Cooperative Multiobjective Decision Support for the Paper Industry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.29.5.5

References

  • Abdul-Razaq T. S., Potts C. N., Van Wassenhove L. N. A survey of algorithms for the single machine total weighted tardiness scheduling problem. Discrete Appl. Math. (1990) 26(3):235–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Akkiraju R., Keskinocak P., Murthy S., Wu F. An agent-based approach for multi-machine scheduling. (1998) 27–29Proc. 10th Annual Conf. Innovative Appl. Artificial IntelligenceMenlo Park, California:1013–1019JulyGoogle Scholar
  • Beck J. C., Fox M. S. Supply chain coordination via mediated constraint relaxation. (1994) 15Proc. First Canadian Workshop Distributed Artificial IntelligenceBanff, Alberta(MayGoogle Scholar
  • Beck K., DeKing N., Garcia D., Goldsmith P., Keaton D., Marshall C., McLaren J., Miller D., Page R., Routson J., Rowland J., Rudder G., Tsai K., Whittingham T.Pulp and Paper 1998 North American Fact Book(Miller Freeman Inc, San Fransico, California) Google Scholar
  • Bennett D. P. Multicriteria optimization. (1998) . http://www.ieor.berkeley.edu/~bennett/multicrit.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Biermann C.Essentials of Pulping and Papermaking (1993) (SanDiego Academic Press, San Diego, California) Google Scholar
  • Chen C. L. Bayesian nets and A-teams for power system fault diagnosis. (1992) (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) . PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  • Das I. Multi-objective optimization. (1998) . http://www.mcs.anl.gov/otc/Guide/OptWeb/multiobj/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • deSouza P. S. Asynchronous organizations for multi-algorithm problems. (1993) (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) . PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  • Du J., Leung J. Y. Minimizing total tardiness on one machine is NP-hard. Math. Oper. Res. (1990) 15(3):483–494LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dyckhoff H. A typology of cutting and packing problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1990) 44(2):145–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Erman L. D., Hayes-Roth F., Lesser V. R., Reddy R. D. The Hearsay-II speech-understanding system: Integrating knowledge to resolve uncertainty. ACM Comput. Surveys (1980) 12(2):213–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferreira J. S., Neves M. A., Castro P. F. A two-phase roll cutting problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1990) 44(2):185–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilmore P. C., Gomory R. E. A linear programming approach to the cutting stock problem. Oper. Res. (1961) 9(6):849–859LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilmore P. C., Gomory R. E. A linear programming approach to the cutting stock problem: Part II. Oper. Res. (1963) 11(6):863–888LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Golden B. L. Approaches to the cutting stock problem. AIIE Trans. (1976) 8(2):265–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodwin R. T., Rachlin J., Murthy S., Akkiraju R. Interactive decision support: Advantages of an incomplete utility model. (1998) Proc. AAA1 Spring Sympos. Interactive and Mixed Initiative Decision-Theoretic SystemsStanford, California:55–61March 1998Google Scholar
  • Goulimis C. Optimal solutions for the cutting stock problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1990) 44(2):197–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haessler R. W. A heuristic programming solution to a nonlinear cutting stock problem. Management Sci. (1971) 17(12):793–802LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haessler R. W. Selection and design of heuristic procedures for solving roll trim problems. Management Sci. (1988a) 34(12):1460–1471LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haessler R. W. A new generation of paper machine trim programs. Tappi J. (1988b) 71(8):127–130Google Scholar
  • Haessler R. W., Sweeney P. E. Cutting stock problems and solution procedures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1991) 54(2):141–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinxman A. I. The trim-loss and assortment problems: A survey. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1979) 5(1):8–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho J. C., Chang Y. Heuristics for minimizing mean tardiness for m parallel machines. Naval Res. Logist. (1991) 38(3):367–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman T. AI based software models help cut production costs. Computer World (1996) September 2):59–60 http://www.computerworld.com/home/print9497.nsf/all/SL35paperGoogle Scholar
  • Holland J. H.Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems (1975) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan) Google Scholar
