer behavior. J. Consumer Res. 19(3):434–448.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1996) The relationships among arousal potential, arousal and stimulus evaluation, and the moderating role of need for stimulation. Internat. J. Res. Marketing 13(4):319–329.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2019) BERT4Rec: Sequential recommendation with bidirectional encoder representations from transformer. Proc. 28th ACM Internat. Conf. Inform. Knowledge Management (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1441–1450.Google Scholar
- (2020) Are we evaluating rigorously? Benchmarking recommendation for reproducible evaluation and fair comparison. Proc. 14th ACM Conf. Recommender Systems (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 23–32.Google Scholar
- (2022) Inductive representation learning on dynamic stock co-movement graphs for stock predictions. INFORMS J. Comput. 34(4):1940–1957.Link, Google Scholar
- (2008) Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping–Updated and Revised for the Internet, the Global Consumer, and Beyond (Simon & Schuster, New York).Google Scholar
- (1996) Why switch? Product category: Level explanations for true variety-seeking behavior. J. Marketing Res. 33(3):281–292.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2021) A survey on session-based recommender systems. ACM Comput. Surveys 54(7):1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2023) Dynamic Bayesian network–based product recommendation considering consumers’ multistage shopping journeys: A marketing funnel perspective. Inform. Systems Res. 35(3):1382–1402.Link, Google Scholar
- (2023) Modeling and predicting user preferences with multiple item attributes for sequential recommendations. Knowledge-Based Systems 260:110174.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2022) Diversity preference-aware link recommendation for online social networks. Inform. Systems Res. 34(4):1398–1414.Link, Google Scholar
- (2021) Location-aware real-time recommender systems for brick-and-mortar retailers. INFORMS J. Comput. 33(4):1608–1623.Abstract, Google Scholar

