An Economic Model of Product Quality and IT Value

References

• Anderson M., Banker R., Ravindran S. The new productivity paradox. Association Comput. Machinery, Comm. ACM (2003) 46(3):91–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baily M. What has happened to productivity growth? Science (1986) 234:443–451Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R., Kauffman R. Case study of electronic banking at Meridian Bancorp. Inform. Software Tech. (1991) 33(3):200–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bannan K. Plastics firm learns CRM makes it more flexible. B to B (2003) 88(10):13Google Scholar
• Barua A., Lee B. The information technology productivity paradox revisited: A theoretical and empirical investigation in the manufacturing sector. Internat. J. Flexible Manufacturing Systems (1997) 9(2):145–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A., Kriebel C., Mukhopadhyay T. An economic analysis of strategic information technology investments. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(3):312–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):169–195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Association Comput. Machinery Comm. ACM (1993) 36(12):67–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E. Technology's true payoff. InformationWeek (1994) October 10):34–36Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E. The contribution of information technology to consumer welfare. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(3):281–300Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. (1996) 42(4):541–558Link, Google Scholar
• Cremer H., Thisee J.-F. Commodity taxation in a differentiated oligopoly. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1994) 35(3):613–633Crossref, Google Scholar
• David J., Grabski S., Kasavana M. The productivity paradox of hotel-industry technology. Cornell Hotel Restaurant Administration Quart.37(2):64–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dedrick J., Gurbaxani V., Kraemer K. Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Surveys (2003) 35(1):1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devaraj S., Kohli R. Information technology payoff in the health-care industry: A longitudinal study. J. Management Inform. Systems (2000) 16(4):41–68Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dos Santos B., Peffers K., Mauer D. The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Inform. Systems Res. (1993) 4(1):1–23Link, Google Scholar
• Gal-Or E. Strategic and non-strategic differentiation. Canadian J. Econom. (1987) 20(2):340–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garvin D. What does “product quality” really mean? Sloan Management Rev. (1984) 26(1):25–43Google Scholar
• Grant P. Telecommunications (a special report); You have broadband; now what? There's plenty of free content available; and if you want to pay, there's even better stuff. Wall Street J. (2003) October 13):R8Google Scholar
• Green J. A rehab for Microsoft's Office. BusinessWeek (2003) 31(2):106–108Google Scholar
• Hackett G. Investments in technology—The service sector sinkhole? Sloan Management Rev. (1990) 31(2):97–103Google Scholar
• Higgins K. If you rebuild it, they will come. Network Comput. (2003) 14(16):67Google Scholar
• Hitt L., Brynjolfsson E. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):121–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jorgenson D., Stiroh K. Computers and growth. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (1995) 3:295–316Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klassen K., Russell R., Chrisman J. Efficiency and productivity measures for high contact services. Services Indust. J. (1998) 18(4):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambertini L. Choosing roles in a duopoly for endogenously differentiated products. Australian Econom. Papers (1996) 35(67):205–224Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lambertini L., Orsini R. Vertically differentiated model with a positional good. Australian Econom. Papers (2002) 41(2):151–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landers P. Drug industry's big push into technology falls short. Wall Street J. (2004) February 24):A1Google Scholar
• Lee B., Barua A. An integrated assessment of productivity and efficiency impacts of information technology investments: Old data, new analysis and evidence. J. Productivity Anal. (1999) 12(1):21–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehr B., Lichtenberg F. Information technology and its impact on productivity: Firm-level evidence from government and private data sources, 1977–1993. Canadian J. Econom. (1999) 32(2):335–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lehr W., Lichtenberg F. Computer use and productivity growth in U.S. federal government agencies, 1987–92. J. Indust. Econom. (1998) 46(2):257–279Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg F. The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: A firm level analysis. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (1995) 3(4):201–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lilien G., Kotler P., Moorthy K.Marketing Models (1992) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Loveman G. Cash drain no gain. Computerworld (1991) 25(47):69–71Google Scholar
• Lyon D. Making it good at Buick: A talk with designer David Lyon. Automotive Design Production (2001) 133(12):36–38Google Scholar
• Mandel M. Financial services: The silent engine. BusinessWeek (Indust./Tech. Edition) (1998) 3609:76Google Scholar
• Marsden J., Pingry D. Theory of decision supports systems portfolio evaluation. Decision Support Systems (1993) 9:183–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCrune J. The productivity paradox. Management Rev. (1998) 87(3):38–40Google Scholar
• McGee M., Wilder C. It's official: IT adds up. InformationWeek (2000) 782:42–51Google Scholar
• Metcalfe B. Economists and the productivity paradox. InfoWorld (1992) 14(46):72Google Scholar
• Metheny B. Relying solely on productivity to measure the impact of info. J. Systems Management (1994) 45(3):24Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. Product and price competition in a duopoly model. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7:141–168Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy K., Png I. Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):345–359Link, Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay T., Rajiv S., Srinivasan K. Information technology impact on process output and quality. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1645–1659Link, Google Scholar
• Panko R. Is office productivity stagnant? MIS Quart. (1991) 15(2):191–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Port O. Design tools move into the fast lane: New software turns ideas into reality in record time. BusinessWeek (2003) June 2):84BGoogle Scholar
• Quan J., Hu Q., Hart P. IT investments and firms' performance—A duopoly perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 20(3):121–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A. Technology investment and business performance. Association Comput. Machinery, Comm. ACM (1997) 40(7):89–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rai A., Patnayakuni R., Patnayakuni N. Refocusing where and how IT value is realized: An empirical investigation. Omega (1996) 24(4):399–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach S. Services under siege—The restructuring imperative. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1991) 69(5):82–91Google Scholar
• Schmitt P. The impact of a marginal cost increase on price and quality: Theory and evidence from airline market strikes. Australian Econom. Papers (2002) 41(3):282–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin N. The impact of information technology on financial performance: The importance of strategic choice. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2001) 10(4):227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spence A. Monoploy, quality and regulation. Bell J. Econom. (1975) 6(2):417–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strassmann P. The Business Value of Computers (1990) (Information Economics Press, New Canaan, CT) Google Scholar
• Strassmann P. The Squandered Computer (1997) (Information Economics Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Strassmann P. Fighting McKinsey. ComputerWorld (2001) 35(49):27Google Scholar
• Thatcher M., Oliver J. The impact of information technology on quality improvement, productivity, and profits: An analytical model of a monopolist. Proc. 34th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2001a) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatcher M., Oliver J. The impact of technology investments on a firm's production efficiency, product quality, and productivity. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001b) 18(2):17–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thatcher M., Pingry D. Understanding the business value of information technology investments: Theoretical evidence from alternative market and cost structures. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(2):61–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vasilash G. Designing with digits. Automotive Manufacturing Production (2001) 113(4):50–51Google Scholar
• Waurzyniak P. Automotive manufacturing's technology evolution. Manufacturing Engrg. (1999) 123(2):54–60Google Scholar
• Weill P. Do Computers Pay Off? (1990) (ICIT Press, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
• Whitford M. Driving demand. Hotel Motel Management (2000) 215(5):48–49Google Scholar