Equipment Selection for Surface Mining: A Review

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2013.0732

References

  • Abdel-Malek L, Resare LJ (2000) Algorithm based decision support system for the concerted selection of equipment in machining/assembly cells. Internat. J. Production Res. 38(2):323–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alarie S, Gamache M (2002) Overview of solution strategies used in truck dispatching systems for open pit mines. Internat. J. Surface Mining Reclamation Environ. 16(1):59–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amirkhanian S, Baker N (1992) Expert system for equipment selection for earth-moving operations. J. Construction Engrg. Management 118(2):318–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J, Crainic TG, Christiansen M (2009a) Service network design with asset management: Formulations and comparative analyses. Transportation Res. Part C 17(2):197–207.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J, Crainic TG, Christiansen M (2009b) Service network design with management and coordination of multiple fleets. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 193(2):377–389.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armacost AP, Barnhart C, Ware KA (2002) Composite variable formulations for express shipment service network design. Transportation Sci. 36(1):1–20.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baldacci R, Christofides N, Mingozzi A (2008) An exact algorithm for the vehicle routing problem based on the set partitioning formulation with additional cuts. Math. Programming 115(2):351–385.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandopadhyay S, Nelson M (1994) Multiple-criteria group decision support systems with application to a surface mine equipment selection problem. Ramani RV, Mozumdar BK, Samadda AB, eds. Computers in the Mineral Industry (A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), 111–126.Google Scholar
  • Bandopadhyay S, Venkatasubramanian P (1987) Expert system as decision aid in surface mine equipment selection. Internat. J. Surface Mining 1(2):159–165.Google Scholar
  • Barnhart C, Schneur RR (1996) Air network design for express shipment service. Oper. Res. 44(6):852–863.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barnhart C, Krishnan N, Kim D, Ware K (2002) Network design for express shipment delivery. Comput. Optim. Appl. 21(3):239–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Başçetin A (2004) An application of the analytic hierarchy process in equipment selection at Orhaneli open pit coal mine. Mining Tech. 113(3):192–199.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Başçetin A, Kesimal A (1999) The study of a fuzzy set theory for the selection of an optimum coal transportation system from pit to the power plant. Internat. J. Surface Mining Reclamation Environ. 13(3):97–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Başçetin A, Öztaş O, Kanlı AI (2004) A new developed software for equipment selection in mining engineering. Hardygora M, Paszkowska G, Sikora M, eds. Mine Planning Equipment Selection 2004: Proc. Thirteenth Internat. Sympos. Mine Planning Equipment Selection (A. A. Balkema, London), 527–536.Google Scholar
  • Baxter M, Brown M, Gan H-S (2010) A decision support tool for equipment replacement in forestry harvesting operations. Accessed October 1, 2013, https://secure.orsnz.org.nz/conf45/index.php.Google Scholar
  • Bazzazi AA, Osanloo M, Karimi B (2009) Optimal open pit mining equipment selection using fuzzy multiple attribute decision making approach. Arch. Mining Sci. 54(2):301–320.Google Scholar
  • Bennett DP, Yano CA (2004) A decomposition approach for an equipment selection and multiple product routing problem incorporating environmental factors. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(3):643–664.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bienstock D (2002) Potential Function Methods for Approximately Solving Linear Programming Problems: Theory and Practice (Kluwer Academic, Boston).Google Scholar
  • Bienstock D, Günlük O (1995) Computational experience with a difficult mixed-integer multicommodity flow problem. Math. Programming 68(1–3):213–237.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bienstock D, Günlük O (1996) Capacitated network design—Polyhedral structure and computation. INFORMS J. Comput. 8(3):243–259.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bienstock D, Muratore G (2000) Strong inequalities for capacitated survivable network design problems. Math. Programming 89(1):127–147.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bitarafan M, Ataei M (2004) Mining method selection by multiple criteria decision making tools. J. South African Inst. Mining Metallurgy 104(9):493–498.Google Scholar
  • Blackwell GH (1999) Estimation of large open pit haulage truck requirements. CIM Bull. 92(1028):143–148.Google Scholar
