Editorial Notes

References

• Agarwal R., Lucas H. The information systems identity crisis: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research. MIS Quart.In pressGoogle Scholar
• Benbasat I., Zmud R. W. The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):183–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G. The social life of information systems research. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2003) 4(7):360–376Google Scholar
• El Sawy O. The three faces of IS identity: Connection, immersion, and fusion. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2003) 12:588–598Google Scholar
• Gray Paul. Introduction to the debate on the core of the information systems field. Comm. Assoc. Inform. System (2003) 12(NovemberGoogle Scholar
• Lyytinen K., King J. Nothing at the center? Academic legitimacy in the information systems field. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2004) 5(6):220–246Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Iaccono C. S. Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research: A call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(2):121–134Link, Google Scholar
• Robey D. Identity, legitimacy, and the dominant research paradigm: An alternative prescription for the IS discipline. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2003) 4(6):352–359Google Scholar
• Saunders C. S. Editor’s comments: Looking for diamond cutters. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):iii–viiiCrossref, Google Scholar
• Whinston A. B., Geng X. Operationalizing the essential role of the information technology artifact in information systems research: Gray area, pitfalls, and the importance of strategic ambiguity. MIS Quart. (2004) June):149–159Crossref, Google Scholar