Integrating Users’ Contextual Engagements with Their General Preferences: An Interpretable Followee Recommendation Method

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.1284

References

  • Adomavicius G, Bauman K, Tuzhilin A, Unger M (2022) Context-aware recommender systems: From foundations to recent developments. Ricci F, Rokach L, Shapira B, eds. Recommender Systems Handbook (Springer, New York), 211–250.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armentano MG, Godoy D, Amandi AA (2011) A topology-based approach for followees recommendation in Twitter. Proc. 9th IJCAI Workshop on Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization and Recommender Systems (Springer-Verlag, Berlin), 22–29.Google Scholar
  • Attfield S, Kazai G, Lalmas M, Piwowarski B (2011) Toward a science of user engagement. Proc. WSDM Workshop on User Modelling for Web Applications (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1–8.Google Scholar
  • Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Machine Learn. Res. 3:993–1022.Google Scholar
  • Büschken J, Allenby GM (2016) Sentence-based text analysis for customer reviews. Marketing Sci. 35(6):953–975.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Çanakoğlu E, Muter İ, Aytekin T (2021) Integrating individual and aggregate diversity in top-n recommendation. INFORMS J. Comput. 33(1):300–318.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cha Y, Cho J (2012) Social-network analysis using topic models. Proc. 35th Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Res. and Development in Inform. Retrieval (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 565–574.Google Scholar
  • Chen H, Cui X, Jin H (2016) Top-k followee recommendation over microblogging systems by exploiting diverse information sources. Future Generations Comput. Systems 55:534–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donkers B, Dellaert BG, Waisman RM, Häubl G (2020) Preference dynamics in sequential consumer choice with defaults. J. Marketing Res. 57(6):1096–1112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goel A, Gupta P, Sirois J, Wang D, Sharma A, Gurumurthy S (2015) The who-to-follow system at Twitter: Strategy, algorithms, and revenue impact. Interfaces 45(1):98–107.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • He J, Liu H, Li XD (2019) Mobile app recommendation: An involvement-enhanced approach. Management Inform. Systems Quart. 43(3):827–849.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu Y (2021) Characterizing social TV activity around televised events: A joint topic model approach. INFORMS J. Comput. 33(4):1320–1338.AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Huang Y, Jasin S, Manchanda P (2019) “Level up”: Leveraging skill and engagement to maximize player game-play in online video games. Inform. Systems Res. 30(3):927–947.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ji W, Meng X, Zhang Y (2021) Starec: Adaptive learning with apatiotemporal and activity influence for POI recommendation. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 40(4):1–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson CC (2014) Logistic matrix factorization for implicit feedback data. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems 27(78):1–9.Google Scholar
  • Kim Y, Kim K, Park C, Yu H (2019) Sequential and diverse recommendation with long tail. Proc. 28th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 2740–2746.Google Scholar
  • Koren Y (2009) Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. Proc. 15th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 447–456.Google Scholar
  • Kumar V, Pansari A (2016) Competitive advantage through engagement. J. Marketing Res. 53(4):497–514.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lagun D, Lalmas M (2016) Understanding and measuring user engagement and attention in online news reading. Proc. 9th ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 113–122.Google Scholar
  • Lee D, Hosanagar K, Nair HS (2018) Advertising content and consumer engagement on social media: Evidence from Facebook. Management Sci. 64(11):5105–5131.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li L, Peng W, Kataria S, Sun T, Li T (2013) FRec: A novel framework of recommending users and communities in social media. Proc. 22nd ACM Internat. Conf. Inform. Knowledge Management (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1765–1770.Google Scholar
  • Li S, Zhao H (2020) A survey on representation learning for user modeling. Proc. 29th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 4997–5003.Google Scholar
  • Li ZL, Fang X, Sheng ORL (2017) A survey of link recommendation for social networks: Methods, theoretical foundations, and future research directions. ACM Trans. Management Inform. Systems 9(1):1–26.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peake G, Wang J (2018) Explanation mining: Post hoc interpretability of latent factor models for recommendation systems. Proc. 24th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 2060–2069.Google Scholar
  • Pennacchiotti M, Gurumurthy S (2011) Investigating topic models for social media user recommendation. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. Companion on World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 101–102.Google Scholar
  • Ran Y, Liu J, Zhang Y (2022) Integrating users’ contextual engagements with their general preferences: An interpretable followee recommendation method Version v2021.0172 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7460938, https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2021.0172.Google Scholar
  • Rendle S, Freudenthaler C, Gantner Z, Schmidt-Thieme L (2009) BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. Proc. 25th Conf. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (AUAI Press, Arlington, VA), 452–461.Google Scholar
  • Tan C, Lee L (2015) All who wander: On the prevalence and characteristics of multi-community engagement. Proc. 24th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 1056–1066.Google Scholar
  • Wang C, Ma W, Zhang M, Chen C, Liu Y, Ma S (2020) Toward dynamic user intention: Temporal evolutionary effects of item relations in sequential recommendation. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 39(2):1–33.Google Scholar
  • Wang P, Guo J, Lan Y, Xu J, Wan S, Cheng X (2015) Learning hierarchical representation model for nextbasket recommendation. Proc. 38th Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. and Development in Information Retrieval (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 403–412.Google Scholar
  • Weng J, Lim EP, Jiang J, He Q (2010) Twitterrank: Finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. Proc. 3rd ACM Internat. Conf. Web Search Data Mining (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 261–270.Google Scholar
  • Woolley K, Sharif MA (2022) Down a rabbit hole: How prior media consumption shapes subsequent media consumption. J. Marketing Res. 59(3):453–471.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xu K, Zheng X, Cai Y, Min H, Gao Z, Zhu B, Xie H, Wong TL (2018) Improving user recommendation by extracting social topics and interest topics of users in uni-directional social networks. Knowledge Base Systems 140(15):120–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin H, Cui B, Li J, Yao J, Chen C (2012) Challenging the long tail recommendation. Proc. VLDB Endowment 5(9):896–907.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu W, Cheng W, Aggarwal CC, Chen H, Wang W (2017) Link prediction with spatial and temporal consistency in dynamic networks. Proc. 26th Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 3343–3349.Google Scholar
  • Zhang M, Wei X, Guo X, Chen G, Wei Q (2019) Identifying complements and substitutes of products: A neural network framework based on product embedding. ACM Trans. Knowledge Discovery Data 13(3):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang W, Chen Z, Zha H, Wang J (2021) Learning from substitutable and complementary relations for graph-based sequential product recommendation. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems 40(2):1–28.Google Scholar
  • Zhao G, Lee ML, Hsu W, Chen W, Hu H (2013) Community-based user recommendation in uni-directional social networks. Proc. 22nd ACM Internat. Conf. Inform. and Knowledge Management (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 189–198.Google Scholar
  • Zhou F, Zhang K, Xie S, Luo X (2020) Learning to correlate accounts across online social networks: An embedding-based approach. INFORMS J. Comput. 32(3):714–729.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.