Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0032

References

  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1991) 50:179–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alge B. J. Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. J. App. Psych. (2001) 86(4):797–804CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103(3):411–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andrews S.Privacy and human rights 2002: An international survey of privacy laws and developments (2002) . http://www.privacyinternational.org/survey/phr2002/Google Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. P., Heatherton T. F. A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Model (1994) 1(1):35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1988) 16(1):74–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bearden W. O., Netemeyer R. G., Mobley M. F.Handbook of Marketing Scales: Multi-item Measures for Marketing and Consumer Behavior Research (1993) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Bies R. J., Moag J. S., Bazerman M., Lewicki R., Sheppard B. Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiations in Organizations (1986) Vol. 1(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 43–55Google Scholar
  • Bozdogan H. Model selection and Akaike's information criterion (AIC): The general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika (1987) 52(3):345–370CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell A. J. Relationship marketing in consumer markets: A comparison of managerial and consumer attitudes about information privacy. J. Direct Marketing (1997) 11(3):44–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D. T. Recommendations for APA test standards regarding construct, trait, or discriminant validity. Amer. Psych. (1960) 15(August):546–553CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D. T., Fiske D. W. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait–multi-method matrix. Psych. Bull. (1959) 56(2(March)):81–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caudill E. M., Murphy P. E. Consumer online privacy: Legal and ethical issues. J. Public Policy Marketing (2000) 19(1):7–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cespedes F. V., Smith H. J. Database marketing: New rules for policy and practice. Sloan Management Rev. (1993) 34(4):7–22Google Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Marcoulides G. A. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 295–336Google Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Gopal A., Salisbury W. D. Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(4):342–367LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen R. L. Distributive justice: Theory and research. Soc. Justice Res. (1987) 1:19–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cronbach L. J.Essentials of Psychological Testing (1990) (Harper-Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Culnan M. J. Consumer awareness of name removal procedures: Implications for direct marketing. J. Direct Marketing (1995) 9(2):10–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culnan M. J. Protecting privacy online: Is self-regulation working? J. Public Policy Marketing (2000) 19(1):20–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Culnan M. J., Bies R. J. Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. J. Soc. Issues (2003) 59(2):323–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donaldson T.The Ethics of International Business (1989) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Donaldson T., Dunfee T. W. Towards a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(2):252–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dowling G. R., Staelin R. A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. J. Consumer Res. (1994) 21(June):119–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dunfee T. W., Smith N. C., Ross W. T. Social contracts and marketing ethics. J. Marketing (1999) 63(July):14–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishbein M., Ajzen I.Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(February):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foxman E. R., Kilcoyne P. Information technology, marketing practice, and consumer privacy: Ethical issues. J. Public Policy Marketing (1993) 12(1):106–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D., Karahanna E., Straub D. W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):51–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilliland S. W. The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(4):694–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodwin C. Privacy: Recognition of a consumer right. J. Public Policy Marketing (1991) 10(1):149–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grazioli S., Jarvenpaa S. L. Perils of Internet fraud: An empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. IEEE Tran. Systems, Man, Cybernetics, Part A: Systems Humans (2000) 30(4):395–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberg J. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J. Management (1990) 16:399–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C.Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings (1995) 4th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Heide J. B., John G. Do norms matter in marketing relationships? J. Marketing (1992) 56(April):32–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman D. L., Novak T. P. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. J. Marketing (1996) 60(July):50–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman D. L., Novak T. P., Peralta M. Building consumer trust online. Comm. ACM (1999) 42(4):80–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu L., Bentler P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Model (1999) 6(1):1–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Tractinsky N. Consumer trust in an internet store: A cross-cultural validation. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. (1999) 5(2). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue2/jarvenpaa.htmlCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jöreskog K., Sorbom D., Toit S., Toit M.LISREL8: New Statistical Features (1999) (Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Keppel G.Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (1991) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Laufer R. S., Wolfe M. Privacy as a concept and a social issue: A multidimensional development theory. J. Soc. Issues (1977) 33(3):22–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luo X. Trust production and privacy concerns on the internet: A framework based on relationship marketing and social exchange theory. Indust. Marketing Management (2002) 31(2):111–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • MacKenzie S. B., Spreng R. A. How does motivation moderate the impact of central and peripheral processing on brand attitudes and intentions? J. Consumer Res. (1992) 18(March):519–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra N. K.Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (2004) 4th ed(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Chervany N. L. What is trust? A conceptual analysis and an interdisciplinary model. Proc. 2000 Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (2000) (Long Beach, CA)827–833Google Scholar
