Optimal Software Development: A Control Theoretic Approach

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0059

References

  • Bass F. M. A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15(5):215–227LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bass F. M., Gordon K., Ferguson T. L., Githens M. L. DIRECTV: Forecasting diffusion of a new technology prior to product launch. Interfaces (2001) 31(3, Part 2 of 2):S82–LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Beizer B.Software Testing Techniques (1990) (International Thomson Computer Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Blackburn J. D., Scudder G. D., Van Wassenhove L. N. Concurrent software development. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(11):200–214Google Scholar
  • Boehm B. W., McClean R., Urfrig D. Some experiments with automated aids to the design of large scale reliable software. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1975) 1(1):125–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiang I. R., Mookerjee V. S. A fault threshold policy to manage software development projects. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(1):3–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cusumano M. A., Shelby R. W. How Microsoft builds software. Comm. ACM (1997) 40(6):53–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dohi T., Nishio Y., Osaki S. Optimal software release scheduling based on artificial neural networks. Ann. Software Engrg.: Software Reliability, Testing Maturity (1999) 8:167–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fagan M. E. Advances in software inspections. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1986) 12(7):744–751CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feng Q., Mookerjee V. S., Sethi S. P. Application development using modifiable off-the-shelf software. (2003) . Working paper, School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Goel A. L., Okumoto K. A time dependent error detection model for software reliability and other performance measures. IEEE Trans. Reliability (1979) 28(3):206–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grunbacher P., Hofer C. Complementing XP with requirements negotiation. Third Internat. Conf. Extreme Programming Agile Processes Software Engrg (2002) Sardinia, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  • Ha A. Y., Porteus E. L. Optimal timing of reviews in concurrent design for manufacturability. Management Sci. (1995) 41(9):1431–1447LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hailpern B., Santhanam P. Software debugging, testing, and verification. IBM Systems J. (2002) 41(1):4–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harter D. E., Slaughter S. A. Quality improvement and infrastructure activity cost in software development: A longitudinal analysis. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):784–800LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes M. Quest for quality. Inform. Week (2003) May 26). http:// www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID =101001.51Google Scholar
  • Heller G., Valett J., Wild M.Data Collection Procedures for the Software Engineering Laboratory (SEL) Database (1993) (Software Engineering Laboratory (SEL), NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, MD) Google Scholar
  • Hou R. H., Kuo S. Y., Chang Y. P. Optimal release times for software systems with scheduled delivery time based on the HGDM. IEEE Trans. Comput. (1997) 46(2):216–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kimura M., Toyota T., Yamada S. Economic analysis of software release problems with warranty cost and reliability requirement. Reliability Engrg. System Safety (1999) 66(1):49–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Korn G. A., Korn T. M.Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers (2000) (Dover Publications Inc., Mineola, NY) Google Scholar
  • Mookerjee V. S., Chiang R. I. A dynamic coordination policy for software system construction. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (2002) 28(7):684–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Myers G. J.Software Reliability: Principles and Practices (1976) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Pham H., Zhang X. A software cost model with warranty and risk costs. IEEE Trans. Comput. (1999) 48(1):71–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Research Triangle Institute (RTI) The economic impacts of inadequate infrastructure for software testing. (2002) . RTI Project 7007.011, National Institute of Standards and Technology, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Sethi S. P., Thompson G.Optimal Control Theory: Applications to Management Science and Economics (2000) 2nd ed.(Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Yamada S., Osaki S. Software-reliability growth modeling: Models and applications. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1985) 11(12):1431–1437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yamada S., Hishitani J., Osaki S. Software-reliability growth with a Weibull test-effort, a model & application. IEEE Trans. Reliability (1993) 42(1):100–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.