An Empirical Analysis of Network Externalities in Peer-to-Peer Music-Sharing Networks

References

• Adar E., Huberman B. A. Free riding on Gnutella. First Monday: Peer-Reviewed J. Internet (2000) 5(10Google Scholar
• Asvanund A., Krishnan R., Smith M. D., Telang R. Intelligent club management in peer-to-peer networks. (2003) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Augereau A., Greenstein S., Rysman M. Coordination versus differentiation in a standards war: The adoption of 56K modems. (2003) . Working paper, Boston University, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Avery S. Hollywood takes aim at online film-swappers. Columbus Dispatch (2002) 1F(July 20)Google Scholar
• Ba S., Stallaert J., Whinston A. B. Optimal investment in knowledge within a firm using a market mechanism. Management Sci. (2001) 47(9):1203–1219Link, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee B., Chawathe S., Gopalakrishnan V., Keleher P., Silaghi B. Efficient peer-to-peer searches using result-caching. Proc. 2nd Internat. Workshop Peer-to-Peer Systems (2003) Berkeley, CACrossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Kemerer C. Network externalities in microcomputer software: An econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market. Management Sci. (1996) 42(12):1627–1647Link, Google Scholar
• Buchanan J. M. An economic theory of clubs. Economica (1965) 32(125):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler B. S. Membership size communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(4):346–365Link, Google Scholar
• Cole R., Dodis Y., Roughgarden T. Pricing network edges for heterogeneous selfish users. Proc. 35th Annual ACM Sympos. Theory Comput. (2003) 521–530Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conner K. R. Obtaining strategic advantage from being imitated: When can encouraging “clones” pay? Management Sci. (1995) 41(2):209–225Link, Google Scholar
• Constant D., Sproull L., Kiesler S. The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7:119–135Link, Google Scholar
• Dranove D., Gandal N. The DVD vs. DIVX standard war: Network effects and empirical evidence of preannouncements effects. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2003) 12:363–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Economides N., Himmelberg C., Brock G. Critical mass and network size with application to the U.S. fax market. Toward a Competitive Telecommunications Industry: Selected Papers from the 1994 Telecommunications Policy Research Conference (1995) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York) Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G., Gabel H. L. Competition, compatibility and standards: The economics of horses, penguins and lemmings. Product Standardization as a Tool of Competitive Strategy (1987) (North-Holland, New York) 1–22Google Scholar
• Fontana J. NextPage taking P2P content sharing offline. NetworkWorldFusion (2002) April 12 2004Google Scholar
• Forman C., Chen P.-Y. Network effects and switching costs in the market for routers and switches. (2003) . Working paper, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Gandal N. Hedonic price indexes for spreadsheets and an empirical test for network externalities. The RAND J. Econom. (1994) 25(1):160–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gandal N., Kende M., Rob R. The dynamics of technological adoption in hardware/software systems: The case of compact disc players. RAND J. Econom. (2000) 31:43–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Golle P., Leyton-Brown K., Mironov I. Incentive for sharing in peer-to-peer networks. Proc. 3rd ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2001) Tampa, FL:264–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goolsbee A., Klenow P. Evidence on learning and network externalities in the diffusion of home computers. J. Law Econom. (2003) 40(2):317–344Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gu B., Jarvenpaa S. Online discussion boards for technical support: The effect of token recognition on customer contributions. Salvatore T. March, Anne Massey, Janice I. DeGross, eds. Proc. 2003 Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2003) (December 14–17)Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
• Hibbard J. Peer pressure: Forget the music business. In the latest attempt to commercialize peer-to-peer technology startups want Akamai's market. Red Herring (2001) 103(September 1):62Google Scholar
• Katz M., Shapiro C. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(4):822–841Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M., Shaprio C. Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspectives (1994) 8(2):93–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman R. J., McAndrews J., Wang Y.-M. Opening the “black box” of network adoption. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1):61–82Link, Google Scholar
• Kirk P. Gnutella protocol development—An overview of 0.6. protocol specification. (2003) . (July 5 2003)Google Scholar
• Kiron D. Napster. Harvard Business School Case Number 9-801-219. (2001) . (March 29)Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Attewell P. Electronic mail and organizational knowledge. (1993) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Krishnan R., Smith M. D., Tang Z., Telang R. The virtual commons: Why free riding can be tolerated in file sharing networks. (2003) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Kung H. T., Wu C. Differentiated admission for peer-to-peer systems: Incentivizing peers to contribute their resources. (2003) . Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
• Lai K., Feldman M., Stoica I., Chuang J. Incentives for cooperation in peer-to-peer networks. (2003) . Working paper, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Lambert D. Zero-inflated Poisson regression with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics (1992) 34:1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Minar N., Hedlund M., Oram A. A network of peers: Peer-to-peer models through the history of the Internet. Peer-to-Peer: Harnessing the Power of Disruptive Technologies (2001) (O'Reilly Publishing, Cambridge, MA) 3–20Google Scholar
• Parameswaran M., Susarla A., Whinston A. B. P2P networking: An information sharing alternative. IEEE Comput. (2001) 34(7):31–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park S. Quantitative analysis of network externalities in competing technologies: The VCR case. (2003) . Working paper, State University of New York Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NYGoogle Scholar
• Saloner G., Shepard A. Adoption of technologies with network effects: An empirical examination of the adoption of automated teller machines. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26(Autumn):479–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saloner G., Spence A. M.Creating Value and Capturing Value: Perspectives and Cases on Electronic Commerce (2002) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Samuelson P. The pure theory of public goods. The Rev. Econom. Statist. (1954) 36(4):387–389Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schonfeld E. Peer-to-peer technology goes legit. Business 2.0 (2002) . (April 12 2004)Google Scholar
• Sripanidkulchai K., Maggs B., Zhang H. Enabling efficient content location and retrieval in peer-to-peer systems by exploiting locality in interests. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Communication Rev. (2002) 32(1):80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stoica I., Morris R., Karger D., Kaashoek M. F., Balakrishnan H. Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for Internet applications. Proc. ACM Special Interest Group Signal Comm. (2001) San Diego, CACrossref, Google Scholar
• Strahilevitz L. J. Charismatic code social norms, and the emergence of cooperation on the file-swapping networks. Virginia Law Rev. (2002) 89(May):505–596Google Scholar
• Subramani M. R., Peddibhotla N. Contributing to document repositories—An examination of prosocial behavior. (2002) . Working paper, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNGoogle Scholar
• Varian H. Economics of information technology. (2003) . Working paper, University of California at Berkeley, Berkley, CAGoogle Scholar
• Wackerly D., Mendenhall W., Scheaffer R.Mathematical Statistics with Applications (2001) 6th ed(Duxbury Press, Florence, KY) Google Scholar
• Warner M. The new Napsters. Fortune (2002) 146(3):110–112Google Scholar
• Wasko M. M., Faraj S. Is it what one does: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2000) 9(2–3):155–173Crossref, Google Scholar