The Ombudsman: Verification of Citations: Fawlty Towers of Knowledge?

References

• Armstrong J. S. Management folklore and management science: On portfolio planning, escalation bias, and such. Interfaces (1996) 26(4):28–42Link, Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S. Significance tests harm progress in forecasting. Internat. J. Forecasting (2007) 23:321–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14(3):396–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aronsky D., Ransom J., Robinson K. Accuracy of references in five biomedical informatics journals. J. Amer. Medical Informatics Assoc. (2005) 12(2):225–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Collier J. E., Bienstock C. C. An analysis of how nonresponse error is assessed in academic marketing research. Marketing Theory (2007) 7(2):163–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLacey G., Record C., Wade J. How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals? British Medical J. (1985) 291:884–886Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dillman D. A.Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2000) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Doms C. A. A survey of reference accuracy in five national dental journals. J. Dental Res. (1989) 68(3):442–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eichorn P., Yankauer A. Do authors check their references? A survey of accuracy of references in three public health journals. Amer. J. Public Health (1987) 77(8):1011–1012Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans J. T., Nadjari H. I., Burchell S. A. Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals: A continuing peer review problem. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. (1990) 263(10):1353–1354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fenton J. E., Brazier H., De Souza A., Hughes J. P., McShane D. P. The accuracy of citation and quotation in otolaryngology/head and neck surgery journals. Clinical Otolaryngology (2000) 25:40–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke R. H. Worker productivity at Hawthorne. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1980) 45(6):1006–1027Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franke R. H. Advancing knowledge, a comment from Richard H. Franke. Interfaces (1996) 26(4):52–57Google Scholar
• Franke R. H., Kaul J. D. The Hawthorne experiments: First statistical interpretation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1978) 43(5):623–643Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gendall P. Responding to the problem of nonresponse. Australasian J. Marketing Res. (2000) 8(1):3–18Google Scholar
• Gosling C. M., Cameron M., Gibbons P. F. Referencing and quotation accuracy in four manual therapy journals. Manual Therapy (2004) 9:36–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lok C. K. W., Chan M. T. V., Martinson I. M. Risk factors for citation errors in peer-reviewed nursing journals. J. Adv. Nursing (2001) 34(2):223–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lukic I. K., Lukic A., Gluncic V., Katavic V., Vucenik V., Marusic A. Citation and quotation accuracy in three anatomy journals. Clinical Anatomy (2004) 17:534–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacRoberts M. H., MacRoberts B. R. Quantitative measures of communication in science: A study of the formal level. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1986) 16:151–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacRoberts M. H., MacRoberts B. R. Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (1989) 40(5):342–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parsons H. M. What happened at Hawthorne? Science (1974) 183:922–932Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach V. J., Lau T. K., Warwick D., Kee N. The quality of citations in major international obstetrics and gynecology journals. Amer. J. Obstetrics and Gynecology (1997) 177(4):973–975Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roethlisberger F. J., Dickson W. J.Management and the Worker (1939) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Schulmeister L. Quotation and reference accuracy of three nursing journals. Image: J. Nursing Scholarship (1998) 30(2):143–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wager E., Middleton P. Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals. (2003) . The Cochrane Database of Methodology Reviews. 1 Art. MR000002, DOI: 10.1002/14651858MR000002. [This version first published online: January 20, 2003 in Issue 1. Date of most substantive amendment: November 4, 2002.]Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14(3):396–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dillman D. A.Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method (1978) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Dillman D. A.Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2000) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Clark R. W.Einstein: The Life and Times (1979) revised British ed.(Hodder & Stoughton, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14(3):396–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• MacRoberts M. H., MacRoberts B. R. Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (1989) 40(5):342–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin B. Scientific fraud and the power structure of science. Prometheus (1992) 10(1):83–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravetz J. R.Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems (1971) (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14(3):396–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dillman D. A.Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method (1978) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar