Practice Summary: Solving the External Candidates Exam Schedule in Norway

References

• Al-Hawari F, Al-Ashi M, Abawi F, Alouneh S (2020) A practical three-phase ILP approach for solving the examination timetabling problem. Internat. Trans. Oper. Res. 27(2):924–944.Google Scholar
• Arbaoui T, Boufflet J-P, Moukrim A (2019) Lower bounds and compact mathematical formulations for spacing soft constraints for university examination timetabling problems. Comput. Oper. Res. 106:133–142.Google Scholar
• Dunning I, Huchette J, Lubin M (2017) Jump: A modeling language for mathematical optimization. SIAM Rev. 59(2):295–320.Google Scholar
• Gurobi Optimization (2019) Gurobi optimizer reference manual.Google Scholar
• Müller T (2016) Real-life examination timetabling. J. Scheduling 19(3):257–270.Google Scholar
• Nemhauser G, Wolsey LA (1988) Integer programming and combinatorial optimization. (Wiley-Interscience).Google Scholar
• Qu R, Burke EK, McCollum B, Merlot LTG, Lee SY (2009) A survey of search methodologies and automated system development for examination timetabling. J. Scheduling 12(1):55–89.Google Scholar
• Wang S, Bussieck M, Guignard M, Meeraus A, O’Brien F (2010) Term-end exam scheduling at United States Military Academy/West Point. J. Scheduling 13(4):375–391.Google Scholar
• Woumans G, De Boeck L, Beliën J, Creemers S (2016) A column generation approach for solving the examination-timetabling problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 253(1):178–194.Google Scholar