Ship Scheduling for Taicang Port

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.2024.0161

References

  • Agra A, Rodrigues F (2022) Distributionally robust optimization for the berth allocation problem under uncertainty. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 164:1–24.Google Scholar
  • Bacalhau ET, Casacio L, de Azevedo AT (2021) New hybrid genetic algorithms to solve dynamic berth allocation problem. Expert Systems Appl. 167:114198.Google Scholar
  • Bouzekri H, Alpan G, Giard V (2023) Integrated laycan and berth allocation problem with ship stability and conveyor routing constraints in bulk ports. Comput. Indust. Engrg. 181:109341.Google Scholar
  • Cao Z, Wang W, Jiang Y, Xu X, Xu Y, Guo Z (2022) Joint berth allocation and ship loader scheduling under the rotary loading mode in coal export terminals. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 162:229–260.Google Scholar
  • Chargui K, Zouadi T, Sreedharan VR (2023) Berth and quay crane allocation and scheduling problem with renewable energy uncertainty: A robust exact decomposition. Comput. Oper. Res. 156:106251.Google Scholar
  • Chargui K, Zouadi T, El Fallahi A, Reghioui M, Aouam T (2021) Berth and quay crane allocation and scheduling with worker performance variability and yard truck deployment in container terminals. Transportation Res. E Logist. Transportation Rev. 154:102449.Google Scholar
  • Cheimanoff N, Féniès P, Kitri MN, Tchernev N (2023) Exact and metaheuristic approaches to solve the integrated production scheduling, berth allocation and storage yard allocation problem. Comput. Oper. Res. 153:106174.Google Scholar
  • Correcher JF, Perea F, Alvarez-Valdes R (2024) The berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem with crane travel and setup times. Comput. Oper. Res. 162:106468.Google Scholar
  • Ding Y, Jia S, Gu T, Li C-L (2016) SGICT builds an optimization-based system for daily berth planning. Interfaces 46(4):281−296.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Diz G, Scavarda LF, Rocha R, Hamacher S (2014) Decision support system for Petrobras ship scheduling. Interfaces 44(6):555–566.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dragović B, Zrnić N, Dragović A, Tzannatos E, Dulebenets MA (2024) A comprehensive bibliometric analysis and assessment of high-impact research on the berth allocation problem. Ocean Eng. 300:117163.Google Scholar
  • Gao Z, Ji M, Kong L (2024) Integrated optimization of multi-machine scheduling and berth allocation in automated ore terminals. Computers Indust. Eng. 192:110236.Google Scholar
  • Guo L, Zheng J, Liang J, Wang S (2023) Column generation for the multi-port berth allocation problem with port cooperation stability. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 171:3−28.Google Scholar
  • Guo L, Zheng J, Du J, Gao Z, Fagerholt K (2024) Integrated planning of berth allocation, quay crane assignment and yard assignment in multiple cooperative terminals. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 183:103456.Google Scholar
  • He J, Wang Y, Tan C, Yu H (2021) Modeling berth allocation and quay crane assignment considering qc driver cost and operating efficiency. Advanced Eng. Informatics 47:101252.Google Scholar
  • Jia S, Wu L, Meng Q (2020) Joint scheduling of vessel traffic and pilots in seaport waters. Transportation Sci. 54(6):1495−1515.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ji B, Tang M, Wu Z, Yu SS, Zhou S, Fang X (2022) Hybrid rolling-horizon optimization for berth allocation and quay crane assignment with unscheduled vessels. Adv. Eng. Inform. 54:101733.Google Scholar
  • Korekane S, Nishi T, Tierney K, Liu Z (2024) Neural network assisted branch and bound algorithm for dynamic berth allocation problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 319(2):531−542.Google Scholar
