Collaborating on Multiparty Information Systems Development Projects: A Collective Reflection-in-Action View

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0055

References

  • Agar M.The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography (1980) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Andersen N. E.Professional Systems Development: Experience, Ideas, and Action (1990) (Prentice Hall, New York) Google Scholar
  • Austin R. The effects of time pressure on quality in software development: An agency model. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(2):195–207LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barki H., Hartwick J. Interpersonal conflict and its management in information system development. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2):195–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barley S. R. Images of imaging: Notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organ. Sci. (1990) 1(1):220–247LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Crossing occupational boundaries: Communication and learning on a production floor. (1999) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Bechky B. A. Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a product floor. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):312–330LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bødker S. Understanding representation in design. Human-Comput. Interaction (1998) 13(2):107–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bødker S. Scenarios in user-centred design—Setting the stage for reflection and action. Interacting Comput. (2000) 13(1):61–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P.Outline of a Theory of Practice (1977) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bourdieu P.Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action (1998) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
  • Bowker G. Lest we remember: Organizational forgetting and the production of knowledge. Accounting, Management Inform. Tech. (1997) 7(3):113–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowker G., Timmermans S., Star S. L., Orlikowski W. J., Walsham G., Jones M. R., DeGross J. I. Infrastructure and organizational transformations: Classifying nurses' work. Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work (1996) (Chapman and Hall, London, UK) 344–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Briers M., Chua W. F. The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: A field study of an implementation of activity-based costing. Accounting, Organ. Soc. (2001) 26(3):237–269CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bunderson J. S. Team member functional background and involvement in management teams: Direct effects and the moderating role of power centralization. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(4):458–474CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Byrd T. A., Cossick K. L., Zmud R. W. A synthesis of research on requirements analysis and knowledge acquisition techniques. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(1):117–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. Understanding knowledge transformation in product development: Making knowledge manifest through boundary objects. (1997) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):442–455LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Carlile P. R. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):555–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Choudhury V., Sabherwal R. Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):291–314LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clegg S. R., Kornberger M., Rhodes C. Noise, parasites and translation—Theory and practice in management consulting. Management Learning (2004) 35(1):31–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elkjaer B., Flensburg P., Mouritsen J., Willmott H. The commodification of expertise: The case of systems development consulting. Accounting, Management Inform. Tech. (1991) 1(2):139–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epstein J.Book Business: Publishing Past, Present, and Future (2001) (W. W. Norton, New York) Google Scholar
  • Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46(12):1554–1568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gable G. G., Chin W. W., Sarkar S., Storey V., DeGross J. I. Client versus consultant influence on client involvement in computer system selection projects: A two-actor model of the theory of planned behavior. Proc. Twenty-Second Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2001) New Orleans, LA:249–260Google Scholar
  • Giddens A.The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration (1984) (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) Google Scholar
  • Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine Pub. Co., Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Guinan P., Cooprider S., Faraj S. Enabling software development team performance during requirement definition: A behavioral versus technical approach. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9:101–125LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Handley K., Sturdy A., Clark T., Fincham R., Newell S. Client-consultant relations and the role of challenge. Proc. Organ. Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities (2005) Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Hardy C., Clegg S. R., Clegg S., Hardy C., Nord W. R. Some dare call it power. Handbook of Organization Studies (1996) (Sage Publications, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Hardy C., Lawrence T. B., Grant D. Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(1):58–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson K. Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Sci. Tech., Human Value (1991) 16(4):448–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoegl M., Gemuenden H. G. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):435LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iivari J., Hirschheim R. A., Klein H. A paradigmatic analysis of contrasting information systems development approaches and methodologies. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(2):164–193LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jacobson I.Object-oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach (1993) (ACM Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Jasperson J., Carte T. A., Saunders C. S., Butler B. S., Cross H., Zheng W. Review: Power and information technology research: A metatriangulation review. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(4):397–459CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kern T., Willcocks L.The Relationship Advantage: Information Technologies, Sourcing, and Management (2001) (Oxford University Press, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kilker J. Conflict on collaborative design teams: Understanding the role of social identities. IEEE Tech. Soc. Magazine (1999) 18(3):12–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim J. Y., King J. L. Boundary instances in heterogeneous engineering teams: Trouble management in the dram manufacturing process. Res. Managing Groups Teams (2000) 3:79–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch L., Sambamurthy V., Ko D.-G., Purvis R. Controlling information systems development projects: The view from the client. Management Sci. (2002) 48(4):484–498LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kraut R. E., Streeter L. A. Coordination in software development. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(3):69–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kyng M. Representations of work: Making representations work. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(9):46–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee A. S., Baskerville R. L. Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(3):221–243LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard D., Swap W. C.When Sparks Fly: Igniting Creativity in Groups (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Levina N. Multi-party information systems development: The challenge of cross-boundary collaboration. (2001) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Levina N., Vaast E. The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for information systems' implementation and use. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(2):335–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maguire S., Hardy C., Lawrence T. B. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDA treatment advocacy in Canada. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(5):657–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Merriam-WebsterMerriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (1998) 10th ed.(Merriam-Webster, Springfield, MA) Google Scholar
  • Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (1984) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Morrison E. W., Milliken F. J. Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(4):706–725CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M., Noble F. User involvement as an interaction process: A case study. Inform. Systems Res. (1990) 1(1):89–113LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M., Robey D. A social-process model of user-analyst relationships. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(2):249–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–428LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):249–273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pawlowski S. D., Robey D. Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(4):645–672CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Polzer J. T., Milton L. P., Swann W. B. Capitalizing on diversity: Interpersonal congruence in small work groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(2):296–324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E. W. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):502–517LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D. Modeling interpersonal processes during system-development—Further thoughts and suggestions. Inform. Systems Res. (1994) 5(4):439–445LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D., Smith L., Vijaysarathy L. Perceptions of conflict and success in information systems development projects. J. Management Inform. Systems (1993) 10(1):123–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sabherwal R. The role of trust in outsourced IS development projects. Comm. ACM (1999) 42(2):80–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Kirsch L. J. An integrative framework of the information systems development process. Decision Sci. (2000) 31(2):391–411CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarker S., Sahay S. Understanding virtual team development: An interpretive study. J. Association Inform. Systems (2003) 4:1–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidt K., Hayne S. C., Prinz W., Augustin S., Pendergast M., Schmidt K. Of maps and scripts—The status of formal constructs in cooperative work. Proc. Internat. ACM SIGGROUP Conf. Supporting Group Work: The Integration Challenge (1997) (ACM Press, New York) 138–147CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schön D. A.The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (1983) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schrage M.Serious Play : How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Schwartzman H. B.Ethnography in Organizations (1993) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Star S. L., Huhn M., Gasser L. The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence (1989) (Morgan Kaufman, Menlo Park, CA) 37–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Star S. L., Griesemer J. R. Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907–39. Soc. Studies Sci. (1989) 19:387–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suchman L. Representations of work: Making work visible. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(9):56–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Loch C. H. Collaborative prototyping and the pricing of custom-designed products. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):145–158LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J. The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1979) 24:539–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Maanen J., Barley S., Cummings L. L., Straw B. M. Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (1984) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 287–365Google Scholar
  • Yakura E. Practices of power: Meaning and legitimation in information technology consulting. (1993) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.