Combinatorial and Quantity-Discount Procurement Auctions Benefit Mars, Incorporated and Its Suppliers
Published Online:1 Feb 2003https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.33.1.23.12717
References
- Improving purchase productivity with a normative decision support system. Interfaces (1986) 15(3):106–115Link, Google Scholar
- A smart market for industrial procurement with capacity constraints. Submitted to Management Sci. (2002) Google Scholar
- Single period inventory models with demand uncertainty and quantity discounts: Behavioral implications and a new solution procedure. Naval Res. Logis. Quart. (1985) 32(4):537–550Crossref, Google Scholar
- Telephone companies analyze price quotations with BellCore's PDSS software. Interfaces (1994) 24(1):50–63Link, Google Scholar
- An incremental discount pricing with multiple customers and a single price break. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1988) 35(1):71–79Crossref, Google Scholar
- Column generation approach to the multiple knapsack problem with color constraints. (2001) . IBM Research Report RC 22013, Yorktown Heights, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- A generalized quantity discount pricing model to increase supplier's profit. Management Sci. (1986) 32(9):1177–1188Link, Google Scholar
- Knapsack Problems (1984) (Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization. John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
- Optimizing aggregate procurement decisions. J. Purchasing Materials Management (1986) 22(1):22–30Crossref, Google Scholar
- Auctions with endogenously determined allowable combinations. (2001) . RUTCOR research report RRR-3–2001, January. Rutgers Center for Operations Research, Rutgers University, NJGoogle Scholar
- Computationally manageable combinatorial auctions. Management Sci. (1998) 44:1131–1147Link, Google Scholar
- A procurement decision support system in business volume discount environments. Oper. Res. (1994) 42(1):14–23Link, Google Scholar
- Decision Systems for Inventory Management and Production Planning (1979) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
- Linear programming in bid evaluation. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1954) 1:48–54Crossref, Google Scholar

