Next Generation Factory Layouts: Research Challenges and Recent Progress

References

• Afentakis P., Millen R. A., Salomon M. M. Dynamic layout strategies for flexible manufacturing systems. Internat. J. Production Res. (1990) 28(2):311–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Askin R. G. An empirical evaluation of holonic and fractal layouts. Internat. J. Production Res. (1999) 37(5):961–978Crossref, Google Scholar
• Askin R. G., Lundgren N. H., Ciarallo F., Graves R. J., McGinnis L. F., Medeiros D. J., Ward R. E., Wilhelm M. R. A material flow based evaluation of layout alternatives for agile manufacturing. Progress in Material Handling Research (1997) (Braun-Brumfield, Ann Arbor, MI) 71–90Google Scholar
• Flexible workstations cut work in processAssembly Magazine (1995) online edition(September issue). Retrieved June 2, 2002 〈 www.assemblymag.com〉Google Scholar
• Norstart custom telephones rely on flexible conveyor systemsAssembly Magazine (1996) online edition(May issue). Retrieved June 2, 2002 〈 www.assemblymag.com〉Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan J. The dynamics of plant layout. Management Sci (1993) 39(5):654–655Link, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan J., Cheng C. H. Dynamic layout algorithms: A state of the art survey. Omega (1998) 26(4):507–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan J., Jacobs F. R., Venkataramanan M. A. Solutions for the constrained dynamic facility layout problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1992) 57(2):280–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batta R. The dynamics of plant layout. Management Sci. (1987) 33(8):1065Link, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S., Kamrani A. K., Parasei H. R., Liles D. H. Machine sharing in cellular manufacturing systems. Planning, Design, and Analysis of Cellular Manufacturing Systems (1995) (Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S., Graves R., McGinnis L., Peters B. Flexible factory layouts. Progress in Material Handling Research (2000) (Material Handling Institute, Charlotte, NC) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S. Design of plant layouts with queueing effects. Management Sci. (2002) 48(5):679–704Link, Google Scholar
• Benjaafar S., Sheikhzadeh M. Design of flexible plant layouts. IIE Trans (2000) 32(4):309–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Braglia M., Zanoni S., Zavanella L. Layout design in dynamic environments: Strategies and quantitative indices. Internat. J. Production Res. (2002) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Bullington S. F., Webster D. B. Evaluating the flexibility of facilities layouts using estimated relayout costs. Proc. IXth Internat. Conf. Production Res. (1987) Birmingham, U.K.:2230–2236Google Scholar
• Conway D. G., Venkataramanan M. A. Genetic search and the dynamic facility layout problem. Comput. Oper. Res. (1994) 21(8):955–960Crossref, Google Scholar
• Drolet J. R. Scheduling virtual cellular manufacturing systems. (1989) . Ph.D. dissertation, School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, INGoogle Scholar
• Engardio P. Souping up the supply chain. Bus. Week (1998) August):24–31Google Scholar
• Feare T. Less automation means more productivity at Sun Microsystems. Modern Materials Handling (1997) November 1):22–25Google Scholar
• Feitzinger E., Lee H. Mass customization at Hewlett Packard: The power of postponement. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(1):116–121Google Scholar
• Flynn B. B., Jacobs F. R. A simulation comparison of group technology with traditional job shop manufacturing. Internat. J. Production Res. (1986) 24(5):1171–1192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fu M. C., Kaku B. K. Minimizing work-in-process and material handling in the facilities layout problem. IIE Trans. (1997) 29(1):29–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gibson P. The asset paradox. Electronic Bus. Magazine (2000) 26(4):120–126〈 www.eb-mag.com〉Google Scholar
• Gue K. The effect of trailer scheduling on the layout of freight terminals. Transportation Sci. (1999) 33(4):419–428Link, Google Scholar
• Gupta D., Benjaafar S. Make-to-order, make-to-stock, or delay product differentiation: A common framework for modeling and analysis. (2002) . Working paper, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
• Gupta R. M. Flexibility in layouts: A simulation approach. Material Flow (1986) 3(4):243–250Google Scholar
• Heragu S. S. Group technology and cellular manufacturing. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (1994) 24(2):203–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heragu S. S.Facilities Design (1997) (PWS Publishing, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Heragu S. S., Kochhar J. S. Material handling issues in adaptive manufacturing systems. The Materials Handling Engineering Division 75th Anniversary Commemorative Volume (1994) (ASME, New York) 9–13Google Scholar
• Heragu S. S., Zijm W. H. M. A framework for designing reconfigurable facilities. (2000) . Technical report, DSES Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NYGoogle Scholar
• Heragu S. S., Zijm W. H. M., van Ommeren J. C. W., Meng G. An open queuing network approach to evaluating cellular and jobshop layouts. (2000) . Technical report, DSES Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NYGoogle Scholar
• Hicks P. E., Cowan T. E. CRAFT-M for layout arrangement. Indust. Engrg. (1976) 8(5):30–35Google Scholar
• Ikegaya A. Highly productive and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. (2000) . Technical project report, Retrieved September Intelligent Manufacturing Systems Initiative.2001 〈 www.ims.org〉Google Scholar
• Irani S. A., Huang H. Custom design of facility layouts for multi-product facilities using layout modules. IEEE Trans. Robotics Automation (2000) 16:259–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Irani S. A., Cavalier T. M., Cohen P. H. Virtual manufacturing cells: Exploiting layout design and intercell flows for the machine sharing problem. Internat. J. Production Res. (1993) 31(4):791–810Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaku B. K., Mazzola J. B. A tabu-search heuristic for the dynamic plant layout problem. INFORMS J. Comput. (1997) 9(4):374–384Link, Google Scholar
• Klote J. F., Meller R. D. The design of a distribution center with value added operations. (2000) . Working paper, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, VAGoogle Scholar
