Impact of Environmental Uncertainty and Task Characteristics on User Satisfaction with Data

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0022

References

  • Aguinis H., Beaty J. C., Boik R. J., Pierce C. A. Effect size and power in moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) . In pressGoogle Scholar
  • Aldrich H. E. Organizations and Environments (1979) (Englewood Cliffs NJ., Prentice-Hall)Google Scholar
  • Allen B. R., Boynton A. C. Information architecture: In search of efficient flexibility. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(4):435–445CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andres H. P., Zmud R. W. A contingency approach to software project coordination. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 18(3):41–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andreson P., Tushman M. L. Technological discontinuities and dominant design: A cyclical model of technological change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(4):604–633CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Au N., Ngai W. T., Cheng T. C. E. A critical review of end-user information systems satisfaction research and a new research framework. Omega (2002) 30:451–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey J. E., Pearson S. W. Development of a tool measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Sci. (1983) 29(3):530–544LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benanati J., Lederer A. L. Coping with rapid changes in IT. Comm. ACM (2001) 44(4):83–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bensaou M., Venkatraman N. Inter-organizational relationships and information technology: A conceptual synthesis and a research framework. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (1996) 5(2):84–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bucciarelli L. L. Designing Engineers (1994) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Castrogiovanni G. J. Organization task environments: Have they changed fundamentally over time? J. Management (2002) 28(2):129–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chenhall R. H., Morris D. The impact of structure, environment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting systems. The Accounting Rev. (1986) LX1(1):16–35Google Scholar
  • Chidambaram L., Jones B. The impact of communication medium and computer support on group perceptions and performance: A comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(4):465–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Marcoulides G. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998) (Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Frye T. A.PLS-Graph (1998) (Soft Modeling Inc.). Version 3.0Google Scholar
  • Cooper R. B., Zmud R. W. Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):1–17LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Courtney H., Kirklan J., Viguerie P. Strategy under uncertainty. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(6):67–79Google Scholar
  • Daft R. L. Organization Theory & Design (2001) 7th ed.(South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):554–571LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Macintosh N. B. A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work-units. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26(2):207–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Sormunen J., Parks D. Chief executive scanning, environment characteristics, and company performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9(2):123–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D'Aveni R. A. Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering (1994) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of information technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):982–1003LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. The DeLone and McLean model of information system success: A ten-year update. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19(4):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dess G. G., Beard D. W. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(March):52–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dess G. G., Rasheed M. A. Conceptualizing and measuring organizational environments: A critique and suggestions. J. Management (1991) 17(4):701–710CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dess G. G., Robinson R. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5:265–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doll W. R., Torkzadeh G. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(2):259–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Downey H. K., Hellriegel D., Slocum J. Environmental uncertainty: The construct and its application. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1975) 20:613–629CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falk R. F., Miller N. B.A Primer on Soft Modeling (1992) (The University of Akron Press, Akron, OH) Google Scholar
  • Fox C., Levitin A., Redman T. The notion of data and its quality dimensions. Inform. Processing Management (1994) 30(1):9–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fry L. W., Slocum J. W. Technology, structure, and workgroup effectiveness: A test of a contingency model. Acad. Management J. (1984) 27(2):221–246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J. R. Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces (1974) 4(3):23–36LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D., Straub D. W., Boudreau M. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. AIS (2000) 4(1):1–77Google Scholar
  • Gerloff E. A., Muir N. K., Bodensteiner W. D. Three components of perceived environmental uncertainty: An exploratory analysis of the effects of aggregation. J. Management (1991) 17(4):749–768CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. Supporting Users of Corporate Data: The Effect of I/S Policy Choices (1988a) . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. IS attitudes: Toward theoretical and definition clarity. DATABASE (1988b) 19(3/4):6–15Google Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Sci. (1995) 41(12):1827–1844LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. Development and measurement validity of a task-technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information systems. Decision Sci. (1998) 29(1):105–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L., Thompson R. L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):213–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon L. A., Narayanan V. K. Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation. Accounting, Organ. Soc. (1984) 9(1):33–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gray P., Watson H.Decision Support in the Data Warehouse (1997) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hall R. H. Organizations: Structures Processes, and Outcomes (1999) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Huber G. P. The nature and design of post-industrial organizations. Management Sci. (1984) 30(8):928–951LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P., McDaniel R. R. The decision making paradigm of organizational design. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):572–588LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Inmon W. H. Building the Data Warehouse (1996) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Ives B., Olson M. H., Baroudi J. J. