ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Academia-Industry Interfacing in Operations Research in Montréal

References

• Akrich M, Callon M, Latour B (2002) The key to success in innovation. Part II: The art of choosing good spokespersons. Internat. J. Innovation Management 6(2):207–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blais J-Y, Rousseau J-M (1982) HASTUS: A model for the economic evaluation of drivers’ collective agreement in transit companies. INFOR 20(1):3–15.Google Scholar
• Blais J-Y, Lamont J, Rousseau M (1990) The HASTUS vehicle and manpower scheduling system at the Société de transport de la Communauté urbaine de Montréal. Interfaces 20(1):26–42.Link, Google Scholar
• Bollapragada S (2011) From the editor. Interfaces 41(1):1–2.Link, Google Scholar
• Brotcorne L, Labbé M, Marcotte P, Savard G (2000) A bilevel model and algorithm for a freight tariff-setting problem. Transportation Sci. 34(3):289–302.Link, Google Scholar
• Côté M-C, Gendron B, Rousseau L-M (2013) Grammar-based column generation for personalized multi-activity shift scheduling. INFORMS J. Comput. 25(3):461–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Desaulniers G, Desrosiers J, Solomon MM (2005) Column Generation (Springer, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Desrochers M, Soumis F (1989) A column generation approach to the urban transit crew scheduling problem. Transportation Sci. 23(1):1–13.Link, Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J (2001) Air Canada reaches “altitude”: Preferential bidding system helps carrier integrate 1,400 pilots following acquisition of canadian airlines. OR/MS Today 28(2):54–56.Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J (2010) GENCOL: Une équipe et un logiciel d’optimisation. Accessed July 17, 2014, http://studia.complexica.net/Art/RI080204.pdf.Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Lasry A, McInnis D, Solomon MM, Soumis F (2000) Air Transat uses ALTITUDE to manage its aircraft routing, crew pairing, and work assignment. Interfaces 30(2):41–53.Link, Google Scholar
• Florian M (1977) A traffic equilibrium model of travel by car and public transit modes. Transportation Sci. 11(2):166–179.Link, Google Scholar
• Florian M, Nguyen S (1978) A combined trip distribution, modal split and trip assignment model. Transportation Res. 12(4):241–246.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Florian M, Spiess H (1983) On binary mode choice/assignment models. Transportation Sci. 17(1):32–47.Link, Google Scholar
• Gratton AA, Luc D, Filion LJ (2007) L’essaimage d’AD OPT Technologies Inc.: un levier économique pour le GERAD de HEC Montréal. Centre de cas HEC Montréal, HEC Montréal, Quebec.Google Scholar
• Hsieh PN, Chang PL (2010) An assessment of world-wide research productivity in production and operations management. Internat. J. Production Econom. 120(2):540–551.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Labbé M, Marcotte P, Savard G (1998) A bilevel model of taxation and its application to optimal highway pricing. Management Sci. 44(12, Pt. 1):1608–1622.Link, Google Scholar
• Lacroix B, Desrosiers J (2004) Altitude manpower planning: An integrated system that addresses the puzzle of planning a crew force. OR/MS Today 31(2).Google Scholar
• Lockett A, Wright M (2005) Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Res. Policy 34(7):1043–1057.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller DM (2010) A quarter of a century of academia–industry interfacing: The Alabama Productivity Center. Interfaces 40(6):424–431.Link, Google Scholar
• Proulx D (2015) GIRO: Pas question de ménager vos transport. Accessed June 1, 2015, http://argent.canoe.ca/pme/giro-pas-question-de-menager-vos-transports-19012015.Google Scholar
• Rothkopf MH (1999) Editorial: The third Interfaces ranking of universities’ contributions to the practice literature. Interfaces 29(6):107–111.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf MH (2004) Editorial: The fifth Interfaces ranking of universities’ contributions to the practice literature. Interfaces 34(2):135–138.Link, Google Scholar
• Rothkopf MH (2005) Editorial: The sixth Interfaces ranking of universities’ contribution to the practice literature. Interfaces 35(5):425–428.Link, Google Scholar
• Rousseau L-M, Gendreau M, Pesant G (2002) A general approach to the physician rostering problem. Ann. Oper. Res. 115(1–4):193–205.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roy G, Filion LJ (2004a) AD OPT Technologies (A): le statut de professeur-entrepreneur. Centre de cas HEC Montréal, HEC Montréal, Quebec.Google Scholar
• Roy G, Filion LJ (2004b) AD OPT Technologies (B): Un essaimage à partenaires multiples. Centre de cas HEC Montréal, HEC Montréal, Quebec.Google Scholar
• Roy G, Filion LJ (2005) Les entreprises GIRO inc.: Un essaimage avant-gardiste. Centre de cas HEC Montréal, HEC Montréal, Quebec.Google Scholar
• Savary I, Luc D, Filion LJ (2002) De Polyvalor à Univalor: Une valorisation accrue du transfert technologique. Centre de cas HEC Montréal, HEC Montréal, Quebec.Google Scholar
• Vohora A, Wright M, Lockett A (2004) Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Res. Policy 33(1):147–175.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright M, Vohora A, Lockett A (2004) The formation of high-tech university spinouts: The role of joint ventures and venture capital investors. J. Tech. Transfer 29(3–4):287–310.Crossref, Google Scholar