Responsible AI and Data Science for Social Good

References

  • Bakshi N, Kim J, Randhawa RS (2025) Service operations for justice-on-time: A data-driven queueing approach. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 27(1):305–321.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baltrušaitis T, Ahuja C, Morency LP (2018) Multimodal machine learning: A survey and taxonomy. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intelligence 41(2):423–443.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barocas S, Hardt M, Narayanan A (2023) Fairness and Machine Learning: Limitations and Opportunities (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 1–294.Google Scholar
  • Bawack R, Dennehy D, Kumi CA, Boutchouang W (2025) AI analytics in enhancing patient-centered care through wearables: A cross-country analysis. Inform. Systems Frontiers 27(6):2631–2649.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blumstein A (2007) An OR missionary’s visits to the criminal justice system. Oper. Res. 55(1):14–23.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brooks JP (2012) The court of appeals of Virginia uses integer programming and cloud computing to schedule sessions. Interfaces 42(6):544–553.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carrizosa E, Kurishchenko K, Romero Morales D (2025) On enhancing the explainability and fairness of tree ensembles. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 323(2):599–608.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chohlas-Wood A, Levine E (2019) A recommendation engine to aid in identifying crime patterns. INFORMS J. Appl. Anal. 49(2):154–166.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Delen D (2020) Predictive Analytics: Data Mining, Machine Learning and Data Science for Practitioners (Pearson FT Press, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Dimas GL, Konrad RA, Lee Maass K, Trapp AC (2022) Operations research and analytics to combat human trafficking: A systematic review of academic literature. PLoS One 17(8):e0273708.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dwork C, Hardt M, Pitassi T, Reingold O, Zemel R (2012) Fairness through awareness. Proc. 3rd Innovations Theoret. Comput. Sci. Conf. (ACM, New York), 214–226.Google Scholar
  • Floridi L, Cowls J, Beltrametti M, Chatila R, Chazerand P, Dignum V, Luetge C, et al. (2018) AI4people—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds Machines 28(4):689–707.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman N, Keskin BB, Bott GJ (2022) Collaborating with local and federal law enforcement for disrupting sex trafficking networks. INFORMS J. Appl. Anal. 52(5):446–459.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman N, Bott G, Keskin B, Parton J, Cochran J (2026) Linking multisite sex ad data at the individual level to aid counter-trafficking efforts. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 28(1):133–152.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gillespie T (2018) Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media (Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  • Glikson E, Woolley AW (2020) Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Acad. Management Ann. 14(2):627–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gorwa R, Binns R, Katzenbach C (2020) Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges in the automation of platform governance. Big Data Soc. 7(1):1–15.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardt M, Price E, Srebro N (2016) Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. Adv. Neural Inform. Processing Systems, vol. 29.Google Scholar
  • Informs (2025) Court backlogs are clogging the system—New research finds a surprising fix. https://www.informs.org/News-Room/INFORMS-Releases/News-Releases/Court-Backlogs-Are-Clogging-the-System-New-Research-Finds-a-Surprising-Fix.Google Scholar
  • Jain M, Tsai J, Pita J, Kiekintveld C, Rathi S, Tambe M, Ordóñez F (2010) Software assistants for randomized patrol planning for the LAX airport police and the Federal Air Marshal Service. Interfaces 40(4):267–290.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Konrad RA, Maass KL, Dimas GL, Trapp AC (2023) Perspectives on how to conduct responsible anti-human trafficking research in operations and analytics. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 309(1):319–329.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koski E, Das A, Hsueh PYS, Solomonides A, Joseph AL, Srivastava G, Johnson CE, et al. (2025) Towards responsible artificial intelligence in healthcare—Getting real about real-world data and evidence. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. 32(11):1746–1755.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazer DM, Baum MA, Benkler Y, Berinsky AJ, Greenhill KM, Menczer F, Metzger MJ, et al. (2018) The science of fake news. Science 359(6380):1094–1096.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levine ES, Tisch J, Tasso A, Joy M (2017) The New York City Police Department’s domain awareness system. Interfaces 47(1):70–84.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lodi A, Sankaranarayanan S, Wang G (2024) A framework for fair decision-making over time with time-invariant utilities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 319(2):456–467.Google Scholar
  • Madry A, Makelov A, Schmidt L, Tsipras D, Vladu A (2017) Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. Preprint, submitted June 19, https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.06083.Google Scholar
  • Memarian B, Doleck T (2023) Fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics (FATE) in artificial intelligence (AI) and higher education: A systematic review. Computers Ed. Artificial Intelligence 5:100152.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miao F, Holmes W, Huang R, Zhang H (2021) AI and Education: A Guidance for Policymakers (UNESCO Publishing, Paris).Google Scholar
  • Porayska-Pomsta K, Holmes W, Nemorin S (2023) The ethics of AI in education. du Boulay B, Mitrovic A, Yacef K, eds. Handbook of Artificial Intelligence in Education (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK), 571–604.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Quiñonero-Candela J, Sugiyama M, Schwaighofer A, Lawrence ND, eds. (2009) Dataset Shift in Machine Learning (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Röber TE, Lumadjeng AC, Akyüz MH, Birbil Şİ (2025) Rule generation for classification: Scalability, interpretability, and fairness. Comput. Oper. Res. 183:107163.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rudin C (2019) Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence 1(5):206–215.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Samorani M, Harris S, Blount LG, Lu H, Santoro MA (2022) Overbooked and overlooked: Machine learning and racial bias in medical appointment scheduling. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 24(6):2825–2842.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Selbst AD, Boyd D, Friedler SA, Venkatasubramanian S, Vertesi J (2019) Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. Proc. Conf. Fairness Accountability Transparency (ACM), 59–68.Google Scholar
  • Shahabsafa M, Terlaky T, Gudapati NVC, Sharma A, Wilson GR, Plebani LJ, Bucklen KB (2018) The inmate assignment and scheduling problem and its application in the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. Interfaces 48(5):467–483.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shu K, Sliva A, Wang S, Tang J, Liu H (2017) Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 19(1):22–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Siemens G (2013) Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. Amer. Behav. Sci. 57(10):1380–1400.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taruffo M (1998) Judicial decisions and artificial intelligence. Judicial Applications of Artificial Intelligence (Springer), 207–220.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trocin C, Mikalef P, Papamitsiou Z, Conboy K (2023) Responsible AI for digital health: A synthesis and a research agenda. Inform. Systems Frontiers 25(6):2139–2157.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Dijck J, Poell T, De Waal M (2018) The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World (Oxford University Press).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380):1146–1151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.