Economics of an Information Intermediary with Aggregation Benefits

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0014

References

  • Bailey J. P., Bakos Y. An exploratory study of the emerging role of electronic role of electronic intermediary. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (1997) 1:7–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Khosla I., Sinha K. K. Quality and competition. Management Sci. (1998) 44(9):1179–1192LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bhargava H. K., Choudhary V. Information goods and vertical differentiation. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(2):85–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y., Iyer G., Padmanabhan V. Referral infomediaries. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(4):412–434LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chismar W. G., Meier J. A model of competing interorganizational systems and its application to airline reservation systems. Decision Support Systems (1992) 8(5):447–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons E. K., Kleindorfer P. R. An economic analysis of interorganizational information technology. Decision Support Systems (1992) 8(5):431–446CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C. J., Karmarkar U. S. Optimal pricing strategies for an information intermediary. (1999) . Working paper #99-001, UCLA Andersen Graduate School of ManagementGoogle Scholar
  • Currier K. M.Comparative Statics Analysis in Economics (2000) (World Scientific, River Edge, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dube L., Renaghan L. M. Marketing your hotel to and through intermediaries. Cornell Hotel Restaurant Admin. Quart. (2000) 41(1):73–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell J., Katz M. L. The effects of antitrust and intellectual property law on compatibility and innovation. Antitrust Bull. (1998) 43(3–4):609–650CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell J., Saloner G. Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) XL:9–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hoffman W., Keedy J., Roberts K. The unexpected return of B2B. McKinsey Quart. (2002) 3:97–105Google Scholar
  • Jing B. Market segmentation for information goods with network externality. (2002) . Discussion paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Jones R., Mendelson H. Product and price competition for information goods. (1998) . Discussion paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Kaplan S., Sawhney M. E-hubs: The new B2B marketplaces. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(3):97–103Google Scholar
  • Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75:424–440Google Scholar
  • Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(4):822–841CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Product introduction with network externalities. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 40(1):55–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman R. J., McAndrews J., Wang Y.-M. Opening the “black box” of network externalities in network adoption. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1):61–82LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Liebowitz S. J., Margolis S. E. Network externality: An uncommon externality. J. Econom. Perspectives (1994) 8:133–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer D. W. Essays on quality and product differentiation. (1996) . Ph.D. thesis, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  • Mussa M., Rosen S. Monopoly and product quality. J. Econom. Theory (1978) 18(2):301–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker G. G., Alstyne M. W. V. Information complements, substitutes, and strategic product design. (2000) . Social Sciences Research Network Working Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar
  • Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. Cooperation among competitors: Some economics of payment card associations. RAND J. Econom (2002) 33(4):549–570CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Saloner G., Shepard A. Adoption of technologies with network effects: An empirical examination of the adoption of automated teller machines. Rand J. Econom. (1995) 26(3):479–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarkar M. B., Butler B., Steinfield C. Intermediaries and cybermediaries: A continuing role for mediating players in the electronic marketplace. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. (1995) 1(3Google Scholar
  • Spulber D. F. Market making by price-setting firms. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1996) 63(217):559–580CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian H.Microeconomic Analysis (1992) 3rd ed.(Norton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wise R., Morrison D. Beyond the exchange: The future of B2B. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(6):86–96Google Scholar
  • Yoo B., Choudhary V., Mukhopadhyay T. A model of neutral B2B intermediaries. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(3):43–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.