Safeguarding the Promise of Production Outsourcing

References

• Bahli Bouchaib, Rivard Suzanne. The information technology outsourcing risk: A transaction cost and agency theory-based perspective. J. Information Tech. (2003) 18(3):211–222Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barthelemy Jerome. The seven deadly sins of outsourcing. Acad. Management Executive (2003) 17(2):87–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Billington Corey, Kuper Andre, Wharton A. Trends in procurement: A perspective. Achieving Supply Chain Excellence Through Technology (2003) Vol. 5(Montgomery Research, Inc., San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Billington Corey, Johnson Blake, Triantis Alex. A real options perspective on supply chain management in high technology. J. Appl. Corporate Finance (2002) 15(2):32–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon Gerard P., Graves S., de Kok T. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2003) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cachon Gerard P., Netessine Serguei, Simchi-Levi David, Wu S. David, Shen Zuo-Jun (Max). Game theory in supply chain analysis. Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis (2004) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carbone James. Hewlett-Packard wins for the 2nd time. Purchasing Magazine (2004) 133(14):34–50Google Scholar
• Doig Stephen J., Ritter Ronald C., Speckhals Kurt, Woolson Daniel. Has outsourcing gone too far? McKinsey Quart. (2001) 4):25–37Google Scholar
• Earl Michael J. The risks of outsourcing IT. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 37(3):26–32Google Scholar
• Eccles Robert G., White Harrison C. Price and authority in inter-profit-center transactions. Amer. J. Sociology (1988) 94(Supplement: Organizations and institutions: Sociological and economic approaches to the analysis of social structure):S17–S51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt Kathleen M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(1):57–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellram Lisa, Billington Corey. Purchasing leverage considerations in the outsourcing decision. Eur. J. Purchasing Supply Management (2001) 7(1):15–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elmaghraby Wedad J. Supply contract competition and sourcing policies. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(4):350–371Link, Google Scholar
• Hargadon Andrew, Sutton Robert I. Building an innovation factory. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) May–June):157–166Google Scholar
• Hartley Janet L., Greer Bertie M., Park Seungwook. Chrysler leverages its suppliers’ improvement suggestions. Interfaces (2002) 32(4):20–27Link, Google Scholar
• Hohner Gail, Rich John, Ng Ed, Reid Grant, Davenport Andrew J., Kalagnanam Jayant R., Lee Ho Soo, An Chae. Combinatorial and quantity-discount procurement auctions benefit Mars, Incorporated and its suppliers. Interfaces (2003) 33(1):23–35Link, Google Scholar
• Jorgensen Barbara. Motorola to hide pricing. ElectronicNews.com (2003a) . November 3. Retrieved January 16, 2006 http://www.reed-electronics.com/electronicnews/article/CA333610.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Jorgensen Barbara. Back to the future. Electronic Bus. (2003b) 29(15):42Google Scholar
• Jorgensen Barbara. One step at a time. Electronic Bus. (2004a) 30(4):38Google Scholar
• Jorgensen Barbara. When outsourcing isn’t the answer. Electronic Bus. (2004b) 30(9):39–40Google Scholar
• Lakenan Bill, Boyd Darren, Frey Ed. Why Cisco fell: Outsourcing and its perils. Strategy Business (2001) Q3(24):1–12Google Scholar
• Ledyard John O., Olson Mark, Porter David, Swanson Joseph A., Torma David P. The first use of a combined-value auction for transportation services. Interfaces (2002) 32(5):4–12Link, Google Scholar
• Lee Hau L., Billington Corey. Managing supply chain inventory: Pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Management Rev. (1992) 33(3):65–73Google Scholar
• Lee Hau L., Padmanabhan V., Whang Seungjin. The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management Rev. (1997) 38(3):93–102Google Scholar
• Lewis Jordan D.Trusted Partners: How Companies Build Mutual Trust and Win Together (1999) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Li Lode. Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition. Management Sci. (2002) 48(9):1196–1212Link, Google Scholar
• Lidow Derek. Perspective: Mastering supply chain politics. CommsDesign.com (2004) April 1). Retrieved January 16, 2006 http://www.commsdesign.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=18600479Google Scholar
• Linder Jane C. Transformational outsourcing. Sloan Management Rev. (2004) 45(2):52–58Google Scholar
• Logan Mary S. Using agency theory to design successful outsourcing relationships. Internat. J. Logist. Management (2000) 11(2):21–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan Jim. R. Gene Richter: The man who made supply strategies work. Purchasing (2003) 132(17):45–50Google Scholar
• Mucha Susan. EMS contracts: More than a handshake. Circuits Assembly (2002) August):42–46Google Scholar
• Narayanan V. G., Raman Ananth. Aligning incentives in supply chains. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) November):2–9Google Scholar
• Norberg Roger W., Banavige Joseph M. Electronics manufacturing supply chain. (1999) . Investment report, US Bancorp, Piper Jaffray, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Prahalad C. K., Hamel Gary. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1990) May–June):79–90Google Scholar
• Purchasing OEMs should outsource, but maintain control of sourcing. (2003) 132(19):56Google Scholar
• Quinn James Brian, Hilmer Frederick G. Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Management Rev. (1994) 35(4):43–55Google Scholar
• Shen Steve. Dell aims to establish a new model for notebook procurement. Digitimes.com (2003) December 1). Retrieved January 16, 2006 http://www.digitimes.com/NewsShow/Article.asp?datePublish=2003/12/01&pages=A1&seq=1Google Scholar
• Sullivan Laurie. Outsourcing’s hidden costs. EBNonline.com (2003) October 6). Retrieved January 16, 2006 http://www.my-esm.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=15201550Google Scholar
• Taylor Terry A., Plambeck Erica L. Supply chain relationships and contracts: The impact of repeated interaction on capacity investment and procurement. (2003) . Stanford GSB Research Paper 1813, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Thurm Scott. Flextronics must pay damages. The Wall Street J. (2003) September 25):B1Google Scholar
• Tsay Andy A., Nahmias Steven, Agrawal Narendra, Tayur S., Ganeshan R., Magazine M. Modeling supply chain contracts: A review. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (1998) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) 299–336Google Scholar