Internal OR Consulting: Effective Practice in a Changing Environment

References

  • Abdel-Malek L., Johnson F., Wolf C., Spencer T. Practice: Survey results and reflections of practising INFORMS members. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1999) 50(10):914–1003CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell P. Strategic operational research. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1998) 49(4):381–391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell P., Machol R. E., Fildes R., Ranyard J. C. Final discussion in The foundations, developments and current practice of OR—the Bowness Symposium. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1998) 49(4):434–443Google Scholar
  • Blackett P. M. S. Operational research. Operational Research Quarterly (1950) 1(1):3–6CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Botha S., Gryffenberg I., Hofmeyr F. R., Lausberg J. L., Nicolay R. P., Smit W. J., Uys S., Van der Merve W., Wessels G. J. Guns or butter: Decision support for determining the size and shape of the South African National Defence Force. Interfaces (1997) 01–0227(1):7–28LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bradbard D. A., Ford F. N., Cox J. F., Ledbetter W. N. The management science/operations research industrial-academic interface. Interfaces (1987) 03–0417(2):39–48LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Drucker P. J.Management: Tasks, Responsibilities and Priorities (1974) (Heinemann, London)Google Scholar
  • Eilon S. The role of management science. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1980) 31(1):17–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eilon S. To charge or not to charge. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1998) 49(4):396–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fildes R., Ranyard J. C. Success and survival of operational research groups—A review. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1997) 48(4):336–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fildes R., Ranyard J. C. The foundation, development and current practice of OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1998) 49(4):303–443Papers presented at a symposium held in Bowness, Cumbria, UK, 20–22 May 1996CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fildes R., Ranyard J. C. The management of OR groups—Results of a survey. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1999) 50(6):563–580CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forder R.OR in Defence (1996) (Cumbria, UK). paper presented to the Bowness SymposiumGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. M. Forces, trends and opportunities in MS/OR. Operations Research (1992) 40(3):423–445LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirby M. W., Capey R. The origins and diffusion of operational research in the UK. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1998) 49(4):327–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lindsey G. Four good decades of OR in the Canadian Department of National Defence. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1998) 49(4):327–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Machol R. E. How OR can survive and prosper. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1998) 49(4):392–395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miser H.Handbook of Systems Analysis: Volume Three—Cases (1995) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Miser H. Cautionary tales. ORS Newsletter (1997) 321):16–18Google Scholar
  • Mitchell G. H. Report of the Commission on the Future Practice of Operational Research. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1986) 37(9):833–886Google Scholar
  • Mitchell G. H., Tomlinson R.Six principles for effective OR—Their basis in practice (1979) OR '78(K. B. Haley, North-Holland, Amsterdam) 32–52Google Scholar
  • Ormerod R. Beyond internal OR groups. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1998) 49(4):426–429CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Overmeer W. J. A. M., Corbett C. J., Van Wassenhove L. N. Co-operation between strands of practice: Challenges and opportunities for the renewal of OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1998) 49(4):369–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Radnor M., Neal R. D. The progress of management science activities in large US corporations. Operations Research (1973) 21(2):427–450LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Radnor M., Rubenstein A. H., Bean A. S. Integration and utilization of management science activities in organizations. Operational Research Quarterly (1968) 19(2):117–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ranyard J. C., Fildes R. Winners and losers. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1998) 49(4):355–368CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ranyard J. C., Fildes R., Crymble W. R. Death of an OR group. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1997) 48(4):361–372CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenhead J. What's the problem? An introduction to problem structuring methods. Interfaces (1996) 11–1226(6):117–131LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tobin N., Rapley K.OR and IT—Gaining competitive advantage from OR British Airways (1996) (Cumbria, UK). paper presented to the Bowness SymposiumGoogle Scholar
  • Tomlinson R. The six principles for effective OR—Their relevance in the 90s. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1998) 49(4):403–407CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman H.-J. Some observations on practising successful operations research. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1998) 49(4):413–419CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.