Guiding School-Choice Reform through Novel Applications of Operations Research

References

• Abdulkadiroğlu A, Sönmez T (2003) School choice: A mechanism design approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(3):729–747.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Abdulkadiroğlu A, Pathak PA, Roth AE, Sönmez T (2006) Changing the Boston school choice mechanism. Boston College Working Papers in Economics 639. Boston College Department of Economics, Boston.Google Scholar
• Alves MJ, Willie CV (1990) Choice, decentralization, and desegregation: The Boston “controlled choice plan.” Witte JF, Clune WH, eds. Choice and Control in American Education, Volume 2: The Practice of Choice, Decentralization, and School Restructuring (The Falmer Press, New York), 17–75.Google Scholar
• Ashlagi I, Shi P (2013) Improving community cohesion in school choice via correlated-lottery implementation. Accessed August 4, 2014, http://www.mit.edu/~pengshi/papers/community-cohesion.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ashlagi I, Shi P (2015) Optimal allocation without money: An engineering approach. Management Sci. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Beggs S, Cardell S, Hausman J (1981) Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. J. Econometrics 17(1):1–19.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boston Public Schools (2013) Preliminary transportation analysis. Accessed February 4, 2014, http://bostonschoolchoice.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/2013-02-20-transportation-cost-analysis-final.pdf.Google Scholar
• Burge K (2012) Study finds inequities in schools’ zone plans. Accessed October 30, 2012, http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2012/09/30/boston-school-redistricting-proposals-will-create-more-inequity-according-harvard-analysis/eLEADOQyNBQUTrl8yQHV2L/story.html.Google Scholar
• Dubins LE, Freedman DA (1981) Machiavelli and the Gale-Shapley algorithm. Amer. Math. Monthly 88(7):485–494.Crossref, Google Scholar
• EAC (2013) Recommendations by the external advisory committee on school choice. Accessed March 31, 2013, http://bostonschoolquality.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/eac-recommendations-final-2-27-2013.pdf.Google Scholar
• Ebbert S, Russell J (2011) A daily diaspora, a scattered street. Accessed June 4, 2012, http://www.boston.com/news/education/k_12/articles/2011/06/12/on_one_city_street_school_choice_creates_a_gap/.Google Scholar
• Gale D, Shapley LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1):9–14.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hausman JA, Ruud PA (1987) Specifying and testing econometric models for rank-ordered data. J. Econometrics 34(1):83–104.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson C (2013) Superintendent’s statement on external advisory committee on school choice recommendation. Accessed March 31, 2013, http://bostonschoolchoice.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/2-27-13-superintendent-eac-statement.pdf.Google Scholar
• Landsmark T, Dajer H, Gonsalves L, Acevedo S, Bakken M, Chu H, Groover Get al. (2004) Report and recommendations of the boston public schools. Technical report, 2004 Student Assignment Task Force, Boston.Google Scholar
• Levinson M, Noonan J, Fay J, Mantil A, Johnston W, Buttimer C, Mehta J (2012) First-round analysis of BPS proposed 6-zone, 9-zone, 11-zone, and 23-zone school assignment plans. Technical report, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Boston.Google Scholar
• Lilly D (2009) It’s back to neighborhood schools for Seattle. Accessed April 30, 2012, http://crosscut.com/2009/10/07/seattle-schools/19286/Its-back-neighborhood-schools-for-Seattle/.Google Scholar
• McFadden D, Talvitie A, Cosslett S, Hasan I, Johnson M, Reid F, Train K (1977) Demand model estimation and validation. Report, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
• Menino T (2012) The honorable mayor Thomas M. Menino State of the City Address. Accessed January 31, 2012, https://data.cityofboston.gov/dataset/State-Of-The-City-Address-2012-Mayor-Thomas-Menino/7w3j-67fs.Google Scholar
• Pathak PA, Shi P (2013) Simulating alternative school choice options in Boston. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School Effectiveness and Inequality Initiative, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Pathak PA, Shi P (2014) Demand modeling, forecasting, and counterfactuals, part i. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Roth AE (1982) The economics of matching: Stability and incentives. Math. Oper. Res. 7(4):617–628.Link, Google Scholar
• Roth AE, Sotomayor MAO (1990) Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Russell J, Ebbert S (2011) The high price of school assignment. Accessed February 4, 2012, http://www.boston.com/news/education/k_12/articles/2011/06/12/the_high_price_of_school_assignment/.Google Scholar
• Russell J, Ebbert S, Vaznis J (2011) Getting in: Inside Boston’s school assignment maze. Accessed February 7, 2012, http://www.boston.com/news/education/specials/school_chance/articles/.Google Scholar
• Seelye KQ (2013) Boston schools revise ‘70s busing system. New York Times (March 15):A17.Google Scholar
• Vaznis J (2012) 5 new plans to assign Boston students. Boston Globe (September 24):A1.Google Scholar
• Vaznis J (2013) Boston adopts new school assignment plan. Boston Globe (March 14):A1.Google Scholar
• Woodward M (2011) Southeast Seattle schools: World War II to present. Accessed August 30, 2012, http://www.seattle.gov/neighborhoods/preservation/southeastseattle.Google Scholar