Pairwise Stability in Weighted Network Formation Games: Selection and Computation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2024.0546

References

  • Albers S, Eilts S, Even-Dar E, Mansour Y, Roditty L (2014) On Nash equilibria for a network creation game. ACM Trans. Econom. Comput. 2(1):1–27.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allgower EL, Georg K (1990) Numerical Continuation Methods: An Introduction (Springer, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aumann RJ, Myerson RB (2003) Endogenous formation of links between players and of coalitions: An application of the Shapley value. Dutta B, Jackson MO, eds. Networks and Groups. Studies in Economic Design (Springer, Berlin), 207–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Avni G, Kupferman O, Tamir T (2016) Network-formation games with regular objectives. Inform. Comput. 251:165–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bich P, Fixary J (2022) Network formation and pairwise stability: A new oddness theorem. J. Math. Econom. 103:102767.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bich P, Morhaim L (2020) On the existence of pairwise stable weighted networks. Math. Oper. Res. 45(4):1393–1404.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bich P, Teteryatnikova M (2023) On perfect pairwise stable networks. J. Econom. Theory 207:105577.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloch F, Jackson MO (2006) Definitions of equilibrium in network formation games. Internat. J. Game Theory 34:305–318.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Borkovsky RN, Doraszelski U, Kryukov Y (2010) A user’s guide to solving dynamic stochastic games using the homotopy method. Oper. Res. 58(4-part-2):1116–1132.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bramoullé Y, Kranton R (2007) Public goods in networks. J. Econom. Theory 135(1):478–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Calvó-Armengol A, İlkılıç R (2009) Pairwise-stability and Nash equilibria in network formation. Internat. J. Game Theory 38:51–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chakrabarti S, Gilles RP (2007) Network potentials. Rev. Econom. Design 11:13–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C, Tao J, Zhan Y (2024) Pairwise stability in weighted network formation games: Selection and computation. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2024.0546.cd, https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2024.0546.Google Scholar
  • Corbo J, Parkes D (2005) The price of selfish behavior in bilateral network formation. Proc. 24th Annual ACM Sympos. Principles Distributed Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 99–107.Google Scholar
  • Dang C, Herings PJJ, Li P (2022) An interior-point differentiable path-following method to compute stationary equilibria in stochastic games. INFORMS J. Comput. 34(3):1403–1418.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eaves BC, Schmedders K (1999) General equilibrium models and homotopy methods. J. Econom. Dynam. Control 23(9–10):1249–1279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eibelshäuser S, Klockmann V, Poensgen D, von Schenk A (2023) The logarithmic stochastic tracing procedure: A homotopy method to compute stationary equilibria of stochastic games. INFORMS J. Comput. 35(6):1511–1526.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fabrikant A, Luthra A, Maneva E, Papadimitriou CH, Shenker S (2003) On a network creation game. Proc. 22nd Annual ACM Sympos. Principles Distributed Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 347–351.Google Scholar
  • Fang X, Cho SH (2014) Stability and endogenous formation of inventory transshipment networks. Oper. Res. 62(6):1316–1334.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goyal S, Joshi S (2006) Unequal connections. Internat. J. Game Theory 34:319–349.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goyal S, Moraga-Gonzalez JL (2001) R&D networks. RAND J. Econom. 32(4):686–707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harsanyi JC, Selten R (1988) A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Hellmann T (2013) On the existence and uniqueness of pairwise stable networks. Internat. J. Game Theory 42:211–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herings PJJ, Peeters R (2010) Homotopy methods to compute equilibria in game theory. Econom. Theory 42:119–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herings PJJ, Zhan Y (2024) The computation of pairwise stable networks. Math. Programming 203:443–473.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson MO (2008) Social and Economic Networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson MO, Watts A (2001) The existence of pairwise stable networks. Seoul J. Econom. 14(3):299–321.Google Scholar
  • Jackson MO, Wolinsky A (1995) A strategic model of social and economic networks. Technical report, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  • Jackson MO, Wolinsky A (1996) A strategic model of social and economic networks. J. Econom. Theory 71(1):44–74.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kupferman O, Tamir T (2017) Hierarchical network formation games. Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg), 229–246.Google Scholar
  • Leung MP (2020) Equilibrium computation in discrete network games. Quant. Econom. 11(4):1325–1347.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mantovani A, Ruiz-Aliseda F (2016) Equilibrium innovation ecosystems: The dark side of collaborating with complementors. Management Sci. 62(2):534–549.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mas-Colell A (1989) The Theory of General Economic Equilibrium: A Differentiable Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  • Mauleon A, Vannetelbosch V (2016) Network formation games. Bramoullé Y, Galeotti A, Rogers BW, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Networks (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 167–190.Google Scholar
  • Meirom EA, Mannor S, Orda A (2014) Network formation games with heterogeneous players and the Internet structure. Proc. 15th ACM Conf. Econom. Comput. (Association for Computing Machinery, New York), 735–752.Google Scholar
  • Slikker M, van den Nouweland A (2001) A one-stage model of link formation and payoff division. Games Econom. Behav. 34(1):153–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tardos E, Wexler T (2007) Network formation games and the potential function method. Nisan N, Roughgarden T, Tardos E, Vazirani VV, eds. Algorithmic Game Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 487–516.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.