  • Bodon P, Fricke C, Sandeman T, Stanford C (2011) Modeling the mining supply chain from mine to port: A combined optimization and simulation approach. J. Mining Sci. 47(2):202–211.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boland N, Krishnamoorthy M, Ernst A, Ebery J (2004) Preprocessing and cutting for multiple allocation hub location problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 155(3):638–653.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bozorgebrahimi A, Hall R, Morin M (2005) Equipment size effects on open pit mining performance. Internat. J. Surface Mining Reclamation Environ. 19(1):41–56.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Büdenbender K, Grünert T, Sebastian H-J (2000) A hybrid tabu search/branch-and-bound algorithm for the direct flight network design problem. Transportation Sci. 34(4):364–380.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burt C (2008) An optimisation approach to materials handling in surface mines. Accessed October 1, 2013, http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au:80/R?func=dbin-jump-full&local_base=gen01-era02&object_id=165737.Google Scholar
  • Burt C, Caccetta L, Fouché L, Welgama P (2013) An MILP approach to multi-location, multi-period equipment selection for surface mining with case studies. Accessed October 1, http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_HTML/2013/06/3931.html.Google Scholar
  • Burt C, Caccetta L, Welgama P, Fouché L (2011) Equipment selection with heterogeneous fleets for multiple period schedules. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 62(8):1498–1509.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt CN, Caccetta L (2007) Match factor for heterogeneous truck and loader fleets. Internat. J. Mining Reclamation Environ. 21(4):62–270.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caccetta L, Hill S (2003) An application of branch and cut to open pit mine scheduling. J. Global Optim. 27(2–3):349–365.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caramia M, Guerriero F (2009) A heuristic approach to long-haul freight transportation with multiple objective functions. Omega 37(3):600–614.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caterpillar (2003) Caterpillar Performance Handbook, 34th ed. (Caterpillar Inc., Peoria, IL).Google Scholar
  • Cebesoy T (1997) Surface mining equipment cost analysis with a developed linear break even model. Internat. J. Surface Mining Reclamation Environ. 11(2):53–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cebesoy T, Gözen M, Yahşi S (1995) A systematic decision making model for optimum surface mining equipment selection. Singhal RK, Mehrotra AK, Hadjigeorgiou J, Poulin R, eds. Mine Planning Equipment Selection 1995: Proc. Fourth Internat. Sympos. Mine Planning Equipment Selection (A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), 369–377.Google Scholar
  • Çelebi N (1998) An equipment selection and cost analysis system for open pit coal mines. Internat. J. Surface Mining Reclamation Environ. 12(4):181–187.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen M (1999) A heuristic for solving manufacturing process and equipment selection problems. Internat. J. Production Res. 37(2):359–374.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clément S, Vagenas N (1994) Use of genetic algorithms in a mining problem. Internat. J. Surface Mining Reclamation Environ. 8(4):131–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohn AEM (2002) Composite-variable modeling for large-scale problems in transportation and logistics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Cordeau J-F, Iori M, Laporte G, Gonzalez JJS (2007) A branch-and-cut algorithm for the pickup and delivery traveling salesman problem with LIFO loading. Technical report, CIRRELT, Montreal.Google Scholar
  • Crainic TG, Gendreau M, Farvolden JM (2000) A simplex-based tabu search method for capacitated network design. INFORMS J. Comput. 12(3):223–236.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Croxton KL, Gendron B, Magnanti TL (2003) Models and methods for merge-in-transit operations. Transportation Sci. 37(1):1–22.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Czaplicki JM (1992) On a number of spare haulage units for the shovel-truck system in open pit mines. Internat. J. Surface Mining Reclamation Environ. 6(2):57–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahl S, Derigs U (2009) Planning in express carrier networks: A simulation study. Fleischmann B, Borgwardt K, Klein R, eds. Oper. Res. Proc. 2008: Selected Papers Ann. Internat. Conf. German Oper. Res. Soc. (GOR) (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg), 259–264.Google Scholar
  • Denby B, Schofield D (1990) Applications of expert systems in equipment selection for surface mine design. Internat. J. Surface Mining Reclamation 4(4):165–171.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Derigs U, Friederichs S, Schäfer S (2009) A new approach for air cargo network planning. Transportation Sci. 43(3):370–380.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Douglas J (1964) Prediction of shovel-truck production: A reconciliation of computer and conventional estimates. Technical report, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  • Dunston PS, Sinfield JV, Lee T-Y (2007) Technology development decision economics for real-time rolling resistance monitoring of haul roads. J. Construction Engrg. Management 133(5):393–402.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Easa SM (1988) Earthwork allocations with linear unit costs. J. Construction Engrg. Management 114(4):641–655.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards D, Malekzadeh H, Yisa S (2001) A linear programming decision tool for selecting the optimum excavator. Structural Survey 19(2):113–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eldin N, Mayfield J (2005) Determination of most economical scrapers fleet. J. Construction Engrg. Management 131(10):1109–1114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein R, Gaete S, Caro F, Weintraub A, Santibanez P, Catalan J (2003) Optimizing long term planning for underground copper mines. Proc. Copper 2003-Cobre 2003, 5th Internat. Conf., Vol. I (Chilean Institute of Mining, Santiago, Chile), 265–279.Google Scholar
