The Ombudsman: Are Top Executives Paid Enough? An Evidence-Based Review

References

• Ahlburg DA (1992) Predicting the job performance of managers: What do the experts know? Internat. J. Forecasting 7(4):467–472.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aquino K, Freeman D, Reed A, Felps W, Lim VK (2009) Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. J. Personality Sociol. Psych. 97(1):123–141.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arando S, Freundlich F, Gago M, Jones DC, Kato T (2011) Assessing Mondragon: Stability and managed change in the face of globalization. Carberry E, ed. Employee Ownership and Shared Capitalism: New Directions in Research (ILR Press/Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY), 241–272.Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Gneez U, Loewenstein G, Mazar N (2009) Large stakes and big mistakes. Rev. Econom. Stud. 76(2):451–469.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS (1977) Social irresponsibility in management. J. Bus. Res. 5(3):185–213.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS (1980) The seer-sucker theory: The value of experts in forecasting. Tech. Rev. 83(7):16–24.Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, ed. (2001) Principles of Forecasting (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS (2012a) Illusions in regression analysis. Internat. J. Forecasting 28(3):689–694.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS (2012b) Natural learning in higher education. Seel NM, ed. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (Springer, New York), 2426–2433.Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS (2012c) Predicting job performance: The moneyball factor. Foresight Internat. J. Appl. Forecasting 25(Spring):31–34.Google Scholar
• Armstrong JS, Graefe A (2011) Predicting elections from biographical information about candidates: A test of the index method. J. Bus. Res. 64(7):699–706.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA, Fried JM (2010) Paying for long-term performance. Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. 158(7):1915–1959.Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA, Cohen A, Ferrell A (2009) What matters in corporate governance? Rev. Financial Stud. 22(2):783–827.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bebchuk LA, Grinstein Y, Peyer U (2010) Lucky CEOs and lucky directors. J. Finance 65(6):2363–2401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bereskin FL, Cicero DC (2012) CEO compensation contagion: Evidence from an exogenous shock. J. Financial Econom. 107(2):477–493.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (1999) Is there discretion in wage setting? A test using takeover legislation. RAND J. Econom. 30(3):535–554.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2001) Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principles are. Quart. J. Econom. 116(3):901–932.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J. Political Econom. 111(5):1043–1075.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bidwell M (2011) Paying more to get less: Specific skills, matching, and the effects of external hiring versus internal promotion. Admin. Sci. Quart. 56(3):369–407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brief AP, Dukerich JM, Brown PR, Brett JF (1996) What’s wrong with the treadway commission report? Experimental analyses of the effects of personal values and codes of conduct on fraudulent financial reporting. J. Bus. Ethics 15(2):183–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron J, Pierce WD (1994) Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Rev. Ed. Res. 64(3):363–423.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chhaochharia V, Grinstein Y (2009) CEO compensation and board structure. J. Finance 64(1):231–261.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark T (1992) Management selection by executive recruitment consultancies: A survey and explanation of selection methods. J. Managerial Psych. 7(6):3–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dakin S, Armstrong JS (1989) Predicting job performance: A comparison of expert opinion and research findings. Internat. J. Forecasting 5(2):87–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM (1999) A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psych. Bull. 125(6):627–668.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC (2009) Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2008. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
• Eisenberger R, Cameron J (1996) Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? Amer. Psychologist 51(11):1153–1166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frey BS, Jegen R (2001) Motivation crowding theory. J. Econom. Surveys 15(5):589–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garvey GT, Milbourn TT (2006) Asymmetric benchmarking in compensation: Executives are rewarded for good luck but not penalized for bad. J. Financial Econom. 82(1):97–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerhart B, Rynes SL, Fulmer IS (2009) Pay and performance: Individuals, groups, and executives. Acad. Management Ann. 3(1):251–315.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goldin C, Rouse C (2000) Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):715–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green KC, Armstrong JS (2007) Structured analogies for forecasting. Internat. J. Forecasting 23(3):365–376.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grove WM, Zald DH, Lebow BS, Snitz BE, Nelson C (2000) Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psych. Assessment 12(1):19–30.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamermesh DS, Biddle JE (1994) Beauty and the labor market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 84(5):1174–1194.Google Scholar
