General Motors Increases Its Production Throughput

References

• Alden J. M. Estimating performance of two workstations in series with downtime and unequal speeds. (2002) . GM technical report R&D-9434, Warren, MIGoogle Scholar
• Altiok T.Performance Analysis of Manufacturing Systems (1997) (Springer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buzacott J. A., Shantikumar J. G.Stochastic Models of Manufacturing Systems (1993) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Chen J. C., Chen L., Balci O., Sadowski R. P., Nance R. E. A fast simulation approach for tandem queueing systems. Proc. 22nd Conf. Winter Simulation (1990) (IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ) 539–546Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dallery Y., Gershwin S. B. Manufacturing flow line systems: A review of models and analytical results. Queuing Systems (1992) 12(1–2):3–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dallery Y., Towsley D. Symmetry property of the throughput in closed tandem queueing networks with finite buffers. Oper. Res. Lett. (1991) 10(9):541–547Crossref, Google Scholar
• General Motors Corporation1991 Annual Report (1992) (Detroit, MI)Google Scholar
• General Motors Corporation2004 Annual Report (2005a) (Detroit, MI)Google Scholar
• General Motors Corporation Company profile. (2005b) . Retrieved February 25, 2005 from http://www.gm.com/company/corp_info/profiles/Google Scholar
• Gershwin S. B. An efficient decomposition method for the approximate evaluation of tandem queues with finite storage space and blocking. Oper. Res. (1987) 35(2):291–305Link, Google Scholar
• Gershwin S. B.Manufacturing Systems Engineering (1994) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Goldratt E. M., Cox J.The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement (1986) (North River Press, Croton-on-Hudson, NY) Google Scholar
• Govil M. C., Fu M. C. Queueing theory in manufacturing: A survey. J. Manufacturing Systems (1999) 18(3):214–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harbour and Associates, Inc.The Harbour Report: Competitive Assessment of the North American Automotive Industry 1989–1992 (1992) (Troy, MI)Google Scholar
• Harbour and Associates, Inc.The Harbour Report 1999—North America (1999) (Troy, MI)Google Scholar
• Harbour and Associates, Inc.The Harbour Report North America 2000 (2000) (Troy, MI)Google Scholar
• Harbour and Associates, Inc.The Harbour Report North America 2001 (2001) (Troy, MI)Google Scholar
• Harbour and Associates, Inc.The Harbour Report North America 2002 (2002) (Troy, MI)Google Scholar
• Harbour and Associates, Inc.The Harbour Report North America 2003 (2003) (Troy, MI)Google Scholar
• Harbour ConsultingThe Harbour Report North America 2004 (2004) (Troy, MI)Google Scholar
• Li J., Blumenfeld D. E., Alden J. M. Throughput analysis of serial production lines with two machines: Summary and comparisons. (2003) . GM technical report R&D-9532, Warren, MIGoogle Scholar
• Muth E. J. The reversibility property of production lines. Management Sci. (1979) 25(2):152–158Link, Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos H. T., Harvey C. Queueing theory in manufacturing systems analysis and design: A classification of models for production and transfer lines. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1996) 92(1):1–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Viswanadham N., Narahari Y.Performance Modeling of Automated Manufacturing Systems (1992) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar