General Motors Optimizes Vehicle Content for Customer Value and Profitability
Published Online:31 Jan 2023https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2022.1144
References
- (1992) Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2010) Overview: Product content planning, packaging and pricing optimization. Research report, General Motors, Warren, MI.Google Scholar
- (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.Google Scholar
- (2004) Differentiated products demand systems from a combination of micro and macro data: The new car market. J. Political Econom. 112(1):68–105.Google Scholar
- (2019) Applicability and use of artificial intelligence in business decision modeling. Research report, General Motors, Warren, MI.Google Scholar
- (2013) Bayesian Data Analysis, 3rd ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
- (2012) Introduction to Bayesian Econometrics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
- (1994) Using MPI: Portable Parallel Programming with the Message-Passing Interface (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2018) Applications of the consumer choice modeling and analytics platform (CCMAP). Research report, General Motors, Warren, MI.Google Scholar
- (2018) Discrete choice modeling tools for content optimization – CCMAP version 1 user guide. Research report, General Motors, Warren, MI.Google Scholar
- (2020) Advanced features in COTS 2.0 content optimization. Research report, General Motors, Warren, MI.Google Scholar
- (2005) The Art of Computer Programming, vol. 4 (Addison-Wesley, Boston).Google Scholar
- (1998) An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
- (2006) Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
- (1999) A comparison of conjoint methods when there are many attributes. Marketing Lett. 10(2):125–138.Google Scholar
- (1999) Monte Carlo Statistical Methods (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
- (2004) The Cross-Entropy Method (Springer, New York).Google Scholar
- (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks 61(January):85–117.Google Scholar
- (2022) Modeling customer utility with a neural network within a logit choice model. Research report, General Motors, Warren, MI.Google Scholar
- (2016) Customer preference summary metrics. Research report, General Motors, Warren, MI.Google Scholar
- (2018) Summary of methodological research findings for content optimization market research. Research report, General Motors, Warren, MI.Google Scholar
- (2019) Process for studying full-vehicle content for content optimization analysis. Research report, General Motors, Warren, MI.Google Scholar
- (2008) Practice prize winner—A nested logit model of product and transaction-type choice for planning automakers’ pricing and promotions. Marketing Sci. 27(4):545–566.Link, Google Scholar
- (2020) Uncertainty quantification in vehicle content optimization for General Motors. INFORMS J. Appl. Analytics 50(4):213–268.Google Scholar
- Stan Development Team (2021) Stan modeling language users guide and reference manual, v2.28. Accessed July 13, 2022, https://mc-stan.org/docs/2_30/stan-users-guide-2_30.pdf.Google Scholar
- (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
- (2007) Vehicle choice behavior and the declining market share of US automakers. Internat. Econom. Rev. 48(4):1469–1496.Google Scholar
- (2014) CCAT: Customer choice analysis tool and process. Research report, General Motors, Warren, MI.Google Scholar
- (2007) Greedoid-based non-compensatory inference. Marketing Sci. 26(4):532–549.Link, Google Scholar

