DSS Effectiveness in Marketing Resource Allocation Decisions: Reality vs. Perception

References

• Accenture Research Report. (2001) . Insight Driven Marketing, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
• Agarwal R., Tanniru M. R., Dacruz M. R. Knowledge-based support for combining qualitative and quantitative judgments in resource allocation decisions. J. Management Inform. Systems (1992) 9(Summer):165–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alavi M. Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(2):159–175Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arnott D. Decision biases and decision support systems development. (2002) . Working paper Decision Support Systems Laboratory, Monash University, Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
• Balzer W. K., Doherty M. E., O'Connor R. Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psych. Bull. (1989) 106(3):410–433Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman M.Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (1998) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Benbasat I., Nault B. R. An evaluation of empirical research in managerial support systems. Decision Support Systems (1990) 6(3):203–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blattberg R. C., Hoch S. J. Database models and managerial intuition: 50% model + 50% manager. Management Sci. (1990) 36(8):887–899Link, Google Scholar
• Chakravarti D., Mitchell A., Staelin R. Judgment-based marketing decision models: An experimental investigation of the decision calculus approach. Management Sci. (1979) 25(3):251–263Link, Google Scholar
• Churchill G. A. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16(1):64–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad. Medicine (2003) 78(8):775–780Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dawes R. M. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Amer. Psychologist (1979) 34(7):571–582Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLone W., McLean E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95Link, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Wixom B., Vandenberg R. J. Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2):167–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenstein Eric M., Lodish Leonard P.Precisely Worthwhile or Vaguely Worthless: Are Marketing Decision Support and Intelligent Systems “Worth It”? (2002) 436–456Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
• Fudge W. K., Lodish L. M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a model-based salesman's planning by field experimentation. Interfaces (1977) 8(1):97–106Link, Google Scholar
• Gensch D., Aversa N., Moore S. P. A choice modeling market information system that enabled ABB Electric to expand its market share. Interfaces (1990) 20(1):6–25Link, Google Scholar
• Goodman J. S. The interactive effects of task and external feedback on practice performance and learning. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1998) 76(3):223–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoch S. J.Experts and models in combination. R. C. Blattberg R. Glazer, J. D. C. Little, eds. The Marketing Information Revolution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
• Hoch S. J., Schkade D. A. A psychological approach to decision support systems. Management Sci. (1996) 42(1):51–64Link, Google Scholar
• Hogarth R. M., Makridakis S. Forecasting and planning: An evaluation. Management Sci. (1981) 27(2):115–138Link, Google Scholar
• Jöreskög K., Sörbom D.LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language (1993) (SSI Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Lilien G. L., Rangaswamy A.Marketing Engineering: Computer-Assisted Marketing Analysis and Planning (1998) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Lodish L. M., Curtis E., Ness M., Simpson M. K. Sales force sizing and deployment using a decision calculus model at Syntex Laboratories. Interfaces (1988) 18(1):5–20Link, Google Scholar
• McIntyre S. H. An experimental study of the impact of judgment-based marketing models. Management Sci. (1982) 28(1):17–33Link, Google Scholar
• Miranda S. M., Saunders C. Group support systems: An organization development intervention to combat groupthink. Public Admin. Quart. (1995) 19(2):193–216Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore J. H., Chang M. G., Bennet J. L. Meta-design considerations in building DSS. Building Decision Support Systems (1993) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) 173–204Google Scholar
• Mowen J. C., Gaeth G. J. The evaluation stage in marketing decision making. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1992) 20(2):177–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muckstadt J. A., Murray D. H., Rappold J. A., Collins D. E. Guidelines for collaborative supply chain system design and operation. Inform. Systems Frontiers (2001) 3(4):427–453Crossref, Google Scholar
• Payne J. W., Bettman J. R., Johnson E. J.The Adaptive Decision Maker (1993) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.The Diffusion of Innovations (2003) 5th ed.(The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Sharda R., Barr S. H., McDonnell J. C. Decision support system effectiveness: A review and an empirical test. Management Sci. (1988) 34(2):139–159Link, Google Scholar
• Silver M. S. Decision support systems: Directed and nondirected change. Inform. Systems Res. (1990) 1(1):47–70Link, Google Scholar
• Simon H. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quart. J. Econom. (1955) 69:99–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinha P., Zoltners A. A. Salesforce decision models: Insights from 25 years of implementation. Interfaces (2001) 31(3):S8–Link, Google Scholar
• Slovic P., Lichtenstein S. Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1971) 6(6):694–744Google Scholar
• Todd P., Benbasat I. Evaluating the impact of DSS, cognitive effort, and incentives on strategy selection. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(4):356–374Link, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185:1124–1131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Bruggen G. H., Smidts A., Wierenga B. The impact of the quality of a marketing decision support system: An experimental study. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1996) 13(4):331–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Bruggen G. H., Smidts A., Wierenga B. Improving decision making by means of a marketing decision support system. Management Sci. (1998) 44(5):645–658Link, Google Scholar
• Wierenga B., Van Bruggen G.Marketing Management Support Systems: Principles, Tools, and Implementation (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wigton R. S., Patti K. D., Hoellerich V. L. The effect of feedback in learning clinical diagnosis. J. Medical Ed. (1986) 61(October):816–822Google Scholar