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Comm. ACM (1983) 26(10):785–793CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jauch L. R., Kraft K. L. Strategic management of uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11(4):777–790CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang J. J., Klein G., Carr C. Measuring information system service quality: SERVQUAL from the other side. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(2):145–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Judge W., Miller A. Antecedents and outcomes of decision speed in different environmental contexts. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(2):440–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larsen K. T. A taxonomy of antecedents of information system success: Variable analysis studies. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 20(2):169–246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lederer A. L., Mendelow A. L. The impact of the environment on the management of information systems. Inform. Systems Res. (1990) 1(2):205–222LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maier J. L., Rainer K., Snyder A. Environmental scanning for information technology. J. Management Inform. Systems (1997) 14(2):177–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Martin J. Strategic Data-Planning Methodologies (1982) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Melone N. P. A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Management Sci. (1990) 36(1):76–91LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller C. C., Glick W. H., Wang Y.-.D, Huber G. P. Understanding technology-structure relationships: Theory development and meta-analytic theory testing. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34(2):370–399CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D., Friesen P. H. Strategic making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management J. (1983) 4:221–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milliken F. J. Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State effect, and response uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12:133–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mintzberg H. The Structuring of Organizations (1979) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Nadler D., Tushman M.Strategic Organization Design: Concepts, Tools, and Processes (1988) (Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL) Google Scholar
  • Nunamaker J. F., Dennis A. R., Valacich J. S., Vogel D. R., George J. F. Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Comm. ACM (1991) 34(7):40–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J., Barley S. R. Technology and institutions: What can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2):145–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pitt L. F., Watson R. T., Kavan C. B. Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):173–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Priem R. L., Love L. G., Shaffer M. A. Executive perceptions of uncertainty sources: A numerical taxonomy and underlying dimensions. J. Management (2002) 28(6):725–746CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Randolph W. A., Dess G. G. The congruence perspective of organization design: A conceptual model and multivariate research approach. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9:114–127CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E. M. Diffusion of Innovations (1983) 3rd ed.(The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. W. Business strategy in hypercompetitive environment: Rethinking the logic of IT differentiation. Framing the Domains of IT Management Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past (2000) (Pinnaflex Press, Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
  • Sammon D., Finnegan P. The ten commandments of data warehousing. Database Adv. Inform. Systems (2000) 31(4):82–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanders G. L., Courtney J. F. A field study of organizational factors influencing DSS success. MIS Quart. (1985) 9(1):77–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sapienza H. J., Smith K. G., Gannon M. J. Using subjective evaluations of organizational performance in small business research. Amer. J. Small Bus. (1988) Winter):45–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoemaker P. J. H. Strategic decisions in organizations: Rational and behavioral views. J. Management Stud. (1993) 30(1):107–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schwab R. C., Ungson G. R., Brown W. R. Redefining the boundary spanning-environment relationship. J. Management (1985) 11(1):75–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharfman M. P., Dean J. W. Conceptualizing and measuring the organizational environment: A multidimensional approach. J. Management (1991) 17(4):681–700CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strong D. M., Lee Y. W., Wang R. Y. Data quality in context. Comm. ACM (1997) 40(5):103–110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S., Todd P. A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(2):144–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D. Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Tosi H., Aldag R., Storey R. On the measurement of the environment: An assessment of the Lawrence and Lorsch environmental subscale. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1973) 18:27–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tung R. Dimensions of organizational environments: An exploratory study of their impact on organizational structure. Acad. Management J. (1979) 22:672–693CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M. L., Nadler D. A. Information processing as an integrating concept on organization design. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3(3):613–624Google Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H., Delbecq A. A task contingent model of work unit structure. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1974) 19(2):183–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H., Ferry D. L.Measuring and Assessing Organizations (1980) (Wiley, Inter-science, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wang R. Y., Strong D. M. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. J. Management Inform. System (1996) 12(4):5–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson J., Fenner J. A complicated relationship. Inform. Week (2000) 24–32(May 29)Google Scholar
  • Wilder C. E-Transformation business models: The fast track to becoming an e-business. Inform. Week (1999) 42–60(December 13)Google Scholar
  • Yaverbaum G. J. Critical factors in the user environment: An experimental study of users organizations and tasks. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(1):75–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zigurs I., Buckland B. K. A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(3):313–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zmud R. W. An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the concept of information. Decision Sci. (1978) 9(2):187–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zviran M., Erlich Z. Measuring IS user satisfaction: Review and implications. Comm. AIS (2003) 12:81–103Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.