Quasi-Stochastic Electricity Markets

References

• Al-Abdullah Y, Abdi-Khorsand M, Hedman K (2015) The role of out-of-market corrections in day-ahead scheduling. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 30(4):1937–1946.Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Litvinov E, Sun X, Zhao J, Zheng T (2013) Adaptive robust optimization for the security constrained unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 28(1):52–63.Google Scholar
• Bjørndal E, Bjørndal M, Midthun K, Tomasgard A (2018) Stochastic electricity dispatch: A challenge for market design. Energy 150:992–1005.Google Scholar
• Chao HP (2019) Incentives for efficient pricing mechanism in markets with non-convexities. J. Regulatory Econom. 56(1):33–58.Google Scholar
• Cheung K, Gade D, Silva-Monroy C, Ryan S, Watson J, Wets R, Woodruff D (2015) Toward scalable stochastic unit commitment. Energy Systems 6(3):417–438.Google Scholar
• Cory-Wright R, Philpott A, Zakeri G (2018) Payment mechanisms for electricity markets with uncertain supply. Oper. Res. Lett. 46(1):116–121.Google Scholar
• Department of Market Monitoring–California ISO (2020) Annual report on market issues & performance. Accessed March 1, 2021, http://www.caiso.com/Documents/2019AnnualReportonMarketIssuesandPerformance.pdf.Google Scholar
• Eldridge B, O’Neill R, Hobbs B (2020) Near-optimal scheduling in day-ahead markets: Pricing models and payment redistribution bounds. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 35(3):1684–1694.Google Scholar
• Electric Power Research Institute (2019) Independent system operator and regional transmission organization price formation working group white paper: Current practice and research gaps in alternative (fast-start) price formation modeling. Accessed March 1, 2021, https://www.epri.com/\#/pages/product/3002013724/?lang=en-US.Google Scholar
• Electric Reliability Council of Texas (2019) ORDC OBD revisions for PUCT project 48551. Accessed March 1, 2021, http://www.ercot.com/mktrules/issues/OBDRR011.Google Scholar
• Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2014) Staff analysis of uplift in RTO and ISO markets. Accessed May 28, 2021, https://cms.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05/08-13-14-uplift_2.pdf.Google Scholar
• Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2019a) Docket no. EL18-33-000. Accessed May 28, 2021, https://www.ferc.gov/media/docket-no-el18-33-000-order-paper-hearing.Google Scholar
• Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2019b) Docket no. EL18-34-000. Accessed May 28, 2021, https://www.ferc.gov/media/docket-no-el18-34-000-order-paper-hearing.Google Scholar
• Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2019c) Energy price formation. Accessed May 28, 2021, https://www.ferc.gov/industries-data/electric/electric-power-markets/energy-price-formation.Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Rios I, Ryan S, Spürkel K, Watson J, Wets R, Woodruff D (2015) Toward scalable stochastic unit commitment. part 1: Load scenario generation. Energy Systems 6(3):309–329.Google Scholar
• Ferris M, Philpott A (2018) Dynamic risked equilibrium. Accessed May 28, 2021, https://www.ferc.gov/industries-data/electric/electric-power-markets/energy-price-formation.Google Scholar
• Gribik P, Hogan W, Pope S (2007) Market-clearing electricity prices and energy uplift. Accessed May 28, 2021, http://www.lmpmarketdesign.com/papers/Gribik_Hogan_Pope_Price_Uplift_123107.pdf.Google Scholar
• Herrero I, Rodilla P, Batlle C (2018) Enhancing intraday price signals in U.S. ISO markets for a better integration of variable energy resources. Energy J. 39(3):141–165.Google Scholar
• Hogan W (2013) Electricity scarcity pricing through operating reserves. Econom. Energy Environmental Policy 2(2):65–86.Google Scholar
• Joskow P (2007) Competitive electricity markets and investment in new generating capacity. Helm D, ed. The New Energy Paradigm (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK), 76–122.Google Scholar
• Kazempour J, Hobbs B (2018a) Value of flexible resources, virtual bidding, and self-scheduling in two-settlement electricity markets with wind generation–part i: Principles and competitive model. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 33(1):749–759.Google Scholar
• Kazempour J, Hobbs B (2018b) Value of flexible resources, virtual bidding, and self-scheduling in two-settlement electricity markets with wind generation–part ii: ISO models and application. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 33(1):760–770.Google Scholar
• Kazempour J, Pinson P, Hobbs B (2018) A stochastic market design with revenue adequacy and cost recovery by scenario: Benefits and costs. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 33(4):3531–3545.Google Scholar
• Kuang X, Dvorkin Y, Lamadrid A, Ortega-Vazquez M, Zuluaga L (2018) Pricing chance constraints in electricity markets. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 33(4):4634–4636.Google Scholar