  • McKnight D., Cummings L. L., Chervany N. L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):473–490CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta R., Sivadas E. Direct marketing on the Internet: An empirical assessment of consumer attitudes. J. Direct Marketing (1995) 9(3):21–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meng X., Rosenthal R., Rubin D. B. Comparing correlated coefficients. Psych. Bull. (1992) 111:172–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milberg S. J., Burke S. J., Smith H. J., Kallman E. A. Values, personal information privacy concerns, and regulatory approaches. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(12):65–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milne G. R., Gordon M. E. Direct mail privacy-efficiency trade-offs within an implied social contract framework. J. Public Policy Marketing (1993) 12(2):206–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milne G. R., Rohm A. J. Consumer privacy and name removal across direct marketing channels: Exploring opt-in and opt-out alternatives. J. Public Policy Marketing (2000) 19(2):238–249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mineta N.Opening Statement at Online Privacy Technologies Workshop and Technology Fair (2000) September 19(U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C) . http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/privacy/900workshop/mineta91900.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Miyazaki A. D., Fernandez A. Internet privacy and security: An examination of online retailer disclosures. J. Public Policy Marketing (2000) 19(1):54–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miyazaki A. D., Fernandez A. Consumer perceptions of privacy and security risks for online shopping. J. Consumer Affairs (2001) 35(1):27–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moorman C., Zaltman G., Deshpande R. Relationships between providers and users of marketing research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(August):314–329CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan R. M., Hunt S. D. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Marketing (1994) 58(3):20–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman D., Rao S. Regulatory aspects of privacy and security: A view from the advanced communications technologies and services programme. Inform. Comm. Tech. Law (2000) 9(2):161–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nowak G. J., Phelps J. Understanding privacy concerns: An assessment of consumers' information-related knowledge and beliefs. J. Direct Marketing (1992) 6(4):28–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nowak G. J., Phelps J. Direct marketing and the use of individual-level consumer information: Determining how and when “privacy” matters. J. Direct Marketing (1995) 9(3):46–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou P. A., Gefen D. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(1):37–59LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pew Internet Project Trust and privacy online: Why Americans want to rewrite the rules. Pew Internet & American Life Project (2000) . http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/toc.asp?Report=19Google Scholar
  • Phelps J., Nowak G., Ferrell E. Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information. J. Public Policy Marketing (2000) 19(1):27–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Regan P. M.Legislating Privacy: Technology, Social Values, and Public Policy (1995) (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC) Google Scholar
  • Rendleman J. Customer data means money. InformationWeek (2001) 851(August):49–50Google Scholar
  • Rogers T. B.The Psychological Testing Enterprise (1995) (Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
  • Shapiro D. L., Buttner E. H., Barry B. Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1994) 58:346–368CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheehan K. B., Hoy M. G. Dimensions of privacy concern among online consumers. J. Public Policy Marketing (2000) 19(1):62–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sirdeshmukh D., Singh J., Sabol B. Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. J. Marketing (2002) 66(January):15–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith H. J., Milberg S. J., Burke S. J. Information privacy: Measuring individuals' concerns about organizational practices. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):167–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steenkamp J. E. M., Baumgartner H. Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 25(June):78–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart K. A., Segars A. H. An empirical examination of the concern for information privacy instrument. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(1):36–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D., Karahanna E. Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: Toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(2):160–175LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D., Marie-Claude B., Gefen D. Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Comm. AIS (2004) 13(Article 24):380–427Google Scholar
  • Thibaut J., Walker L.Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis (1975) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Tyler T. R. Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 67:850–863CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of CommerceDigital economy 2002 (2002) . http://www.esa.doc.gov/pdf/DE2002r1.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • University of California–Los Angeles Center for Communication Policy (2001) . The UCLA Internet report 2001: Surveying the digital future. http://ccp.ucla.edu/pdf/UCLA-Internet-Report-2001.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N. Strategic orientation of business enterprises—The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):942–962LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang P., Petrison L. A. Direct marketing activities and personal privacy: A consumer survey. J. Direct Marketing (1993) 7(1):7–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webster J., Trevino L. K. Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: Two policy capturing studies. Acad. Management J. (1995) 28(6):1544–1572CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Westin A. F. Privacy and Freedom (1967) (Athenaum, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wulf K. D., Odekerken-Schröder G., Iacobucci D. Investments in consumer relationships: A cross-country and cross-industry exploration. J. Marketing (2001) 65(October):33–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zucker Lynne G. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. Res. Organ. Behavior (1986) 8:53–111Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.