Reputation Mechanism Design in Online Trading Environments with Pure Moral Hazard

References

• Anderson E. W. Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. J. Service (1998) 1(1):5–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blackwell D. A. Comparison of experiments. Proc. 2nd Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probab. (1951) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) 93–102Google Scholar
• Blackwell D. Equivalent comparison of experiments. Ann. Math. Statist. (1953) 24:265–272Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L., Hortacsu A. The dynamics of seller reputation: Theory and evidence from eBay. (2004) . Working Paper W10363, National Bureau of Economic Research http://ssrn.com/abstract=516704Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C. The digitization of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1407–1424Link, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C. Simultaneous auctions of imperfect substitute goods by sellers of different reputations. (2004) . Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
• Dellarocas C., Fan M., Wood C. Self-interest, reciprocity, and participation in online reputation systems. (2003) . Workshop in Information Systems and Economics (WISE), Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
• Dewatripont M., Jewitt I., Tirole J. The economics of career concerns, part I: Comparing information structures. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66(1):183–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman E., Resnick P. The social cost of cheap pseudonyms. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2001) 10(1):173–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Levine D. K. Efficiency and observability with long-run and short-run players. J. Econom. Theory (1994) 62:103–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green E. J., Porter R. H. Noncooperative collusion under imperfect price information. Econometrica (1984) 52:87–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greif A. Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The Maghribi traders' coalition. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1993) 83:525–548Google Scholar
• Kandori M., Matsushima H. Private observation, communication and collusion. Econometrica (1998) 66(3):627–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein B., Leffler K. The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89(4):615–641Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein D.Reputation: Studies in the Voluntary Elicitation of Good Conduct (1997) (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuwabara K. Decomposing reputation effects: Sanctioning or signaling? (2003) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Milgrom P. R., North D., Weingast B. R. The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Econom. Politics (1990) 2:1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller N., Resnick P., Zeckhauser R. Eliciting honest feedback in electronic markets. (2002) . Research Working Paper RWP02-039, Harvard Kennedy School, MAGoogle Scholar
• Resnick P., Zeckhauser R., Baye Michael R. Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay's reputation system. The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce. Advances in Applied Microeconomics (2002) 11(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P., Zeckhauser R., Friedman E., Kuwabara K. Reputation systems. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(12):45–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C. Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. Quart. J. Econom. (1983) 98(4):659–680Crossref, Google Scholar