• Harris D, Helfat C (1997) Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation. Strategic Management J. 18(11):895–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM, Gibbs BJ, McKenzie CRM, Marquis MA (1991) Learning from feedback: Exactingness and incentives. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory Cognition 17(4):734–752.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jenkins GD, Mitra A, Gupta N, Shaw JD (1998) Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. J. Appl. Psych. 83(5):777–787.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen MC, Murphy KJ (1990) Performance pay and top-management incentives. J. Political Econom. 98(2):225–264.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones JM (2009) Most Americans favor gov’t. action to limit executive pay. Accessed May 1, 2013, http://www.gallup.com/poll/120872/americans-favor-gov-action-limit-executive-pay.aspx.Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(5):1346–1361.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lie E (2005) On the timing of CEO stock option awards. Management Sci. 51(5):802–812.Link, Google Scholar
• Malmendier U, Tate G (2009) Superstar CEOs. Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1593–1638.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meehl PE (1954) Clinical vs. Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mobbs D, Hassabis D, Seymour B, Marchant JL, Weiskopf N, Dolan RJ, Frith CD (2009) Choking on the money: Reward-based performance decrements are associated with midbrain activity. Psych. Sci. 20(8):955–962.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morse A, Nanda V, Seru A (2011) Are incentive contracts rigged by powerful CEOs? J. Finance 66(5):1779–1821.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mowen JC, Middlemist RD, Luther D (1981) Joint effects of assigned goal level and incentive structure on task-performance: A laboratory study. J. Appl. Psych. 66(5):598–603.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pingitore R, Dugoni BL, Tindale RS, Spring B (1994) Bias against overweight job applicants in a simulated employment interview. J. Appl. Psych. 79(6):909–917.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prendergast C (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. J. Econom. Literature 37(1):7–63.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rummel A, Feinberg R (1988) Cognitive evaluation theory: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Sociol. Behav. Personality 16(2):147–164.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russ V (2012) School district’s PSSA test scores drop. Accessed April 22, 2013, http://articles.philly.com/2012-09-23/news/34041720_1_math-scores-charter-schools-budget-for-city-schools.Google Scholar
• Rynes SL, Colbert AE, Brown KG (2002) HR professionals’ beliefs about effective human resource practices: Correspondence between research and practice. Human Resource Management 41(2):149–174.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt FL, Hunter JE (1998) The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psych. Bull. 124(2):262–274.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Settimi C (2008) The executive recruitment trap. Accessed April 22, 2013, http://www.forbes.com/2008/12/19/recruiting-executive-chief-leadership-governance-cx_cs_1219recruit.html.Google Scholar
• Slovic P, MacPhillamy DJ (1974) Dimensional commensurability and cue utilization in comparative judgment. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 11(2):172–194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutherland B (2013) Whole Foods’ Mackey says employees should come before investors. Accessed April 22, 2013, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-18/whole-foods-mackey-says-employees-should-come-before-investors.html.Google Scholar
• Tang SH, Hall VC (1995) The overjustification effect: A meta-analysis. Appl. Cognitive Psych. 9(5):365–404.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tetlock PE (2005) Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Google Scholar
• Weber R, Camerer C, Rottenstreich Y, Knez M (2001) The illusion of leadership: Misattribution of cause in coordination games. Organ. Sci. 12(5):582–598.Link, Google Scholar
• Weibel A, Rost K, Osterloh M (2010) Pay for performance in the public sector benefits and (hidden) costs. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 20(2):387–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiersma UJ (1992) The effects of extrinsic rewards in intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. J. Occupational Organ. Psych. 65(2):101–114.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright M, Armstrong JS (2008) The ombudsman: Verification of citations: Fawlty towers of knowledge? Interfaces 38(2):125–139.Link, Google Scholar
• Yermack D (1997) Good timing: CEO stock option awards and company news announcements. J. Finance 52(2):449–476.Crossref, Google Scholar