Alternating Minimization for Square Root Principal Component Pursuit

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2025.1105

References

  • Beck A (2015) On the convergence of alternating minimization for convex programming with applications to iteratively reweighted least squares and decomposition schemes. SIAM J. Optim. 25(1):185–209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belloni A, Chernozhukov V, Wang L (2011) Square-root Lasso: Pivotal recovery of sparse signals via conic programming. Biometrika 98(4):791–806.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyd S, Parikh N, Chu E, Peleato B, Eckstein J (2011) Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Foundations Trends Machine Learn. 3(1):1–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burer S, Monteiro RDC (2003) A nonlinear programming algorithm for solving semidefinite programs via low-rank factorization. Math. Programming 95(2):329–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burer S, Monteiro RDC (2005) Local minima and convergence in low-rank semidefinite programming. Math. Programming 103(3):427–444.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Candès EJ, Li X, Ma Y, Wright J (2011) Robust principal component analysis? J. ACM 58(3):1–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandrasekaran V, Sanghavi S, Parrilo PA, Willsky AS (2011) Rank-sparsity incoherence for matrix decomposition. SIAM J. Optim. 21(2):572–596.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C, Chen Q, Do MN, Koltun V (2019) Seeing motion in the dark. Proc. IEEE/CVF Internat. Conf. Comput. Vision (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC), 3185–3194.Google Scholar
  • Chen Y, Fan J, Ma C, Yan Y (2021) Bridging convex and nonconvex optimization in robust PCA: Noise, outliers, and missing data. Ann. Statist. 49(5):2948–2971.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen C, He B, Ye Y, Yuan X (2016) The direct extension of ADMM for multi-block convex minimization problems is not necessarily convergent. Math. Programming 155(1):57–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Gui X, Zeng J, Zhao XL, He W (2024) Combining low-rank and deep plug-and-play priors for snapshot compressive imaging. IEEE Trans. Neural Network Learn. Systems 35(11):16396–16408.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daniilidis A, Drusvyatskiy D, Lewis AS (2014) Orthogonal invariance and identifiability. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. (Singapore) 35(2):580–598.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deng S, Li X, Zhang Y (2025) Alternating minimization for square root principal component pursuit. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2025.1105.cd, https://github.com/INFORMSJoC/2025.1105.Google Scholar
  • Gabay D, Mercier B (1976) A dual algorithm for the solution of nonlinear variational problems via finite element approximation. Computers Math. Appl. 2(1):17–40.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghadimi E, Teixeira A, Shames I, Johansson M (2014) Optimal parameter selection for the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM): Quadratic problems. IEEE Trans. Automated Control 60(3):644–658.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glowinski R, Marroco A (1975) Sur l’approximation, par éléments finis d’ordre un, et la résolution, par pénalisation-dualité d’une classe de problèmes de dirichlet non linéaires. Rev. Française D’Automatique, Inform. Rech. Opér. Anal. Numérique 9(R2):41–76.Google Scholar
  • Hu EJ, Shen Y, Wallis P, Allen-Zhu Z, Li Y, Wang S, Wang L, et al. (2021) LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. Preprint, submitted June 17, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.09685.Google Scholar
  • Klopp O, Lounici K, Tsybakov AB (2017) Robust matrix completion. Probability Theory Related Fields 169(1):523–564.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee C, Liang L, Tang T, Toh KC (2024) Accelerating nuclear-norm regulari5zed low-rank matrix optimization through Burer-Monteiro decomposition. J. Machine Learn. Res. 25(379):1–52.Google Scholar
  • Lewis AS (2002) Active sets, nonsmoothness, and sensitivity. SIAM J. Optim. 13(3):702–725.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Modi A, Chen J, Krishnamurthy A, Jiang N, Agarwal A (2024) Model-free representation learning and exploration in low-rank MDPs. J. Machine Learn. Res. 25(6):1–76.Google Scholar
  • Nesterov Y (1983) A method for solving the convex programming problem with convergence rate O(1/k2). Proc. USSR Acad. Sci. 269(3):543–547. Google Scholar
  • Nesterov Y (2013) Gradient methods for minimizing composite functions. Math. Programming 140(1):125–161.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peng J, Sun W, Li HC, Li W, Meng X, Ge C, Du Q (2021) Low-rank and sparse representation for hyperspectral image processing: A review. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sensing Magazine 10(1):10–43.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Recht B, Fazel M, Parrilo PA (2010) Guaranteed minimum-rank solutions of linear matrix equations via nuclear norm minimization. SIAM Rev. 52(3):471–501.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rennie JD, Srebro N (2005) Fast maximum margin matrix factorization for collaborative prediction. Raedt L, Wrobel S, eds. Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (ACM, New York), 713–719.Google Scholar
  • Sabach S, Teboulle M (2022) Faster Lagrangian-based methods in convex optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 32(1):204–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh DP, Joshi I, Choudhary J (2018) Survey of GPU based sorting algorithms. Internat. J. Parallel Programming 46(6):1017–1034.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Struski L, Morkisz P, Spurek P, Bernabeu SR, Trzciński T (2024) Efficient GPU implementation of randomized SVD and its applications. Expert Systems Appl. 248:123462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stucky B, Van De Geer S (2017) Sharp oracle inequalities for square root regularization. J. Machine Learn. Res. 18(67):1–29.Google Scholar
  • Sun T, Zhang CH (2012) Scaled sparse linear regression. Biometrika 99(4):879–898.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tang T, Toh KC (2024) Self-adaptive ADMM for semi-strongly convex problems. Math. Programming Comput. 16(1):113–150.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tseng P (2001) Convergence of a block coordinate descent method for nondifferentiable minimization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 109(3):475–494.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vaiter S, Peyré G, Fadili J (2018) Model consistency of partly smooth regularizers. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 64(3):1725–1737.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang J, Wang LP, Yuan SS, Li F, Liu JX, Shang JL (2023) NLRRC: A novel clustering method of jointing non-negative LRR and random walk graph regularized NMF for single-cell type identification. IEEE J. Biomedical Health Inform. 27(10):5199–5209.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wohlberg B (2017) ADMM penalty parameter selection by residual balancing. Preprint, submitted April 20, 2017, https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.06209.Google Scholar
  • Wong RK, Lee TC (2017) Matrix completion with noisy entries and outliers. J. Machine Learn. Res. 18(1):5404–5428.Google Scholar
  • Xu Y (2017) Accelerated first-order primal-dual proximal methods for linearly constrained composite convex programming. SIAM J. Optim. 27(3):1459–1484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang Y, Ma C (2023) Optimal tuning-free convex relaxation for noisy matrix completion. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 69(10):6571–6585.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang J, Yan J, Wright J (2021) Square root principal component pursuit: Tuning-free noisy robust matrix recovery. Adv. Neural Inform Processing Systems 34:29464–29475.Google Scholar
  • Zhou Z, Li X, Wright J, Candés E, Ma Y (2010) Stable principal component pursuit. Proc. IEEE Internat. Sympos. Information Theory (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1518–1522.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.