Forming Student Teams to Incorporate Soft Skills and Commonality of Schedule

References

• Abdelsalam HM (2009) Multi-objective team forming optimization for integrated product development projects. Abraham A, Hassanien A-E, Siarry P, Engelbrecht A, eds. Foundations of Computational Intelligence, vol. 3 (Springer, Berlin), 461–478.Google Scholar
• Aminu N, Hamdan M, Russell C (2021) Accuracy of self-evaluation in a peer-learning environment: An analysis of a group learning model. SN Soc. Sci. 1(7):1–17.Google Scholar
• Armacost AP, Lowe JK (2003) Operations research capstone course: A project-based process of discovery and application. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 3(2):1–25.Link, Google Scholar
• Bacon DR, Stewart KA, Silver WS (1999) Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make the difference. J. Management Ed. 23(5):467–488.Google Scholar
• Baker KR, Powell SG (2002) Methods for assigning students to groups: A study of alternative objective functions. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 53(4):397–404.Google Scholar
• Baykasoglu A, Dereli T, Das S (2007) Project team selection using fuzzy optimization approach. Cybernetics Systems Internat. J. 38(2):155–185.Google Scholar
• Brass DJ (1985) Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Acad. Management J. 28(2):327–343.Google Scholar
• Coates G, Duffy A, Hills W, Whitfield R (2007) A preliminary approach for modelling and planning the composition of engineering project teams. Proc. Inst. Mech. Engineers Part B J. Engrg. Manufacture 221(7):1255–1265.Google Scholar
• Courtright SH, McCormick BW, Mistry S, Wang J (2017) Quality charters or quality members? A control theory perspective on team charters and team performance. J. Appl. Psych. 102(10):1462–1470.Google Scholar
• Cutshall R, Gavirneni S, Schultz K (2007) Indiana University’s Kelley School of Business uses integer programming to form equitable, cohesive student teams. Interfaces 37(3):265–276.Link, Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Mladenović N, Villeneuve D (2005) Design of balanced MBA student teams. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 56(1):60–66.Google Scholar
• Dewiyanti S, Brand-Gruwel S, Jochems W, Broers NJ (2007) Students’ experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Comput. Human Behav. 23(1):496–514.Google Scholar
• Dobosz RP, Beaty LA (1999) The relationship between athletic participation and high school students’ leadership ability. Adolescence 34(133):215–220.Google Scholar
• Durfee EH, Boerkoel JC Jr, Sleight J (2014) Using hybrid scheduling for the semi-autonomous formation of expert teams. Future Generation Comput. Systems 31:200–212.Google Scholar
• Gale D, Shapley LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Amer. Math. Monthly 69(1):9–15.Google Scholar
• Goleman D (2018) What makes a leader? Taylor RL, Rosenbach WE, Rosenbach EB, eds. Military Leadership, chapter 3 (Routledge, New York), 39–52.Google Scholar
• Gorman MF (2011) Student reactions to the field consulting capstone course in operations management at the University of Dayton. Interfaces 41(6):564–577.Link, Google Scholar
• Grandzol C, Perlis S, Drina L (2010) Leadership development of team captains in collegiate varsity athletics. Unpublished PhD thesis, Marywood University, Scranton, PA.Google Scholar
• Hackman JR (1990) Groups That Work and Those That Don’t (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
• Hall DJ, Cegielski CG, Wade JN (2006) Theoretical value belief, cognitive ability, and personality as predictors of student performance in object-oriented programming environments. Decision Sci. J. Innovative Ed. 4(2):237–257.Google Scholar
• Huang J, Sun X, Zhou Y, Sun H (2017) A team formation model with personnel work hours and project workload quantified. Comput. J. 60(9):1382–1394.Google Scholar
• Ignizio JP, Cavalier TM (1994) Linear Programming (Prentice-Hall, Inc.).Google Scholar
• Juarez J, Santos C, Brizuela CA (2021) A comprehensive review and a taxonomy proposal of team formation problems. ACM Comput. Surveys 54(7):1–33.Google Scholar
• Komives SR, Owen JE, Longerbeam SD, Mainella FC, Osteen L(2005) Developing a leadership identity: A grounded theory. J. College Student Development 46(6):593–611.Google Scholar