• Liberopoulos G, Andrianesis P (2016) Critical review of pricing schemes in markets with non-convex costs. Oper. Res. 64(1):17–31.Link, Google Scholar
• Lorca Á, Sun X, Litvinov E, Zheng T (2016) Multistage adaptive robust optimization for the unit commitment problem. Oper. Res. 64(1):32–51.Link, Google Scholar
• Mather J, Bitar E, Poolla K (2017) Virtual bidding: Equilibrium, learning, and the wisdom of crowds. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50(1):225–232.Google Scholar
• Mays J, Morton D, O’Neill R (2021) Investment effects of pricing schemes for non-convex markets. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 289(2):712–726.Google Scholar
• Monitoring Analytics LLC (2019a) 2019 Quarterly state of the market report for PJM: January through March. Accessed March 1, 2021, http://www.monitoringanalytics.com/reports/PJM_State_of_the_Market/2019.shtml.Google Scholar
• Monitoring Analytics LLC (2019b) State of the market report for PJM. Accessed March 1, 2021, http://www.monitoringanalytics.com/reports/PJM_State_of_the_Market/2018.shtml.Google Scholar
• Morales J, Conejo A, Liu K, Zhong J (2012) Pricing electricity in pools with wind producers. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 27(3):1366–1376.Google Scholar
• Morales-España G, Latorre J, Ramos A (2013) Tight and compact MILP formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 28(4):4897–4908.Google Scholar
• New England ISO (2017) Real-time fast-start pricing project. Accessed March 1, 2021, https://www.iso-ne.com/participate/support/customer-readiness-outlook/real-time-fast-start-pricing-project.Google Scholar
• Newell S, Carroll R, Kaluzhny A, Spees K, Carden K, Wintermantel N, Krasny A (2018) Estimation of the market equilibrium and economically optimal reserve margins for the ERCOT region. Accessed March 1, 2021, http://www.ercot.com/content/wcm/lists/143980/10.12.2018_ERCOT_MERM_Report_Final_Draft.pdf.Google Scholar
• O’Neill R, Sotkiewicz P, Hobbs B, Rothkopf M, Stewart W (2005) Efficient market-clearing prices in markets with nonconvexities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 164(1):269–285.Google Scholar
• Ostrowski J, Anjos MF, Vannelli A (2012) Tight mixed integer linear programming formulations for the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 27(1):39–46.Google Scholar
• Papavasiliou A, Smeers Y (2017) Remuneration of flexibility using operating reserve demand curves: A case study of Belgium. Energy J. 38(6):105–135.Google Scholar
• Parvania M, Khatami R (2017) Continuous-time marginal pricing of electricity. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 32(3):1960–1969.Google Scholar
• PJM (2019) Enhanced price formation in reserve markets of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. Accessed March 1, 2021, http://www.pjm.com/directory/etariff/FercDockets/4036/20190329-el19-58-000.pdf.Google Scholar
• Potomac Economics (2019) 2018 State of the market report for the ERCOT electricity markets. Accessed March 1, 2021, https://www.potomaceconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2018-State-of-the-Market-Report.pdf.Google Scholar
• Powell W (2019) A unified framework for stochastic optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 275(3):795–821.Google Scholar
• Pritchard G, Zakeri G, Philpott A (2010) A single-settlement, energy-only electric power market for unpredictable and intermittent participants. Oper. Res. 58(4-part-2):1210–1219.Link, Google Scholar
• Schiro D, Zheng T, Zhao F, Litvinov E (2016) Convex hull pricing in electricity markets: Formulation, analysis, and implementation challenges. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 31(5):4068–4075.Google Scholar
• Sioshansi R, O’Neill R, Oren S (2008) Economic consequences of alternative solution methods for centralized unit commitment in day-ahead electricity markets. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 23(2):344–352.Google Scholar
• Wang B, Hobbs B (2016) Real-time markets for FlexiRamp: A stochastic unit commitment-based analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 31(2):846–860.Google Scholar
• Wang C, Luh P, Gribik P, Peng T, Zhang L (2016) Commitment cost allocation of fast-start units for approximate extended locational marginal prices. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 31(6):4176–4184.Google Scholar
• Wong S, Fuller J (2007) Pricing energy and reserves using stochastic optimization in an alternative electricity market. IEEE Trans. Power Systems 22(2):631–638.Google Scholar
• Zakeri G, Pritchard G, Bjorndal M, Bjorndal E (2019) Pricing wind: A revenue adequate, cost recovering uniform price auction for electricity markets with intermittent generation. INFORMS J. Optim. 1(1):35–48.Link, Google Scholar
• Zavala V, Kim K, Anitescu M, Birge J (2017) A stochastic electricity market clearing formulation with consistent pricing properties. Oper. Res. 65(3):557–576.Link, Google Scholar