Information Overload and the Message Dynamics of Online Interaction Spaces: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Exploration

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0023

References

  • Ackerman M., Palen L. The Zephyr help instance: Promoting ongoing activity in a CSCW system. (1996) Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors Comput. SystemsCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adamic L. A. The small world web. (1999) Proc. 3rd Eur. Conf. Digital Libraries:443–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adamic L. A., Adar E. Friends and neighbors on the Web. (2000) . PARC Xerox Manuscript 1501. Palo Alto, CA, http://www.parc.xerox.com/istl/groups/iea/papers/web10/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Adar E., Huberman B. Free riding on Gnutella. First Monday (2000) 10(5Google Scholar
  • Barnett G. A., Chon B., Park H. W., Rosen D. Network analysis of international Internet flows. Internat. Sunbelt Soc. Network Conf. (2001) . Budapest, HungaryGoogle Scholar
  • Bevan N., Macleod M., Kelly M. Usability assessment and measurement. The Management and Measurement of Software Quality (1994) (Ashgate Technical/Gower Press)Google Scholar
  • Bradner E., Kelloggand W., Erickson T. The adoption and use of babble: A field study of chat in the workplace. Proc. ECSCW (1999) (Copenhagen, Denmark) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broadbent D. Perception and Communication (1958) (Pergamon Press, London U.K) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butler B. Membership size communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 13(4LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chambers J. M W. S. Cleveland, Kleiner B., Tukey P. A.Graphic Methods for Data Analysis (1983) (Wadsworth International Group, Duxbury Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cherny L. Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. Center for the Study of Language and Information. (1999) . StanfordGoogle Scholar
  • Ekeblad E. The emergence and decay of multilogue: Self regulation of a scholarly mailing list. Proc. Eur. Assoc. Res. Learning Instruction (1999) SwedenGoogle Scholar
  • Fletcher R. J. The Limits of Settlement Growth: A Theoretical Outline (1995) (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  • Forrester J. W. Urban Dynamics (1969) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fulk J., Schmitzand J. A., Schwarz D., Lea M. The dynamics of context-behavior interactions in computer-mediated communication. Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication (1992) (Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York) 7–29Google Scholar
  • Hagel J., Armstrong A.Net Gain: Expanding Markets Through Virtual Communities (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Herring S. Interactional coherence in CMC. Proc. 32nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (1999) HawaiiCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hiltz S. R., Turoff M.The Network Nation: Human Communication via Computer (1978) (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Hiltz S. R., Turoff M. Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload. Comm. ACM (1985) 28(7CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones S. Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community. Understanding Community in the Information Age (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 10–35Google Scholar
  • Jones Q. Virtual-communities, virtual-settlements and cyber-archaeology: A theoretical outline. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. (1997) 3(3CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones Q. The boundaries of virtual communities (2002) . Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Haifa IsraelGoogle Scholar
  • Jones Q. Appling Cyber-Archaeology, ECSCW 2003 (2003) (Kluwer Academic Publishers). In PressGoogle Scholar
  • Jones Q., Rafaeli S. Time to split, virtually: “Discourse architecture” and “community building” as means to creating vibrant virtual publics. Electronic Markets: The Internat. J. Electronic Commerce Bus. Media (2000a) 10(4):214–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones Q., Rafaeli S. What do virtual 'tells' tell? Placing cybersociety research into a hierarchy of social explanation. Proc. 33rd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2002) . IEEE PressGoogle Scholar
  • Kling R., Gerson E. The social dynamics of technological innovation in the computing world. Symbolic Interaction (1977) 1(11):132–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakatos L. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers (1978) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lea M., Spears R. Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision making. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. (1991) 34:283–301CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis D. D., Knowles K. A. Threading electronic mail: A preliminary study. Inform. Processing Management (1997) 33(2):209–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Licklider J., Taylor R. The computer as a communication device. Sci. Tech. (1968) Google Scholar
  • Liu G. Z. Virtual community presence in Internet relay chatting. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. (1999) 5(1CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L. Towards a “critical mass” theory of interactive media: Universal access interdependence and diffusion. Comm. Res. (1987) 14:491–511CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller G. A. The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity to process information. Psych. Rev. (1956) 63:81–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newell D., Simpson J. Regression to the mean. The Medical J. Australia (1990) 153(August 6):166–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palme J. The optimal group size in computer mediated communication. Electronic Mail (1995) (Artech House Publishers, London, U.K) Google Scholar
  • Park H. W., Thelwall M. Hyperlink analyses of the World Wide Web: A review. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. (2003) 8(4CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rafaeli S. Interactivity: From new media to communication. Sage Annual Review of Communication Research: Advancing Communication Science (1988) 16(CA):110–134Google Scholar
  • Rafaeli S., LaRose R. J. Electronic bulletin boards and ‘public goods’ explanations of collaborative mass media. Comm. Res. (1993) 20(2):277–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rafaeli S., Ravid G. Information sharing as enabler for the virtual team: An experimental approach to assessing the role of electronic mail in disintermediation. Inform. Systems J. (2003) 13:191–206CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rafaeli S., Ravid G., Soroka V. De-lurking in virtual communities: A social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital. Proc. 37th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2004) (Big Island, Hawaii)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rheingold H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier (1993) (Addison-Wesley, Reading MA) Google Scholar
  • Rogers E. M., Agarwala-Rogers R., Hanneman G. L., McEwen W. J. Organizational communication. Communication Behaviour (1975) (Addision Wesley, Reading, MA) 218–236Google Scholar
  • Schmitz J., Fulk J. Organizational colleagues, media richness, and electronic mail: A test of the social influence model. Comm. Res. (1991) 18:487–523CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoberth T., Preece J., Heinzl A. Online communities longitudinal analysis of communication activities. Proc. 36th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2003) (Big Island, Hawaii)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simpson R., Renear A., Mylonas E., van Dam A. 50 years after “as we may think”: The Brown/MIT Vannevar Bush Symposium. Interactions (1996) 3(2CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M, Smith M., Kollack P. Invisible crowds in cyberspace: Mapping the social structure of the Usenet. Communities in Cyberspace (1999) (Routledge, London, U.K.) 195–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M., Fiore A. Visualization components for persistent conversations. Proc. ACM's Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (2001) (Seattle, WA)136–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spears R., Lea M., Lea M. Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication. Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication (1992) (Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York) 30–65Google Scholar
  • Sproull L., Faraj S., Kiesler S. Atheism, sex and databases: The Net as a social technology. Culture of the Internet (1997) (Lawrence-Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Sproull L. S., Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. (1986) 32(11):1492–1512LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thorn B. K., Connolly T. Discretionary databases: A theory and some experimental findings. Comm. Res. (1987) 14(5):512–528CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wellman B., Gulia M., Kollock P., Smith M. Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don't ride alone. Communities in Cyberspace (1999) (Routledge, New York) Google Scholar
  • Whittaker S. Talking to strangers: An evaluation of the factors affecting electronic collaboration. Proc. CSCW '96 (1996) Cambridge MA:409–418CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whittaker S., Terveen L., Hill W., Cherny L. The dynamics of mass interaction. Proc. ACM's Conf. Comput. Supported Cooperative Work (1998) (Seattle, WA)257–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.