Deploying Common Systems Globally: The Dynamics of Control

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1040.0036

References

  • Ambrosio J., Deans C., Jurison J. Global softwhere? Information Technology in a Global Business Environment (1996) (Boyd & Fraser Publishing Company, Danvers, MA) 303–306Google Scholar
  • Birnberg J. G., Snodgrass C. Culture and control: A field study. Accounting, Organ. Soc. (1988) 13(5):447–464CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cardinal L. B. Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(1):19–36LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carmel E.Global Software Teams: Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones (1999) (Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River NJ) Google Scholar
  • Choudhury V., Sabherwal R. Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(3):291–314LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clark C. E., Cavanaugh N. C., Brown C. V., Sambamurthy V. Building change-readiness capabilities in the IS organization: Insights from the Bell Atlantic experience. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(4):425–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Collins R. W., Kirsch L. J.Crossing Boundaries: The Deployment of Global IT Solutions (1999) (Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
  • Crisp C. B. Control enactment in global virtual teams. Acad. Management Annual Meeting (2002) (August)(Denver, CO)Google Scholar
  • Das T. K., Teng B. Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(3):491–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Sci. (1985) 31(2):134–149LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartwick J., Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Sci. (1994) 40(4):440–465LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson J. C., Lee S. Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Sci. (1992) 38(6):757–777LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ives B., Jarvenpaa S. L. Applications of global information technology: Key issues for management. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(1):33–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaworski B. J. Toward a theory of marketing control: Environmental context, control types, and consequences. J. Marketing (1988) 52(3):23–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karimi J., Konsynski B. R. Globalization and information management strategies. J. Management Inform. Systems (1991) 7(4):7–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • King W. R., Sethi V. Patterns in the organization of transnational information systems. Inform. Management (2001) 38(4):201–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch L. J. The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(1):1–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch L. J. Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):215–239LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch L. J., Sambamurthy V., Ko D., Purvis R. L. Controlling information systems development projects: The view from the client. Management Sci. (2002) 48(4):484–498LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kuljis J., Robert D. M., Paul R. J. Information gathering problems in multinational banking. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (1998) 7(3):233–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lai V. S. Issues of international information systems management: A perspective of affiliates. Inform. Management (2001) 38(4):253–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langley A. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(4):691–710CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madill A., Jordan A., Shirley C. Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. Brit. J. Psych. (2000) 91(1):1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mähring M. IT project governance. (2002) . Ph.D. dissertation, Stockholm School of Economics, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L., Benjamin R. I. Change agentry—The next IS frontier. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(4):385–407CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Nidumolu S. R., Subramani M. R. The matrix of control: Combining process and structure approaches to managing software development. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003–2004) 20(3):159–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • O'Brien J. A.Management Information Systems: Managing Information Technology in the Business Enterprise6th ed.(McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G. The transmission of control through organizational hierarchy. Acad. Management J. (1978) 21(2):173–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. (1979) 25(9):833–848LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25(1):129–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G., Jaeger A. M. Type Z organization: Stability in the midst of mobility. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3(2):305–314CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D., Franz C., Farrow D. Group process and conflict in systems development. Management Sci. (1989) 35(10):1172–1191LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Kirsch L. J. An integrative framework of the information systems development process. Decision Sci. (2000) 31(2):391–411CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snell S. A. Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(2):292–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Strauss A., Corbin J.Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Tractinsky N., Jarvenpaa S. L. Information systems design decisions in a global versus domestic context. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(4):507–534CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whitley R. Firms, institutions and management control: The comparative analysis of coordination and control systems. Accounting, Organ. Soc. (1999) 24(5–6):507–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.