Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0045

References

  • Amit R., Zott C. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(6–7):493–520CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Austin J. E.Managing in Developing Countries (1990) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bakos Y. The emerging role of electronic marketplaces on the Internet. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(8):35–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baroudi J. J., Orlikowski W. J. The problem of statistical power in MIS research. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(1):87–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barua A., Mukhopadhyay T., Zmud R. W. Information technology and business performance: Past, present and future. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future through the Past (2000) (Pinnaflex Education Resources, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
  • Barua A., Kriebel H. C., Mukhopadhyay T. Information technology and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(1):3–23LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barua A., Konana P., Whinston A. B., Yin F. Driving e-business excellence. Sloan Management Rev. (2001) 34(1):36–44Google Scholar
  • Benbasat I., Weber R. Research commentary: Rethinking “diversity” in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):389–398LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bharadwaj A. A resource-based perspective on IT capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):169–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boes D. C., Graybill F. A., Mood A. M.Introduction to the Theory of Statistics (1974) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Kahin B.Understanding the Digital Economy (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Carr N. G. IT doesn’t matter. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) 81(5):41–49Google Scholar
  • Caselli F., Coleman II W. J. Cross-country technology diffusion: The case of computers. The Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(2):328–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterjee D., Grewal R., Sambamurthy V. Shaping up for e-commerce: Institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of Web technologies. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(2):65–89CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chau P. Y. K., Tam K. Y. Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: An exploratory study. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(1):1–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W. Issues and opinion on structure equation modeling. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(1):vii–xviGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons E. K., Row M. C. Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(3):275–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper R. B., Zmud R. W. Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):123–139LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Damanpour F. Organizational size and innovation. Organ. Stud. (1992) 13(3):375–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Damanpour F. Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Sci. (1996) 42(5):693–716LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dasgupta S., Agarwal D., Ioannidis A., Gopalakrishnan S. Determinants of information technology adoption: An extension of existing models to firms in a developing country. J. Global Inform. Management (1999) 7(3):41–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dedrick J., Gurbaxani V., Kraemer K. L. Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Comput. Surveys (2003) 35(1):1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependant variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Devaraj S., Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):273–289LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S., Kraemer K. L. Information technology and productivity: Evidence from country-level data. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):548–562LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S., Michael S., Min C. Firm characteristics and investments in information technology: Scale and scope effects. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(3):219–232LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dos Santos B., Peffers K. Competitor and vendor influence on the adoption of innovative applications in electronic commerce. Inform. Management (1998) 34(3):175–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ernst D. A. H., Christensen J. F. Digital information systems and global flagship networks. The Industrial Dynamics of the New Digital Economy (2003) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) Google Scholar
  • Fichman R. G., Zmud R. The diffusion and assimilation of information technology innovations. Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future through the Past (2000) (Pinnaflex Publishing, Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
  • Fichman R. G., Kemerer C. The assimilation of software process innovation: An organizational learning perspective. Management Sci. (1997) 43(10):1345–1363LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement errors. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenspan A. Federal Reserve Board’s semiannual monetary policy report to the Congress. (2002) . www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/hh/2002/march/testimony.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Grover V. An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based interorganizational systems. Decision Sci. (1993) 24(3):603–640CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart P. J., Saunders C. S. Emerging electronic partnerships: Antecedents and dimensions of EDI use from the supplier’s perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 14(4):87–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt L. Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):134–149LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iacovou C. L., Benbasat I., Dexter A. S. Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(4):465–485CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • International Data CorporationWorldwide Black Book (2002) (International Data Corporation, Framingham, MA) Google Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S., Leidner D. An information company in Mexico: Extending the resource-based view of the firm to a developing country context. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(4):342–361LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson B. Retail: The Wal-Mart effect. The McKinsey Quart. (2002) 1:40–43Google Scholar
  • Kaplan D., Hoyle R. H. Statistical power in structure equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, Concepts, Issues, and Applications (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 100–117Google Scholar
  • Kraemer K. L., Dedrick J. Payoffs from investment in information technology: Lessons from the Asia-Pacific region. World Development (1994) 22(12):1921–1931CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kwon T. H., Zmud R. W., Boland R. J., Hirschheim R. A. Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. Critical Issues in Information Systems Research (1987) (John Wiley, New York) 227–251Google Scholar
  • Lee H., Padmanabhan V., Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):546–558LinkGoogle Scholar
  • MacCallum R. C., Browne M. W., Sugawara H. M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psych. Methods (1996) 1(2):130–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T., Laubacher R. The dawn of the e-lance economy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) 76(5):145–152Google Scholar