  • Li MW, Xu RZ, Yang ZY, Hong WC, An XG, Yeh YH (2024) Optimization approach of berth-quay crane-truck allocation by the tide, environment and uncertainty factors based on chaos quantum adaptive seagull optimization algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 152:111197.Google Scholar
  • Liu B, Li ZC, Sheng D, Wang Y (2021) Integrated planning of berth allocation and vessel sequencing in a seaport with one-way navigation channel. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 143:23−47.Google Scholar
  • Lv Y, Zou M, Li J, Liu J (2024) Dynamic berth allocation under uncertainties based on deep reinforcement learning towards resilient ports. Ocean Coastal Management 252:107113.Google Scholar
  • Mao A, Yu T, Ding Z, Fang S, Guo J, Sheng Q (2022) Optimal scheduling for seaport integrated energy system considering flexible berth allocation. Appl. Energy 308:118386.Google Scholar
  • Martin-Iradi B, Pacino D, Ropke S (2024) An adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for the multi-port continuous berth allocation problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 316(1):152–167.Google Scholar
  • Pérez-Cañedo B, Verdegay JL, Rosete A, Concepción-Morales ER (2022) A multi-objective berth allocation problem in fuzzy environment. Neurocomputing 500:341–350.Google Scholar
  • Soroushnia G, Alinaghian M, Malekahmadi A (2024) An accelerated benders decomposition algorithm for the integrated storage space assignment, berth allocation, and yard crane deployment problem. Comput. Indust. Eng. 110397.Google Scholar
  • Tan Z, Zhang Q, Deng W, Zhen L, Shao W (2023) A simulation-based optimization for deploying multiple kinds road rescue vehicles in urban road networks. Comput. Indust. Eng. 181:109333.Google Scholar
  • Tang S, Jin JG, Lu C (2022) Investigation of berth allocation problem in container ports considering the variety of disruption. Comput. Indust. Eng. 172:108564.Google Scholar
  • Varelas T, Archontaki S, Dimotikalis J, Turan O, Lazakis I, Varelas O (2013) Optimizing ship routing to maximize fleet revenue at Danaos. Interfaces 43(1):37–47.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Z, Hu H, Zhen L (2024) Berth and quay cranes allocation problem with on-shore power supply assignment in container terminals. Comput. Indust. Eng. 188:109910.Google Scholar
  • Wang C, Liu K, Zhang C, Miao L (2024) Distributionally robust chance-constrained optimization for the integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 182:102923.Google Scholar
  • Xiang X, Liu C (2021) An almost robust optimization model for integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem. Omega 104:102455.Google Scholar
  • Yang ZY, Cao X, Xu RZ, Hong WC, Sun SL (2024) Applications of chaotic quantum adaptive satin bower bird optimizer algorithm in berth-tugboat-quay crane allocation optimization. Expert Systems Appl. 237:121471.Google Scholar
  • Yu J, Tang G, Voβ S, Song X (2023) Berth allocation and quay crane assignment considering the adoption of different green technologies. Transportation Res. Part E: Logist. Transportation Rev. 176:103185.Google Scholar
  • Zhang Y, Liang C, Shi J, Lim G, Wu Y (2022) Optimal port microgrid scheduling incorporating onshore power supply and berth allocation under uncertainty. Appl. Energy 313:118856.Google Scholar
  • Zhen L, Lv W, Tan Z, Dong B (2021) Container transportation scheduling between port yards and the hinterland in Yunfeng. INFORMS J. Appl. Analytics 52(3):250−266.Google Scholar
  • Zhen L, Zhuge D, Wang S, Wang K (2022) Integrated Berth and Yard Space Allocation under Uncertainty. Transportation Res. Part B: Methodological 162:1−27.Google Scholar
  • Zhen L, Li H, Xiao L, Lin D, Wang S (2024) Mathematical programming-driven daily berth planning in Xiamen port. INFORMS J. Appl. Analytics 54(4):329−356.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zheng H, Fan X, Tang C (2024) Integrated optimization of berth allocation problem with berth shifting strategies and ballast water management for dry bulk ports. Ocean Eng. 309:118430.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.