SGICT Builds an Optimization-Based System for Daily Berth Planning

References

• Bierwirth C, Meisel F (2010) A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202(3):615–627.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bierwirth C, Meisel F (2015) A follow-up survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 244(3):675–689.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlo HJ, Vis IFA, Roodbergen KJ (2013) Seaside operations in container terminals: Literature overview, trends, and research directions. Flexible Services Manufacturing J. 27(2):224–262.Google Scholar
• Chen JH, Lee DH, Cao JX (2012) A combinatorial benders’ cuts algorithm for the quayside operation problem at container terminals. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 48(1):266–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cordeau JF, Laporte G, Legato P, Moccia L (2005) Models and tabu search heuristics for the berth-allocation problem. Transportation Sci. 39(4):526–538.Link, Google Scholar
• Du Y, Chen Q, Lam JSL, Xu Y, Cao JX (2015) Modeling the impacts of tides and the virtual arrival policy in berth allocation. Transportation Sci. 49(4):939–956.Link, Google Scholar
• Emde S, Boysen N, Briskorn D (2014) The berth allocation problem with mobile quay walls: Problem definition, solution procedures, and extensions. J. Scheduling 17(3):289–303.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gharehgozli AH, Roy D, de Koster R (2015) Sea container terminals: New technologies and OR models. Maritime Econom. Logist., ePub ahead of print April 23, http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/mel.2015.3.Google Scholar
• Giallombardo G, Moccia L, Salani M, Vacca I (2010) Modeling and solving the tactical berth allocation problem. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 44(2):232–245.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gorman MF, Clarke JP, Gharehgozli AH, Hewitt M, de Koster R, Roy D (2014) State of the practice: A review of the application of OR/MS in freight transportation. Interfaces 44(6):535–554.Link, Google Scholar
• Hoffarth L, Voß S (1994) Berth allocation in a container terminal—Development of a decision support system (in German). Dyckhoff H, Derigs U, Salomon M, Tijms HC, eds. Operations Research Proc. 1993 (Springer, Berlin), 89–95.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai A, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2003) Berth allocation with service priority. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 37(5):437–457.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai A, Chen HC, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2008) The simultaneous berth and quay crane allocation problem. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 44(5):900–920.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai A, Sun X, Nishimura E, Papadimitriou S (2005) Berth allocation in a container port: Using a continuous location space approach. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 39(3):199–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim KH, Moon KC (2003) Berth scheduling by simulated annealing. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 37(6):541–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Legato P, Mazza RM, Trunfio R (2013) Medcenter container terminal SpA uses simulation in housekeeping operations. Interfaces 43(4):313–324.Link, Google Scholar
• Meisel F, Bierwirth C (2009) Heuristics for the integration of crane productivity in the berth allocation problem. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 45(1):196–209.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meisel F, Bierwirth C (2013) A framework for integrated berth allocation and crane operations planning in seaport container terminals. Transportation Sci. 47(2):131–147.Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy R, Teo CP (2006) Berth management in container terminal: The template design problem. OR Spectrum 28(4):495–518.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park YM, Kim KH (2003) A scheduling method for berth and quay cranes. OR Spectrum 25(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stahlbock R, Voß S (2008) Operations research at container terminals: A literature update. OR Spectrum 30(1):1–52.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu D, Li CL, Leung JYT (2012) Berth allocation with time-dependent physical limitations on vessels. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 216(1):47–56.Crossref, Google Scholar