Part Feeding and Internal Transportation Decision Making for a Machinery Manufacturer

References

• Abdinnour S (2011) Hawker Beechcraft uses a new solution approach to balance assembly lines. Interfaces 41(2):164–176.Link, Google Scholar
• Adenipekun EO, Limère V, Schmid N (2020) A conceptual framework for the integration of assembly line feeding and route building. 34th Annual Eur. Simulation Model. Conf. (Eurosis, Ostend, Belgium), 163–167.Google Scholar
• Adenipekun EO, Limère V, Schmid NA (2022) The impact of transportation optimisation on assembly line feeding. Omega 107:102544.Google Scholar
• Baller R, Hage S, Fontaine P, Spinler S (2020) The assembly line feeding problem: An extended formulation with multiple line feeding policies and a case study. Internat. J. Production Econom. 222:107489.Google Scholar
• Battini D, Faccio M, Persona A, Sgarbossa F (2010) Framework to optimise the inventory centralisation/decentralisation degree and feeding policy in assembly systems. Internat. J. Services Oper. Management 6(2):184–205.Google Scholar
• Battini D, Gamberi M, Persona A, Sgarbossa F (2015) Part-feeding with supermarket in assembly systems: Transportation mode selection model and multi-scenario analysis. Assembly Automation 35(1):149–159.Google Scholar
• Bozer YA, McGinnis LF (1992) Kitting vs. line stocking: A conceptual framework and a descriptive model. Internat. J. Production Econom. 28(1):1–19.Google Scholar
• Caputo AC, Pelagagge PM (2011) A methodology for selecting assembly systems feeding policy. Indust. Management Data Systems 111(1):84–112.Google Scholar
• Cheng C, Yang P, Qi M, Rousseau L-M (2017) Modeling a green inventory routing problem with a heterogeneous fleet. Transportation Res. Part E Logist. Transportation Rev. 97:97–112.Google Scholar
• Emde S, Boysen N (2012) Optimally routing and scheduling tow trains for JIT-supply of mixed-model assembly lines. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 217:287–299.Google Scholar
• Limère V, Van Landeghem H, Goetschalckx M (2015) A decision model for kitting and line stocking with variable operator walking distances. Assembly Automation 35(1):47–56.Google Scholar
• Limère V, Van Landeghem H, Goetschalckx M, Aghezzaf EH, McGinnis LF (2012) Optimising part feeding in the automotive assembly industry: Deciding between kitting and line stocking. Internat. J. Production Res. 50(15):4046–4060.Google Scholar
• Moretti E, Tappia E, Limère V, Melacini M (2021) Exploring the application of machine learning to the assembly line feeding problem. Oper. Management Res. 14:403–419.Google Scholar
• Müllerklein D, Fontaine P, Ostermeier F (2022) Integrated consideration of assembly line scheduling and feeding: A new model and case study from the automotive industry. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 170:108288.Google Scholar
• Nourmohammadi A, Eskandari H, Fathi M, Ng AH (2021) Integrated locating in-house logistics areas and transport vehicles selection problem in assembly lines. Internat. J. Production Res. 59(2):598–616.Google Scholar
• Sali M, Sahin E (2016) Line feeding optimization for just in time assembly lines: An application to the automotive industry. Internat. J. Production Econom. 174:54–67.Google Scholar
• Sali M, Sahin E, Patchong A (2015) An empirical assessment of the performances of three line feeding modes used in the automotive sector: Line stocking vs. kitting vs. sequencing. Internat. J. Production Res. 53(5):1439–1459.Google Scholar
• Schmid NA, Limère V (2019) A classification of tactical assembly line feeding problems. Internat. J. Production Res. 57(24):7586–7609.Google Scholar
• Schmid NA, Limère V, Raa B (2021) Mixed model assembly line feeding with discrete location assignments and variable station space. Omega 102:102286.Google Scholar
• Swaminathan JM, Nitsch TR (2007) Managing product variety in automobile assembly: The importance of the sequencing point. Interfaces 37(4):324–333.Link, Google Scholar
• Zangaro F, Minner S, Battini D (2021) A supervised machine learning approach for the optimisation of the assembly line feeding mode selection. Internat. J. Production Res. 59(16):4881–4902.Google Scholar