  • Equi L, Gallo G, Marziale S, Weintraub A (1997) A combined transportation and scheduling problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 97(1):94–104.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erçelebi S, Kırmanlı C (2000) Review of surface mining equipment selection techniques. Panagiotou G, Michalakopoulos T, eds. Mine Planning Equipment Selection 2000: Proc. Ninth Internat. Sympos. Mine Planning Equipment Selection (A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), 547–553.Google Scholar
  • Farid F, Koning TL (1994) Simulation verifies queuing program for selecting loader-truck fleets. J. Construction Engrg. Management 120(2):386–404.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frangioni A, Gendron B (2009) 0–1 reformulations of the multicommodity capacitated network design problem. Discrete Appl. Math. 157(6):1229–1241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frangioni A, Gendron B (2010) A stabilized structured Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition method. Technical report, CIRRELT, Montreal.Google Scholar
  • Fricke C (2006) Applications of integer programming in open pit mining. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  • Frimpong S, Asa E, Szymanski J (2002) Intelligent modeling: Advances in open pit mine design and optimization research. Internat. J. Surface Mining Reclamation Environ. 16(2):134–143.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galiano G, Kaihara T, Liotta G, Stecca G (2010) A comprehensive model for short-haul and long-haul transportation. Indust. Informatics (INDIN), 2010 8th IEEE Internat. Conf. (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington, DC),939–944.Google Scholar
  • Gambardella L, Mastrolilli M, Rizzoli A, Zaffalon M (2002) Managing resource allocation, scheduling and simulation for an intermodal container terminal. J. Belgian Oper. Res. Soc. 40(3–4):195–209.Google Scholar
  • Ganguli R, Bandopadhyay S (2002) Expert system for equipment selection. Internat. J. Surface Mining Reclamation Environ. 16(3):163–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gendron B, Crainic T, Frangioni A (1998) Multicommodity capacitated network design. Sanso B, Soriano P, eds. Telecommunications Network Planning (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands), 1–19.Google Scholar
  • Gleixner A (2008) Solving large-scale open pit mining production scheduling problems by integer programming. Unpublished masters thesis, Technische Universität, Berlin.Google Scholar
  • Griffis FH Jr (1968) Optimizing haul fleet size using queueing theory. J. Construction Engrg. Division 94(1):41–54.Google Scholar
  • Halatchev R (2002) The time aspect of the optimum long-term open pit production sequencing. Bandopadhyay S, ed. Appl. Comput. Oper. Res. Mineral Industry (Society of Mining Engineers, Littleton, CO), 133–146.Google Scholar
  • Hall RA, Daneshmend LK (2003) Reliability modelling of surface mining equipment: Data gathering and analysis methodologies. Internat. J. Surface Mining Reclamation Environ. 17(3):139–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hane C, Barnhart C, Johnson E, Marsten R, Nemhauser G, Sigismondi G (1995) The fleet assignment problem: Solving a large-scale integer program. Math. Programming 70(1–3):211–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hassan M, Hogg G, Smith D (1985) A construction algorithm for the selection and assignment of materials handling equipment. Internat. J. Production Res. 23(2):381–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hewitt M (2009) Integer programming based search. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  • Huang Y, Kumar U (1994) Optimising the number of load-haul-dump machines in a Swedish mine. Pasamehmetoglu A, ed. Mine Planning Equipment Selection 1994: Proc. Third Internat. Sympos. Mine Planning Equipment Selection (A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), 353–358.Google Scholar
  • Ileri Y (2006) Drayage optimization in truck/rail networks. Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  • Immersive Technologies (2012) Accessed October 15, http://www.immersivetechnologies.com/.Google Scholar
  • Irnich S (2002) Netzwerk-design für zweistufige transportsysteme und einurk branch-and-price-verfahren für das gemischte direkt-und hubflugproblem. Doctoral dissertation, Lehrstuhl für Unternehmensforschung, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule, Aachen, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Karimi SM, Mousavi SJ, Kaveh A, Afshar A (2007) Fuzzy optimization model for earthwork allocations with imprecise parameters. J. Construction Engrg. Management 133(2):181–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karshenas S (1989) Truck capacity selection for earthmoving. J. Construction Engrg. Management 115(2):212–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy BA, ed. (1990) Surface Mining, 2nd ed. (Society for Mining Metallurgy and Exploration Inc., Littleton, CO).Google Scholar
