Maximizing the U.S. Army’s Future Contribution to Global Security Using the Capability Portfolio Analysis Tool (CPAT)

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2015.0824

References

  • Adams WP, Henry SM (2012) Base-2 expansions for linearizing products of functions of discrete variables. Oper. Res. 60(6):1477–1490.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Adams WP, Sherali HD (2005) A hierarchy of relaxations leading to the convex hull representation for general discrete optimization problems. Ann. Oper. Res. 140(1):21–47.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balas E (1979) Disjunctive programming. Ann. Discrete Math. 5(1979):3–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brink TL, Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1994) Decisions with Multiple Objectives-Preferences and Value Tradeoffs (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Edwards SB, Haas BJ (2011) Program executive office ground combat systems (PEO GCS) capability portfolio analysis tool (CPAT). 79th MORS Sympos. 2011 (Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA).Google Scholar
  • Erwin SI (2011) Army’s ground combat vehicle: The saga continues. National Defense 96(695):32(4).Google Scholar
  • Henry SM, Muldoon FM, Hoffman MJ, Kao GK, Lawton CR, Melander DJ, Rice RE, Shelton L (2015) The Capability Portfolio Analysis Tool (CPAT): A mixed integer linear programming formulation for fleet modernization analysis. Report #SAND2015-3487, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  • Jean GV (2011) Army’s ground combat vehicle stirs confusion in industry. National Defense (January), http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/archive/2011/January/Pages/Army%E2%80%99sGroundCombatVehicleStirsConfusionInIndustry.aspx.Google Scholar
  • Kirkwood CW (1997) Strategic Decision Making: Mulitobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets (Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
  • Melander DJ, Henry SM, Hoffman MJ, Kao GK, Lawton CR, Muldoon FM, Rice RE, Shelton L (2015) The CPAT domain model—How CPAT “thinks” from an analyst perspective. Report #SAND2015-4009, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  • Parnell GS, Trainor T (2009) Using the swing weight matrix to weight multiple objectives. Proc. INCOSE Internat. Symposium, Singapore, 283–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Congress (2011) Budget control act of 2011. Accessed June 1, 2015, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112s365enr/pdf/BILLS-112s365enr.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Veilma JP, Ahmed S, Nemhauser G (2010) Mixed-integer models for nonseparable piecewise-linear optimization: Unifying framework and extensions. Oper. Res. 58(2):303–315.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.