  • Holsenback J. E., Russell R. M. A heuristic algorithm for sequencing on one machine to minimize total tardiness. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1992) 43(1):53–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huberman B., Lukose R., Hogg T. An economics approach to hard computational problems. Science (1997) 275(5296):51–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keskinocak P., Wu F., Goodwin R. T., Murthy S., Akkiraju R., Kumaran S., Derebail A. Scheduling solutions for the paper industry. (1998) . IBM research report RC21297 (94999)Google Scholar
  • Koulamas C. The total tardiness problem: Review and extensions. Oper. Res. (1994) 42(6):1025–1041LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H. S., Murthy S., Haider S. W., Morse D. Primary production scheduling at steel-making industries. IBM J. Res. Development (1996) 40(2):231–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee Y. H., Bhaskaran K., Pinedo M. A heuristic to minimize the total weighted tardiness with sequence dependent setups. IIE Trans. (1997) 29(1):45–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee Y. H., Pinedo M. Scheduling jobs on parallel machines with sequence dependent setup times. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 100(3):464–474CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu J. S., Sycara K. P. Multiagent coordination in tightly coupled task scheduling. (1996) Proc. 2nd Internat. Conf. Multiagent Systems (ICMAS '96)Kyoto, JapanDecemberGoogle Scholar
  • Martello S., Toth P.Knapsack Problems: Algorithms and Computer Implementations (1990) (John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom) Google Scholar
  • Murthy S. Synergy in cooperating agents: Designing manipulators from task specifications. (1992) (Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) . PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  • Numao M., Morishita S. Cooperative scheduling and its application to steel-making processes. IEEE Trans. Indust. Electronics (1991) 38(2):150–155CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Panwalkar S. S., Smith M. L., Koulamas C. P. A heuristic for the single machine tardiness problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1993) 70(3):304–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pickard G. C. Paper machine scheduling yields gains at James River Naheola Mill. Pulp and Paper (1997) 71(9):125–129Google Scholar
  • Pierce J. F.Some Large-Scale Production Scheduling Problems in the Paper Industry (1964) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey) Google Scholar
  • Reddy R. The challenge of artificial intelligence. IEEE Comput. (1996) 29(10):86–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salman F. S., Kalagnanam J., Murthy S. Cooperative strategies for solving the bicriteria sparse multiple knapsack problem. (1997) . IBM research report RC 21059 (94164)Google Scholar
  • Shaw M. Madison streamlines business processes with integrated information system. Pulp and Paper (1998) 72(5):73–81Google Scholar
  • Smith F. S., Ow P. S., Muscettola N., Potwin J., Matthys D. C. An integrated framework for generating and revising factory schedules. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1990) 41(6):539–552CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stadtler H. A one-dimensional cutting stock problem in the aluminum industry and its solution. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1990) 44:209–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steuer R. E.Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Applications (1989) (Robert E. Krieger Publishing, Malabar, Florida) Google Scholar
  • Swaminathan J. M., Smith S. F., Sadeh N. M. A multi-agent framework for modeling supply chain dynamics. (1996) Proc. NSF Res. Planning Workshop Artificial Intelligence and ManufacturingAlbuquerque, New MexicoJuneGoogle Scholar
  • Talukdar S. N., Pyo S. S., Mehrotra R. Distributed processors for numerically intense problems. (1983) . Final report for Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Project, RP 1983-1764-3Google Scholar
  • Talukdar S. N., deSouza P., Murthy S. Organizations for computer-based agents. Internat. J. Engrg. Intelligent Systems Electr. Engrg. Comm. (1993) 1(2):75–87Google Scholar
  • Tsen C. K. Solving train scheduling problems using A-teams. (1995) (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) . PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  • Vahrenkamp R. Random search in the one-dimensional cutting stock problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1992) 95:191–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner H. M.Principles of Operations Research, with Applications to Managerial Decisions (1969) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey) Google Scholar
  • Wascher G. An LP-based approach to cutting stock problems with multiple objectives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1990) 44:175–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yu P. L.Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (1985) (Plenum Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.