• Krass D, Ovchinnikov A (2006) The University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management uses management science to create MBA study groups. Interfaces 36(2):126–137.Link, Google Scholar
• Krass D, Ovchinnikov A (2010) Constrained group balancing: Why does it work. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 206(1):144–154.Google Scholar
• Krauss B, Lee J, Newman D (2013) Optimizing the assignment of students to classes in an elementary school. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 14(1):39–44.Link, Google Scholar
• Layton RA, Loughry ML, Ohland MW, Ricco GD (2010) Design and validation of a web-based system for assigning members of teams using instructor-specified criteria. Adv. Engrg. Ed. 2(1):1–28.Google Scholar
• Lopes L, Aronson M, Carstensen G, Smith C (2008) Optimization support for senior design project assignments. Interfaces 38(6):448–464.Link, Google Scholar
• Maass KL, Lo VMH, Weiss A, Daskin MS (2015) Maximizing diversity in the engineering global leadership cultural families. Interfaces 45(4):293–304.Link, Google Scholar
• Mabe PA, West SG (1982) Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. 67(3):280–296.Google Scholar
• Magnanti TL, Natarajan K (2018) Allocating students to multidisciplinary capstone projects using discrete optimization. Interfaces 48(3):204–216.Link, Google Scholar
• Moreno J, Ovalle DA, Vicari RM (2012) A genetic algorithm approach for group formation in collaborative learning considering multiple student characteristics. Comput. Ed. 58(1):560–569.Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, Reider MH, Campion MA (2005) Selecting individuals in team settings: The importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Personnel Psych. 58(3):583–611.Google Scholar
• Oakley B, Felder RM, Brent R, Elhajj I (2004) Turning student groups into effective teams. J. Student Centered Learn. 2(1):9–34.Google Scholar
• Patterson B (2012) Influences of student organizational leadership experiences in college students leadership behaviors. E-J. Organ. Learn. Leadership 10(1):1–12.Google Scholar
• Pilotte M, Kovaichelvan V, Chand S, Iyer A (2012) Global experiential projects with a manufacturer in India: Insights from five years of experience. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 13(1):31–43.Link, Google Scholar
• Porter MF (1980) An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program: Electronic Library Inform. Systems 14(3):130–137.Google Scholar
• Rand G, Ranyard J (2013) Preparing students for the world of OR work: Lancaster’s experience. Working paper, Lancaster University Management School, Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar
• Reagans R, Zuckerman E, McEvily B (2004) How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. 49(1):101–133.Google Scholar
• Regan JW, Gosselink H, Hubsch J, Ulsh E (1975) Do people have inflated views of their own ability? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 31(2):295–301.Google Scholar
• Routon PW, Walker JK (2016) Attitude changes and self-perceived skill gains from collegiate Greek organization membership. Soc. Sci. Quart. 97(3):807–822.Google Scholar
• Salisbury MH, Pascarella ET, Padgett RD, Blaich C (2012) The effects of work on leadership development among first-year college students. J. College Student Development 53(2):300–324.Google Scholar
• Skipper CO, Bell LC (2006) Influences impacting leadership development. J. Management Engrg. 22(2):68–74.Google Scholar
• Stevens MJ, Campion MA (1994) The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. J. Management 20(2):503–530.Google Scholar
• Stevens MJ, Campion MA (1999) Staffing work teams: Development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings. J. Management 25(2):207–228.Google Scholar
• Strnad D, Guid N (2010) A fuzzy-genetic decision support system for project team formation. Appl. Soft Comput. 10(4):1178–1187.Google Scholar
• Thomas RJ, Cheese P (2005) Leadership: Experience is the best teacher. Strategy Leadership 33(3):24–29.Google Scholar
• University of Tennessee (2021–2022) Undergraduate catalog. Accessed July 19, 2021, https://catalog.utk.edu/content.php?filter%5B27.Google Scholar
• Vanhoucke M (2010) Introducing optimization techniques to students: An exam case distribution model. INFORMS Trans. Ed. 10(2):53–61.Link, Google Scholar
• Zakarian A, Kusiak A (1999) Forming teams: An analytical approach. IIE Trans. 31(1):85–97.Google Scholar