The Ombudsman: The “Wicked” Environment of CEO Pay
References
- (2009) Predicting elections: Child’s play! Science 323(5918):1183.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1967) Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. J. Abnormal Psych. 72(3):193–204.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1978) Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psych. Rev. 85(5):395–416.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (1994) Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. Amer. Psychologist 49(8):725–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2001) Educating Intuition (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
- (2013) The “wicked” environment of CEO pay. Working paper, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.Google Scholar
- (2013) Are top executives paid enough? An evidence-based review. Interfaces 43(6):580–589.Link, Google Scholar
- (2004) The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. J. Appl. Psych. 89(3):428–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2012) Executive compensation and corporate governance in the U.S.: Perceptions, facts and challenges. Research paper, Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago.Google Scholar
- (1982) Robust tests for heteroscedasticity based on regression quantiles. Econometrica 50(1):43–61.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2008) The stock market bubble, shareholders’ attribution bias and excessive top CEOs pay. J. Behav. Finance 9(2):62–71.Crossref, Google Scholar
- (2010) Illusory correlation in the remuneration of chief executive officers: It pays to play golf, and well. Working paper, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.Google Scholar
- (2013) Executive compensation: Where we are, and how we got there. Constantinides G, Harris M, Stulz R, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, Vol. 2A (Elsevier Science North Holland, Amsterdam), 211–356.Crossref, Google Scholar

