Portfolio Optimization Under Regime Switching and Transaction Costs: Combining Neural Networks and Dynamic Programs

References

• Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, Brevdo E, Chen Z, Citro C, Corrado GS, et al. (2015) TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems, www.tensorflow.org/about/bib.Google Scholar
• Almgren R, Chriss N (2001) Optimal execution of portfolio transactions. J. Risk 3(2):5–40.Google Scholar
• Arrow KJ (1971) The theory of risk aversion. Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing (Markham, Chicago), 90–120.Google Scholar
• Bauerle N, Rieder U (2004) Portfolio optimization with Markov-modulated stock prices and interest rates. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 49(3):442–447.Google Scholar
• Bauerle N, Rieder U (2007) Portfolio optimization with jumps and unobservable intensity process. Math. Finance 17(2):205–224.Google Scholar
• Bellman R (1954) The theory of dynamic programming. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 60(6):503–515.Google Scholar
• Bertsimas D, Pachamanova D (2008) Robust multiperiod portfolio management in the presence of transaction costs. Comput. Oper. Res. 35(1):3–17.Google Scholar
• Birge JR (2007) Optimization methods in dynamic portfolio management. Birge JR, Linetsky V, eds. Financial Engineering, vol. 15 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 845–865.Google Scholar
• Birge JR (2012) Particle methods for data-driven simulation and optimization. TutORials in Operations Research (INFORMS, Catonsville, MD), 92–102.Google Scholar
• Çanakoğlu E, Özekici S (2009) Portfolio selection in stochastic markets with exponential utility functions. Ann. Oper. Res. 166(1):281.Google Scholar
• Çanakoğlu E, Özekici S (2012) Hara frontiers of optimal portfolios in stochastic markets. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 221(1):129–137.Google Scholar
• Casas CA (2001) Tactical asset allocation: an artificial neural network based model. Proc. Internat. Joint Conf. Neural Networks (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 1811–1816.Google Scholar
• Chung J, Gulcehre C, Cho K, Bengio Y (2014) Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. NIPS 2014 Workshop Deep Learning. Preprint, submitted December 11, https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.3555.Google Scholar
• Connor JT, Martin RD (1994) Recurrent neural networks and robust time series prediction. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 5(2):240–254.Google Scholar
• Davis MH, Norman AR (1990) Portfolio selection with transaction costs. Math. Oper. Res. 15(4):676–713.Link, Google Scholar
• Dumas B, Luciano E (1991) An exact solution to a dynamic portfolio choice problem under transactions costs. J. Finance 46(2):577–595.Google Scholar
• Elliott RJ, Siu TK (2009) Robust optimal portfolio choice under Markovian regime-switching model. Methodology Comput. Appl. Probab. 11(2):145–157.Google Scholar
• Han J, E W (2016) Deep learning approximation for stochastic control problems. Preprint, submitted November 2, https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.07422.Google Scholar
• Hejazi SA, Jackson KR (2016) A neural network approach to efficient valuation of large portfolios of variable annuities. Insurance Math. Econom. 70:169–181.Google Scholar
• Kamijo Ki, Tanigawa T (1990) Stock price pattern recognition-a recurrent neural network approach. Proc. Internat. Joint Conf. Neural Networks (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ), 215–221.Google Scholar
• Kolm PN, Ritter G (2014) Multiperiod portfolio selection and Bayesian dynamic models. Risk 28(3):50–54.Google Scholar
• Li Y, Forsyth PA (2019) A data-driven neural network approach to optimal asset allocation for target based defined contribution pension plans. Insurance Math. Econom. 86:189–204.Google Scholar
• Liu RH (2014) A finite-horizon optimal investment and consumption problem using regime-switching models. Internat. J. Theoret. Appl. Finance 17(4):1–18.Google Scholar
• Loshchilov I, Hutter F (2016) SGDR: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts. Preprint, submitted August 13, https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.03983.Google Scholar
• Merton RC (1969) Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: The continuous-time case. Rev. Econom. Statist. 51(3):247–257.Google Scholar
• Mulvey JM, Liu H (2016) Identifying economic regimes: Reducing downside risks for university endowments and foundations. J. Portfolio Management 43(1):100–108.Google Scholar
• Mulvey JM, Lu N, Sweemer J (2001) Rebalancing strategies for multi-period asset allocation. J. Wealth Management 4(2):51–58.Google Scholar
• Mulvey JM, Sun Y, Wang M, Ye J (2020) Optimizing a portfolio of mean-reverting assets with transaction costs via a feedforward neural network. Quant. Finance 20(8):1–23.Google Scholar
• Nystrup P, Madsen H, Lindström E (2018) Dynamic portfolio optimization across hidden market regimes. Quant. Finance 18(1):83–95.Google Scholar
• Nystrup P, Boyd S, Lindström E, Madsen H (2019) Multi-period portfolio selection with drawdown control. Ann. Oper. Res. 282(1–2):245–271.Google Scholar
• Nystrup P, Hansen BW, Madsen H, Lindström E (2015) Regime-based vs. static asset allocation: Letting the data speak. J. Wealth Management 42(1):103–109.Google Scholar
• Palczewski J, Poulsen R, Schenk-Hoppé KR, Wang H (2015) Dynamic portfolio optimization with transaction costs and state-dependent drift. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 243(3):921–931.Google Scholar
• Pratt JW (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32(1–2):122–136.Google Scholar
• Samuelson PA (1969) Lifetime portfolio selection by dynamic stochastic programming. Rev. Econom. Statist. 5(3):239–246.Google Scholar
• Schuster M, Paliwal KK (1997) Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 45(11):2673–2681.Google Scholar
• Silver D, Huang A, Maddison CJ, Guez A, Sifre L, Driessche GVD, Schrittwieser J, et al. (2016) Mastering the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature 529(7587):484–489.Google Scholar
• Sotomayor LR, Cadenillas A (2009) Explicit solutions of consumption investment problems in financial markets with regime switching. Math. Finance 19(2):251–279.Google Scholar
• Zhou XY, Yin G (2003) Markowitz’s mean-variance portfolio selection with regime switching: A continuous-time model. SIAM J. Control Optim. 42(4):1466–1482.Google Scholar