  • Kesimal A (1998) Shovel-truck productivity and efficiency studies for overburden removal in an open-pit coal mine. Trans. Inst. Mining Metallurgy, Section A: Mining Industry 107:A37–A40.Google Scholar
  • Khan R (2006) Selection of material handling equipment. Masters thesis, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  • Kim D (1997) Large scale transportation service network design: Models, algorithms and applications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  • Kumral M, Dowd P (2005) A simulated annealing approach to mine production scheduling. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56(8):922–930.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Land A, Doig A (1960) An automatic method of solving discrete programming problems. Econometrica 28(3):497–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leontidis M, Patmanidou B (2000) Cost estimation of earthmoving done by hydraulic shovels and trucks in mines. Panagiotou G, Michalakopoulos T, eds. Mine Planning Equipment Selection 2000: Proc. Ninth Internat. Sympos. Mine Planning Equipment Selection (A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), 631–634.Google Scholar
  • Lübbecke ME, Desrosiers J (2005) Selected topics in column generation. Oper. Res. 53(6):1007–1023.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mamer JW, McBride RD (2000) A decomposition-based pricing procedure for large-scale linear programs: An application to the linear multicommodity flow problem. Management Sci. 46(5):693–709.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Markeset T, Kumar U (2000) Application of LCC techniques in selection of mining equipment and technology. Panagiotou G, Michalakopoulos T, eds. Mine Planning Equipment Selection 2000: Proc. Ninth Internat. Sympos. Mine Planning Equipment Selection (A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), 635–640.Google Scholar
  • Marzouk M, Moselhi O (2002a) Selecting earthmoving equipment fleets using genetic algorithms. Yucesan E, Chen C, Snowdon J, Charnes J, eds. Proc. 2002 Winter Simulation Conf., Vol. 2 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington, DC), 1789–1796.Google Scholar
  • Marzouk M, Moselhi O (2002b) Simulation optimization for earthmoving operations using genetic algorithms. Construction Management Econom. 20(6):535–543.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marzouk M, Moselhi O (2004) Multiobjective optimization of earthmoving operations. J. Construction Engrg. Management 130(1):105–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Michiotis A, Xerocostas D, Galitis N (1998) A new integrated system for selecting mining equipment. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 34(2):391–397.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mirhosseyni SHL, Web P (2009) A hybrid fuzzy knowledge-based expert system and genetic algorithm for efficient selection and assignment of material handling equipment. Expert Systems Appl. 36(9):11875–11887.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitrović-Minić S, Krishnamurti R, Laporte G (2004) Double-horizon based heuristics for the dynamic pickup and delivery problem with time windows. Transportation Res. 38(8):669–685.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moccia L, Cordeau J-F, Laporte G, Ropke S, Valentini M (2011) Modeling and solving a multimodal transportation problem with flexible-time and scheduled services. Networks 57(1):53–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montemanni R, Gambardella L (2005) Exact algorithms for the minimum power symmetric connectivity problem in wireless networks. Comput. Oper. Res. 32(11):2891–2904.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan B (1994a) Cost effective equipment applications zones. Pasamehmetoglu A, ed. Mine Planning Equipment Selection 1994: Proc. Third Internat. Sympos. Mine Planning Equipment Selection (A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), 323–328.Google Scholar
  • Morgan B (1994b) Optimizing truck-loader matching. Pasamehmetoglu A, ed. Mine Planning Equipment Selection 1994: Proc. Third Internat. Sympos. Mine Planning Equipment Selection (A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), 313–320.Google Scholar
  • Moselhi O, Alshibani A (2009) Optimization of earthmoving operations in heavy civil engineering projects. J. Construction Engrg. Management 135(10):948–954.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Naoum S, Haidar A (2000) A hybrid knowledge base system and genetic algorithms for equipment selection. Engrg. Construction Architectural Management 7(1):3–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nassar K (2001) Managing construction equipment buy and sell decisions replacement: A simulation game. ASC Proc. 37th Ann. Conf. (Associated Schools of Construction, Hattiesburg, MS), 187–198.Google Scholar
