LDP Lean Document Production—O.R.-Enhanced Productivity Improvements for the Printing Industry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.1080.0413

References

  • Caslon & CompanyThe North America Production Digital Printing Market—Market Segment Analysis (2007) (Rochester, NY) Google Scholar
  • Colorni A., Dorigo M., Maniezzo V., Trubian M. Ant system for job-shop scheduling. Belgian J. Oper. Res. Statist. Comp. Sci. (1994) 34(1):39–53Google Scholar
  • Crovella M. E., Taqqu M. S., Bestavros A. Heavy-tailed probability distributions in the World Wide Web. A Practical Guide to Heavy Tails: Statistical Techniques and Applications (1998) (Chapman & Hall, New York) 1–23Google Scholar
  • Dell'Amico M., Trubian M. Applying Tabu-search to the job-shop scheduling problem. Ann. Oper. Res. (1993) 4:231–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Egbelu P. J., Lehtihet A. Operation routing with lot sizing consideration in a manufacturing system. Internat. J. Production Res. (1990) 28:503–515CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gershwin S. B.Manufacturing Systems Engineering (1994) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Goldratt E. M.Theory of Constraints (1990) (North River Press Publishing Corporation, Great Barrington, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hall W. R.Driving the Productivity Machines: Production Planning and Control in Japan (1981) (American Production and Inventory Control Society, Falls Church, VA) Google Scholar
  • Harchol-Balter M., Downey A. Exploiting process lifetime distributions for dynamic load balancing. Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS '96 (1996) Philadelphia(Association for Computing Machinery, New York) 13–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harchol-Balter M., Crovella M. E., Murta C. D. On choosing a task assignment policy for a distributed server system. IEEE J. Parallel Distributed Comput. (1999) 59(2):204–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jackson W. B., Rai S. System and method for converting print jobs stored in printshop job description language files into printshop workflow. (2000) . US patent 7,064,848, filed December 12, 2000, issued June 20, 2006Google Scholar
  • Jain A. S., Meeran S. Job-shop scheduling using neural networks. Internat. J. Production Res. (1998) 36(5):1249–1272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kannan V. R., Lyman S. B. Impact of family-based scheduling on transfer batches in a job shop manufacturing cell. Internat. J. Production Res. (1994) 32:2777–2794CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee C.-Y., Poramuthu S., Tsai Y. K. Job shop scheduling with a genetic algorithm and machine learning. Internat. J. Production Res. (1997) 35(4):1171–1191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin J., Jacobs T. W., Rai S. System and method for determining an optimal batch size for a print job. (2005) . US patent 20070092323, filed October 20, 2005, issued April 26, 2007Google Scholar
  • Minitab Release 15. (2008) (Minitab Inc., State College, PA) Google Scholar
  • Muth J. F., Thompson G. L.Industrial Scheduling (1963) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Nham J. Size-independent vs. size-dependent policies in scheduling heavy-tailed distributions. (2008) . Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Pinedo M., Chao X.Operations Scheduling with Applications in Manufacturing & Services (1998) (Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Rai S. System and method for dynamically reconfiguring one or more autonomous cells in a print shop environment. (2005) . US Patent publication 20070091355, filed October 26, 2005, issued April 26, 2007Google Scholar
  • Rai S., Fowler J., Mason S. Fat-tail inputs in manufacturing systems. Proc. 2008 Indust. Engrg. Res. Conf. (2008) Vancouver(Institute of Industrial Engineers, Norcross, GA) Google Scholar
  • Rai S., Maitra S. C. Method for determining optimal batch sizes for processing print jobs in a printing environment. (2001) . US patent 6,805,502, filed January 23, 2001, issued October 19, 2004Google Scholar
  • Rai S., Viassolo D. Production server architecture and methods for automated control of production document management. (2001) . US patent 7,051,328, filed January 26, 2001, issued May 23, 2006Google Scholar
  • Rai S., Viassolo D. A lean document production controller for printshop management. Proc. 42nd IEEE Conf. Decision Control (2003) 4Maui, HI(Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Los Alamitos, CA) 4115–4125Google Scholar
  • Rai S., Zhang Z. Print job management system. (2006) . US patent publication 20070236724, filed March 30, 2006, issued October 11, 2007Google Scholar
  • Rai S., Godambe A., Duke C. B., Williams G. Print shop resource optimization via the use of autonomous cells. (2000) . US patent 7,079,266, filed November 3, 2000, issued July 18, 2006Google Scholar
  • Rinnooy Kan A. H. G.Machine Scheduling Problems: Classification, Complexity and Computations (1976) (Nijhoff, The Hauge, Switzerland) Google Scholar
  • Sawaragi Y., Nakayama H., Tanino T.Theory of Multiobjective Optimization (1985) (Academic Press, Orlando, FL) Google Scholar
  • Spearman M. L., Woodruff D. L., Hopp W. J. CONWIP: A pull alternative to Kanban. Internat. J. Production Res. (1990) 28(5):879–894CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Squires D., Rai S. Production server for automated control of production document management. (2000) . US patent 7,065,567, filed November 3, 2000, issued June 20, 2006Google Scholar
  • US Census Bureau The statistical abstract, 2008 ed.. (2008) . Retrieved September 30, 2008, http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2008edition.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Van Laarhoven P. J. M., Aarts E. H. L., Lenstra J. L. Job shop scheduling by simulated annealing. Oper. Res. (1992) 40:113–125LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wein L. W. Scheduling semiconductor wafer fabrication. IEEE Trans. Semiconductor Manufacturing (1988) 1(3):115–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wight O. W. Input/output control: A real handle on lead time. Production Inventory Management J. (1970) 11(3):9–31Google Scholar
  • Xerox Corporation Annual Report. (2006) . Retrieved May 24, 2008, http://www.xerox.com/Static_HTML/annualreport/2006/index.html?&Xcntry=USA&Xlang=en_USGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.