  • Marsh H., Hocevar D. A new, more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (1985) 73(1):107–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martinsons M. G., Martinsons V. Rethinking the value of IT, again. Comm. ACM (2002) 45(7):25–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mata F., Fuerst W., Barney J. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(4):487–505CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKinsey and Company (2002) . U.S. productivity report: 1995–2000 www.mckinsey.com/knowledgeGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(3):511–528Google Scholar
  • Mukhopadhyay T., Kekre S., Kalathur S. Business value of information technology: A study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):137–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nord W., Tucker S.Implementing Routine and Radical Innovation (1987) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
  • Oxley J. E., Yeung B. E-commerce readiness: Institutional environment and international competitiveness. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2001) 32(4):705–723CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peteraf M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(3):179–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S., Lee J.-Y., Podskoff N. Common method biases in behavior research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pohjola M., Pohjola M. Information technology and economic growth: A cross-country analysis. Information Technology and Economic Development. (2001) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 242–256Google Scholar
  • Porter M. Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) 79:63–78Google Scholar
  • Porter M., Millar V. How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1985) 63(4):149–160Google Scholar
  • Ramamurthy K., Premkumar G., Crum M. R. Organizational and interorganizational determinants of EDI diffusion and organizational performance: A cause model. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (1999) 9(4):253–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (1983) 3rd ed.(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rosenzweig P. M. When can management science research be generalized internationally? Management Sci. (1994) 40(1):28–39LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ross J., Beath C., Goodhue D. Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 38(1):31–42Google Scholar
  • Sethi V., King W. R. Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage. Management Sci. (1994) 40(12):1601–1627LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro C., Varian H.Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Shih E., Dedrick J., Kraemer K. L. International diffusion of e-commerce: Impacts of rule of law and access cost. Comm. ACM. (2005) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Slaughter S., Ang S. Employment structures of information systems personnel: A comparative study of the U.S. and Singapore. Inform. Tech. People (1995) 8(2):17–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soh C., Markus M. L., Ariav G., Beath C., DeGross J., Hoyer R., Kemerer C. F. How IT creates business value: A process theory synthesis. Proc. 16th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1995) (Association for Information Systems, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
  • Steinfield C., Adelaar T., Lai Y. Integrating brick and mortar locations with e-commerce: Understanding synergy opportunities. Proc. Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2002) Big Island, HawaiiCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steward K. A., Segars A. H. An empirical examination of the concern for information privacy instrument. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(1):36–49LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D. Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(2):147–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D., Hoffman D., Weber B., Steinfield C. Toward new metrics for Net-enhanced organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):227–238LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Swanson E. B. Information systems innovation among organizations. Management Sci. (1994) 40(9):1069–1092LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Economics of scope and the scope of the enterprise. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1980) 1(2):223–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teo H. H., Wei K. K., Benbasat I. Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):19–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thong J. Y. L. An integrated model of information systems adoption in small business. J. Management Inform. Systems (1999) 15(4):187–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tornatzky L. G., Fleischer M.The Processes of Technological Innovation (1990) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) Google Scholar
  • Tornatzky L. G., Klein K. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1982) 29(1):28–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treacy M., Wiersema F. Customer intimacy and other value disciplines. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(1):84–93Google Scholar
  • Umanath N. S., Campbell T. L. Differential diffusion of information systems technology in multinational enterprises: A research model. Inform. Resources Management J. (1994) 7(1):6–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatraman N., Zaheer A. Electronic integration and strategic advantage: A quasi-experimental study in the insurance industry. Inform. Systems Res. (1990) 1(4):377–393LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weill P., Broadbent M.Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Welty B., Becerra-Fernandez I. Managing trust and commitment in collaborative supply chain relationships. Comm. ACM (2001) 44(6):67–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E., Ronen J. Organizational innovation: The transaction cost approach. Entrepreneurship. (1983) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) 101–133Google Scholar
  • Xu S., Zhu K., Gibbs J. Global technology, local adoption: A cross-country investigation of Internet adoption by companies in the United States and China. Electronic Markets (2004) 14(1):13–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu K. Information transparency of business-to-business electronic markets: A game-theoretic analysis. Management Sci. (2004a) 50(5):670–685LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu K. The complementarity of information technology infrastructure and e-commerce capability: A resource-based assessment of their business value. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004b) 21(1):167–202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu K., Kraemer K. L. E-commerce metrics for Net-enhanced organizations: Assessing the value of e-commerce to firm performance in the manufacturing sector. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):275–295LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu K., Kraemer K. L., Xu S. Electronic business adoption by European firms: A cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2003) 12(4):251–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu K., Kraemer K. L., Xu S., Dedrick J. Information technology payoff in e-business environments: An international perspective on value creation of e-business in the financial services industry. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(1):17–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.