Note from the Editor

References

  • Björkman M, Holmström K (2000) Global optimization of costly nonconvex functions using radial basis functions. Optim. Engrg. 1(4):373–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chow JYJ, Regan AC, Arkhipov DI (2010) Faster converging global heuristic for continuous network design using radial basis functions. Transportation Res. Record 2196(1):102–110.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Christelis V, Regis RG, Mantoglou A (2018) Surrogate-based pumping optimization of coastal aquifers under limited computational budgets. J. Hydroinformatics 20(1):164–176.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cruz NC, González-Redondo Á, Redondo JL, Garrido JA, Ortigosa EM, Ortigosa PM (2022) Black-box and surrogate optimization for tuning spiking neural models of striatum plasticity. Frontiers Neuroinformatics 16:1017222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eriksson D, Bindel D, Shoemaker CA (2019) pySOT and POAP: An event-driven asynchronous framework for surrogate optimization. Preprint, submitted July 30, https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.00420.Google Scholar
  • Gutmann H-M (2001) A radial basis function method for global optimization. J. Global Optim. 19(3):201–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ilievski I, Akhtar T, Feng J, Shoemaker CA (2017) Efficient hyperparameter optimization for deep learning algorithms using deterministic RBF surrogates. Singh S, Markovitch S, eds. Thirty-First AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA), 822–829.Google Scholar
  • Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998) Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions. J. Global Optim. 13(4):455–492.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu X, Liu XC, Xie C, Ma X (2023) Impacts of photovoltaic and energy storage system adoption on public transport: A simulation-based optimization approach. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 181:113319.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu X, Peng Y, Zhang G, Zhou R (2024b) An efficient node selection policy for Monte Carlo tree search with neural networks. INFORMS J. Comput., ePub ahead of print September 18, https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0307.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu L, Yang M, Shoemaker CA, Xie T (2024a) Solving higher dimensional expensive black box global optimization problems using sparse directional search on surrogates. Math. Programming Comput. 16(4):665–693.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lu W, Xia W, Shoemaker CA (2022) Surrogate global optimization for identifying cost-effective green infrastructure for urban flood control with a computationally expensive inundation model. Water Resources Res. 58(4):e2021WR030928.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mugunthan P, Shoemaker CA, Regis RG (2005) Comparison of function approximation, heuristic and derivative-based methods for automatic calibration of computationally expensive groundwater bioremediation models. Water Resources Res. 41(11):W11427.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Müller J, Shoemaker CA, Piché R (2013) SO-MI: A surrogate model algorithm for computationally expensive nonlinear mixed-integer black-box global optimization problems. Comput. Oper. Res. 40(5):1383–1400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palar PS, Dwianto YB, Regis RG, Oyama A, Zuhal LR (2019) Benchmarking constrained surrogate-based optimization on low speed airfoil design problems. López-Ibáñez M, ed. GECCO ’19: Proc. Genetic Evolutionary Comput. Conf. Companion (ACM, New York), 1990–1998.Google Scholar
  • Perumal R, van Zyl TL (2025) Surrogate-assisted strategies: The parameterisation of an infectious disease agent-based model. Neural Comput. Appl. 37(18):627–638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell MJD (2002) UOBYQA: Unconstrained optimization by quadratic approximation. Math. Programming 92(3):555–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rakhshani H, Idoumghar L, Lepagnot J, Brévilliers M, Rahati A (2018) Accelerating protein structure prediction using active learning and surrogate-based optimization. Barbosa HJ, Zhou Y, eds. 2018 IEEE Congress Evolutionary Comput. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, NJ), 1–6.Google Scholar
  • Regis RG (2011) Stochastic radial basis function algorithms for large-scale optimization involving expensive black-box objective and constraint functions. Comput. Oper. Res. 38(5):837–853.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Regis RG (2021) High-dimensional constrained discrete expensive black-box optimization using a two-phase surrogate approach. Gervasi O, Murgante B, Misra S, Garau C, Blečić I, Taniar D, Apduhan BO, Rocha AMAC, Tarantino CE, Torre CM, eds. Comput. Sci. Appl.—ICCSA 2021: 21st Internat. Conf., Cagliari, Italy, September 13–16, 2021, Proc., Part V, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12953 (Springer, Cham, Switzerland), 366–381.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Regis RG, Shoemaker CA (2004) Local function approximation in evolutionary algorithms for the optimization of costly functions. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Comput. 8(5):490–505.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Regis RG, Shoemaker CA (2007) A stochastic radial basis function method for the global optimization of expensive functions. INFORMS J. Comput. 19(4):497–509.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Regis RG, Shoemaker CA (2009) Parallel stochastic global optimization using radial basis functions. INFORMS J. Comput. 21(3):411–426.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Regis RG, Shoemaker CA (2013) Combining radial basis function surrogates and dynamic coordinate search in high-dimensional expensive black-box optimization. Engrg. Optim. 45(5):529–555.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spall JC (2003) Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization (John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tolson BA, Shoemaker CA (2007) Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration. Water Resources Res. 43(1):W01413.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Torczon V (1997) On the convergence of pattern search algorithms. SIAM J. Optim. 7(1):1–25.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang W, Shoemaker CA (2023) Reference vector assisted candidate search with aggregated surrogate for computationally expensive many objective optimization problems. INFORMS J. Comput. 35(2):318–334.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Xia W, Shoemaker C (2021) GOPS: Efficient RBF surrogate global optimization algorithm with high dimensions and many parallel processors including application to multimodal water quality PDE model calibration. Optim. Engrg. 22(4):2741–2777.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xia W, Shoemaker C, Akhtar T, Nguyen MT (2021) Efficient parallel surrogate optimization algorithm and framework with application to parameter calibration of computationally expensive three-dimensional hydrodynamic lake PDE models. Environ. Model. Software 135:104910.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoon JH, Shoemaker CA (1999) Comparison of optimization methods for ground-water bioremediation. J. Water Resources Planning Management 125(1):54–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.