Perceived Individual Collaboration Know-How Development Through Information Technology–Enabled Contextualization: Evidence from Distributed Teams

References

• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Algina J., Olejnik S. Sample size tables for correlation analysis with applications in partial correlation and multiple regression analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Res. (2003) 38:309–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:321–341Link, Google Scholar
• Bentler P. M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psych. Bull. (1990) 107(2):238–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bentler P. M.EQS Structural Equations Program Manual (1993) (BMDP Statistical Software, Los Angeles, CA) Google Scholar
• Bentler P. M., Bonett D. G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psych. Bull. (1980) 88:588–606Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bentler P. M., Weeks D. G. Interrelations among models for the analysis of moment structures. Multivariate Behavioral Res. (1979) 14:169–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bentler P. M., Weeks D. G. Linear structural equations with latent variables. Psychometrika (1980) 45:289–308Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhappu A. D., Zellmer-Bruhn M., Anand V., Beyerlein M. M., Johnson D. A., Beyerlein S. T. The effects of demographic diversity and virtual work environments on knowledge processing in teams. Virtual Teams (2001) 8(JAI Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackler F. Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organ. Stud. (1995) 16(6):1021–1046Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boland R., Tenkasi R., Te’eni D. Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(3):456–475Link, Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizing knowledge. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):90–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):442–455Link, Google Scholar
• Carlson J. R., Zmud R. W. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(2):153–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carte T. A., Russell C. J. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):479–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):189–217Link, Google Scholar
• Clark H. H., Brennan S. E., Resnick L. B., Levine R. M., Teasley S. D. Grounding in communication. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (1991) (American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:346–371Link, Google Scholar
• Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):352–364Link, Google Scholar
• Daft R., Lengel R. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32:554–571Link, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Faniel I., Majchrzak A. Designing IT for knowledge reuse in a complex uncertain environment. Minnesota Sympos. Knowledge Management (2003) (Minneapolis, MN)Google Scholar
• Finholt T. A., Sproull L., Kiesler S., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Outsiders on the inside: Sharing know-how across space and time. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• George J. M. Personality, affect and behavior in groups. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 75:107–116Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gladstein D. L. Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(December):499–517Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gold A. H., Malhotra A., Segars A. H. Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(2):185–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhue D. L. Development and measurement validity of task-technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information systems. Decision Sci. (1998) 29(1):169–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhue D. L., Thompson R. L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 213–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhue D. L., Klein B. D., March S. T. User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance. Inform. Management (2000) 24(4):547–567Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organization capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):375–387Link, Google Scholar
• Hatano G., Inagaki K., Resnick L. B., Levine J. M., Teasley S. D. Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. Perspectives in Social Shared Cognition (1991) (American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hedberg B., Jonsson S. Designing semi-confusing information systems for organizations in changing environments. Accounting, Organ. Soc. (1978) 3(1):47–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Bailey D. E. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):615–632Link, Google Scholar
• Huberman B. A., Loch C. H. Collaboration, motivation, and size of organizations. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (1996) 6(2):109–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):791–815Link, Google Scholar
• Kirkman B. L., Shapiro D. L. Understanding why team members won’t share: An examination factors related to employee receptivity to team-based rewards. Small Group Res. (2000) 31(2):175–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishna A., Shrader E. Social capital assessment tool. Conf. Paper Soc. Capital Poverty Reduction (1999) World Bank, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
• Lichtenstein R., Alexander J. A., Jinnet K., Ullman E. Embedded intergroup relations in interdisciplinary teams: Effects on perceptions of level of team integration. J. Appl. Behavioral Sci. (1997) 33(4):413–434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Malhtora A., Stamps J., Lipnack J. Can absence make a team grow stronger? Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) MayGoogle Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Rice R. E., Malhotra A., King N., Ba S. Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):569–600Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Majchrzak A. Enabling knowledge creation in far-flung teams: Best practices for IT support and knowledge sharing. J. Knowledge Management (2004) 8(4):75–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Majchrzak A., Carman R., Lott V. Radical innovation without collocation: A case study at Boeing-Rocketdyne. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2):229–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mannix E. A., Griffith T., Neale M. A., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. The phenomenology of conflict in distributed work teams. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambrdige, MA) Google Scholar
• Mark G., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Conventions for coordinating electronic distributed work: A longitudinal study of groupware use. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Markus M. L. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(4):502–527Link, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L., Majchrzak A., Gasser L. A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(3):179–212Google Scholar
• Maznevski M. L., Chudoba K. M. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):473–492Link, Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E. Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Res. (1991) 22(2):147–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E., Berdahl J. L., Tindale R. S., et al. Groups, technology and time: Use of computers for collaborative work. Theory and Research on Small Groups (1998) (Plenum Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Olson J. S., Teasley S., Covi L., Olson G., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. The (currently) unique advantages of collocated work. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Paldam M. Social capital: One or many? Definition and measurement. J. Econom. Surveys (2000) 14(5):629–653Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paldam M., Svendsen G. T.Trust, Social Capital and Economic Growth: An International Comparison (2003) (Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) Google Scholar
• Perrow C. A framework for comparative organizational analysis. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1967) 16:444–459Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riopelle K., Gluesing J. C., Alcordo T. C., Baba M. L., Britt D., McKether W., Monplaisir L., Horn Ratner H., Harris Wagner K., Gibson C. B., Cohen S. G. Context, task, and the evolution of technology in global virtual teams. Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness (2003) (Josey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Ryles G.The Concept of Mind (1949) (Hutchinson, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Saunders C., Zmud R. Virtual teams: Piecing together the puzzle. Framing the Domains of IT Management (2000) (Pinnaflex, Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
• Shrout P. E., Fleiss J. L. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psych. Bull. (1979) 86(2):420–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sirdeshmukh D., Singh J., Sabol B. Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. J. Marketing (2002) 66(1):15–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. (1986) 32:1492–1512Link, Google Scholar
• Star R., Gasser L., Huhns M. The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects. Distributed Artificial Intelligence (1989) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straus S. G., Olivera F., Griffith T. L. Knowledge acquisition in virtual teams. Technology: Research on Managing Groups and Teams (2003) (JAI Press, Stamford, CT) Google Scholar
• Sussman S. W., Siegel W. S. Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(1):47–65Link, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G. The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):9–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Te’eni D. Review: A cognitive-affective model of organizational communication for designing IT. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2):251–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tyre M. J., von Hippel E. The situated nature of adaptive learning in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(1):71–83Link, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B. Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediate collaboration. Human Comm. Res. (1995) 23:342–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Meader D. K., Jessup L., Valachich J. S. Sensemaking and group support systems. Group Support Systems: New Perspectives (1993) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
• Weisband S., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: Implications for leadership and performance. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Withey M., Daft R. L., Cooper W. H. Measures of Perrow’s work unit technology: An empirical assessment and a new scale. Acad. Management J. (1983) 26(1):45–63Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yeatts D. E., Hyten C.High-Performing Self-Managed Work Teams: A Comparison of Theory to Practice (1998) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zigurs I., Buckland B. K. A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quart. (1998) September):313–334Crossref, Google Scholar