• Kochhar J. S., Heragu S. S. Facility layout design in a changing environment. Internat. J. Production Res. (1999) 37(11):2429–2446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koren Y., Jovane F., Moriwaki T., Pristchow G., Ulsoy G., Brusel H. V. Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Ann. CIRP (1999) 48:527–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kouvelis P., Kiran A. S. Single and multiple period layout models for automated manufacturing systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1991) 52(3):300–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kouvelis P., Kurawarwala A. A., Gutierrez G. J. Algorithms for robust single period and multiple period layout planning for manufacturing systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1992) 63(2):287–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kusiak A., Heragu S. S. The facility layout problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1987) 29(3):229–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lacksonen T.A., Enscore E. E. Quadratic assignment algorithms for the dynamic layout problem. Internat. J. Production Res. (1993) 31(3):503–517Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahmar M., Benjaafar S. Design of dynamic distributed layouts. (2002) . Working paper, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
• Lee H. L., Tang C. S. Modeling the costs and benefits of delayed product differentiation. Management Sci. (1997) 43(1):40–53Link, Google Scholar
• McHale T. Special report-The top 100 contract manufacturers. Electronic Bus. Magazine (1999) August). Retrieved June 2, 2002 〈 www.eb-mag.com〉Google Scholar
• Meller R., Gau K. Y. The facility layout problem: Recent and emerging trends and perspectives. J. Manufacturing Systems (1996a) 15(5):351–366Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meller R., Gau K. Y. Facility layout objective functions and robust layouts. Internat. J. Production Res. (1996b) 34(10):2727–2742Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montreuil B. Fractal layout organization for job shop environments. Internat. J. Production Res. (1999) 37(3):501–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montreuil B., LaForge A. Dynamic layout design given a scenario tree of probable futures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1992) 63(2):271–286Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montreuil B., Venkatadri U. Strategic interpolative design of dynamic manufacturing systems layout. Management Sci. (1991) 37(6):682–694Link, Google Scholar
• Montreuil U. Venkatadri, Lefrançois P. Holographic layout of manufacturing systems. (1991) . Technical Report No. 91-76, Faculty of Management, Laval University, Montreal, Québec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• National Research CouncilVisionary Manufacturing Challenges for 2020 (1998) (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
• Norman B. A., Smith A. E. Considering production uncertainty in block layout design. (2001) . Working paper, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Palekar U. S., Batta R., Bosch R. M., Elhence S. Modeling uncertainties in plant layout problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1992) 63(2):347–359Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt M. J. The dynamics of plant layout. Management Sci. (1986) 32(1):76–86Link, Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt M. J., Kropp D. H. The single period stochastic plant layout problem. IIE Trans. (1992) 24(2):169–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt M. J., Lee H. L. A robustness approach to facilities design. Internat. J. Production Res. (1987) 25(4):479–486Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarper H., Greene T. J. Comparison of equivalent pure cellular and functional production environments using simulation. Internat. J. Comput. Integrated Manufacturing (1993) 6(4):221–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sethi A. K., Sethi S. P. Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey. Internat. J. Flexible Manufacturing Systems (1990) 2(4):289–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shafer S. M., Charnes J. M. Cellular versus functional layout under a variety of shop operating conditions. Decision Sci. (1993) 24(3):665–681Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shore R. H., Tompkins J. A. Flexible facilities design. AIIE Trans. (1980) 12(2):200–205Google Scholar
• Smith G., Wheatley J., Green J. Car power. Bus. Week-Internat. Ed. (2000) October 23):72–82Google Scholar
• Suresh N., Meredith J. Coping with the loss of pooling synergy in cellular manufacturing systems. Management Sci. (1994) 40(4):466–483Link, Google Scholar
• Tompkins J. A. Modularity and flexibility: Dealing with future shock in facilities design. Indust. Engrg. (1980) 22(9):78–81Google Scholar
• Tompkins J. A., White J. A., Bozer Y. A., Frazelle E. H., Tanchoco J. M. A., Trevino J.Facilities Planning (1996) 2nd ed.(John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Urban T. L. Computational performance and efficiency of lower bound procedures for the dynamic facility layout problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1992) 57(2):271–279Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban T. L. A heuristic for the dynamic layout problem. IIE Trans. (1993) 25(4):57–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban T. L. Solution procedures for the dynamic facility layout problem. Ann. Oper. Res. (1998) 76:323–342Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatadri U., Rardin R., Montreuil B. A design methodology for the fractal layout organization. IIE Trans. (1997) 29(10):911–924Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster D. B., Tyberghein M. B. Measuring flexibility of job shop layouts. Internat. J. Production Res. (1980) 18(1):21–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wemmerlöv U., Hyer L. N. Cellular manufacturing in the U.S. industry: A survey of users. Internat. J. Production Res. (1989) 27(9):1511–1530Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wemmerlöv U., Johnson D. J. Empirical findings on manufacturing cell design. Internat. J. Production Res. (2000) 38(3):481–507Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheatley J. Super factory—or super headache. Bus. Week (2000) July):31, 66Google Scholar
• Yang T., Peters B. A. Flexible machine layout design for dynamic and uncertain production environments. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1998) 108(1):49–64Crossref, Google Scholar