  • Newman AM, Rubio E, Caro R, Weintraub A, Eurek K (2010) A review of operations research in mine planning. Interfaces 40(3):222–245.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • O’Hara T, Suboleski S (1992) Costs and cost estimation. Hartman HL, ed. SME Mining Engineering Handbook, Vol. 2. (Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Littleton, CO), 405–424.Google Scholar
  • O’Shea JB (1964) An application of the theory of queues to the forecasting of shovel-truck fleet productions. Masters thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  • Pedersen MB, Crainic TG (2007) Optimization of intermodal freight train service schedules on train canals. Technical report, CIRRELT, Montreal.Google Scholar
  • Powell WB, Sheffi Y (1989) Design and implementation of an interactive optimization system for network design in the motor carrier industry. Oper. Res. 37(1):12–29.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Preuss M, Hellingrath B (2010) Tactical planning of sustainable transportation by logistics service providers for the automotive industry. Sihn W, ed. Proc. 43rd Internat. Conf. Manufacturing Systems (NWV Neuer Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Vienna),252–262.Google Scholar
  • Raack C, Koster A, Orlowski S, Wessäly R (2011) On cut-based inequalities for capacitated network design polyhedra. Networks 57(2):141–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rajagopalan S (1998) Capacity expansion and equipment replacement: A unified approach. Oper. Res. 46(6):846–857.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Raman D, Nagalingam S, Gurd B, Lin G (2009) Quantity of material handling equipment: A queuing theory based approach. Robotics Comput. Integrated Manufacturing 25(2):348–357.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Savelsbergh M, Sol M (1998) Drive: Dynamic routing of independent vehicles. Oper. Res. 46(4):474–490.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schexnayder C, Weber S, Brooks B (1999) Effect of truck payload weight on production. J. Construction Engrg. Management 125(1):1–7.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith SD, Osborne JR, Forde MC (1995) Productivity estimation in back-acter/dump-truck earth-moving operations. Proc. Instit. Civil Engrg. Transport 111(2):125–131.Google Scholar
  • Smith SD, Wood GS, Gould M (2000) A new earthworks estimating methodology. Construction Management Econom. 18(2):219–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sung CS, Song SH (2003) Integrated service network design for a cross-docking supply chain network. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 54(12):1283–1295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ta C, Kresta J, Forbes J, Marquez H (2005) A stochastic optimization approach to mine truck allocation. Internat. J. Surface Mining Reclamation Environ. 19(3):162–175.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tan S, Ramani RV (1992) Optimization models for scheduling ore and waste production in open pit mines. Kim Y, ed. 23rd Appl. Comput. Oper. Res. Mineral Indust. (Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Littleton, CO), 781–791.Google Scholar
  • Tomlingson P (2000) Equipment replacement considerations. Panagiotou G, Michalakopoulos T, eds. Mine Planning Equipment Selection 2000: Proc. Ninth Internat. Sympos. Mine Planning Equipment Selection (A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), 691–693.Google Scholar
  • Topal E, Ramazan S (2010) A new MIP model for mine equipment scheduling by minimizing maintenance cost. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207(2):1065–1071.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Dam KH, Lukszo Z, Ferreira L, Sirikijpanichkul A (2007) Planning the location of intermodal freight hubs: An agent based approach. Proc. IEEE Internat. Conf. Networking Sensing Control (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Washington, DC), 187–192.Google Scholar
  • Webster D, Reed R (1971) A material handling system selection model. AIIE Trans. 3(1):13–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wei Y, Fan Y, Xu W (2003) An integrated methodology for decision making of mining method selection. Internat. J. Manufacturing Tech. Management 5(1–2):10–19.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiesemann W, Kuhn D, Rustem B (2010) Maximizing the net present value of a project under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202(2):356–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xinchun L, Weicheng Z, Youdi Z (2004) Application of genetic algorithm to optimize the number and size of equipment of surface mine. Hardygóra M, Paszkowska G, Sikora M, eds. Mine Planning Equipment Selection 2004: Proc. Thirteenth, Internat. Sympos. Mine Planning Equipment Selection (A. A. Balkema, London), 637–639.Google Scholar
  • Zhang R, Yun WY, Kopfer H (2010) Heuristic-based truck scheduling for inland container transportation. OR Spectrum 32(3):787–808.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Y (2010) Advances in LTL load plan design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.Google Scholar
  • Zhongzhou L, Qining L (1988) Erlangian cyclic queueing model for shovel-truck haulage systems. Singhal R, ed. Mine Planning Equipment Selection (A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands), 423–428.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.