Optimized Crew Scheduling at Air New Zealand

References

  • Albers S. Implicit enumeration algorithms for the set-partitioning problem. OR Spektrum (1980) 2(1):23–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allard D. (2000) . supporting letter dated March 9, 2000 provided as part of Franz Edelman 2000 finalist submissionGoogle Scholar
  • Anbil R., Forrest J., Pulleyblank W. Column generation and the airline crew pairing problem. Documenta Mathematica (1998) (Extra volume ICM, III)677–686Google Scholar
  • Anbil R., Gelman E., Patty B., Tanga R. Recent advances in crew-pairing optimization at American Airlines. Interfaces (1991) 21(1):62–74(January-February)LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Berge C. Balanced matrices. Mathematical Programming (1972) 2(1):19–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyd E. A. Resolving degeneracy in combinatorial linear programming: Steepest edge, steepest ascent and parametric ascent. Mathematical Programming (1995) 68(2):155–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke R. J. Crew rostering using assignment algorithms. (1989) (University of Auckland, New Zealand) . Masters thesis, Department of Engineering ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Day P. R. Flight attendant rostering for short-haul airline operations. (1996) (University of Auckland, New Zealand) . PhD thesis, Department of Engineering ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Day P. R., Ryan D. M. Flight attendant rostering for short-haul airline operations. Operations Research (1997) 45(5):649–661LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Deaker J. Construction of standby crew patterns for international flight attendants at Air New Zealand. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of ORSNZ (1994) (Operational Research Society of New Zealand)74–79Google Scholar
  • Desrosiers J., Dumas Y., Desrosiers M., Soumis F., Sanso B., Trudeau P. A breakthrough in airline crew scheduling. Cahiers du GERAD (1991) (Montreal, Canada) . Report G-91-11Google Scholar
  • Falkner J. C. Bus crew-scheduling and the set partitioning model. (1988) (University of Auckland, New Zealand) . PhD thesis, Department of Engineering ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Forrest J., Goldfarb D. Steepest-edge simplex algorithms for linear programming. Mathematical Programming (1992) 57(3):341–374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gamache M., Soumis F., Marquis G., Desrosiers J. A column generation approach for large scale aircrew rostering problems. Operations Research (1999) 47(2):247–263LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goldfarb D., Reid J. A practicable steepest-edge simplex algorithm. Mathematical Programming (1977) 12(3):361–371CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldie A. P. Optimal airline crew-scheduling using dynamic column generation. (1996) (University of Auckland, New Zealand) . Masters thesis, Department of Engineering ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Lavoie S., Minoux M., Odier E. A new approach for crew pairing problems by column generation with an application to air transportation. European Journal of Operational Research (1988) 35(1):45–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marsten R. E. An algorithm for large set partitioning problems. Management Science (1974) 20(5):774–787LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marsten R. E., Shepardson F. Exact solution of crew-scheduling problems using the set partitioning model: Recent successful applications. Networks (1981) 11:165–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Minoux M. Column generation techniques in combinatorial optimization—A new application to crew pairing. Proceedings of XXIV AGIFORS (1984) (Symposium, Strasbourg, France) 15–30Google Scholar
  • Mueller M. Air crew rostering for Air New Zealand. (1985) (University of Auckland, New Zealand) . Third professional project report, Department of Engineering ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Padberg M. Perfect zero-one matrices. Mathematical Programming (1974) 6(2):180–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rubin J. A technique for the solution of massive set covering problems, with application to airline crew-scheduling. Transportation Science (1973) 7(1):34–48LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan D. M. ZIP— A zero-one integer programming package for scheduling. (1980) (Harwell, Oxfordshire) . Computer Science and Systems Division Report 85, Atomic Energy Research EstablishmentGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan D. M. The solution of massive generalised set partitioning problems in aircrew rostering. Journal of the Operational Research Society (1992) 43(5):459–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan D. M., Falkner J. C. On the integer properties of scheduling set partitioning models. European Journal of Operational Research (1988) 35(3):442–456CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ryan D. M., Foster B. A., Wren A. An integer programming approach to scheduling. in Computer Scheduling of Public Transport (1981) (North-Holland, Amsterdam)269–280Google Scholar
  • Ryan D. M., Osborne M. R. On the solution of highly degenerate linear programmes. Mathematical Programming (1988) 41(3):385–392CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thornley M. O. Crew rostering under a seniority preferential bidding environment using column generation. (1995) (New Zealand). Masters thesis, Department of Engineering ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Waite J. R. F. Language assignment for flight attendant rostering. (1995) (University of Auckland, New Zealand) . Project report, Department of Engineering ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Wallace C. A. Construction of optimal tours-of-duty for long-haul flight attendants. (2000) (University of Auckland, New Zealand) . PhD thesis (in preparation), Department of Engineering ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Wedelin D. An algorithm for large scale 0-1 integer programming with application to airline crew-scheduling. Annals of Operations Research (1995) 57:283–301CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolfe P. A technique for resolving degeneracy in linear programming. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (1963) 11(2):205–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.