On Data Reliability Assessment in Accounting Information Systems

References

• Ahituv N., Halpern J., Will H. Audit planning: An algorithmic approach. Contemporary Accounting Res. (1985) 2(1):95–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aho A., Hopcroft D., Ullman J.Data Structures and Algorithms (1983) (Addison Wesley, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• AICPAConsideration of the Internal Control Structure in a Financial Statement Audit. (1990) (AICPA, New York) Google Scholar
• AICPACPA SysTrust: Assuring Reliability of Systems (1999) (AICPA, New York) Google Scholar
• Arens A. A., Loebbecke J. K.Auditing: An Integrated Approach (1997) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Bailey A. D., Duke G. L., Gerlach J., Ko G., Meservy R. D., Whinston A. B. TICOM and the analysis of internal controls. Accounting Rev. (1985) 60(2):186–211Google Scholar
• Ballou D. P., Pazer H. L. Modeling data and process quality in multi-output information systems. Management Sci. (1985) 31(2):150–162Link, Google Scholar
• Bhargava H. K., Kimbrough S. O. Model management: An embedded languages approach. Decision Support Systems (1993) 10(3):277–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodnar G. Reliability modeling of internal control systems. Accounting Rev. (1975) 50(3):747–757Google Scholar
• BPMI.orgBusiness Process Modeling Notation Working Draft 1.0 (2003) August 25). http://www.bpmi.org/speci.cations.espGoogle Scholar
• Business Week For CFO’s a crash course in tech.. (2003) September 30):35–39Google Scholar
• Chinneck J. W. Analyzing mathematical programs using MProbe. Ann. Oper. Res. (2001) 104:33–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooley J. W., Cooley B. J. Internal accounting control systems: A simulation program for assessing their reliabilities. Simulation Games (1982) 13(2):211–231Crossref, Google Scholar
• Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway CommissionInternal Control—Integrated Framework (1994) (AICPA, New York) Google Scholar
• Cormen T. H., Leiserson C. E., Rivest R. L.Introduction to Algorithms (1992) (The MIT Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Davis J. T. Experience and auditors’ selection of relevant information for preliminary control risk assessments. Auditing: J. Practice Theory (1996) 15(1):16–37Google Scholar
• Felix W. L., Niles M. S. Research in internal control evaluation. Auditing: J. Practice Theory (1988) 7(1):43–60Google Scholar
• Feo T. A., Resende M. A probabilistic heuristic for a computationally difficult set covering problem. Oper. Res. Lett. (1989) 8:67–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher M. Optimal solution of set covering/partitioning problems using dual heuristics. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):674–688Link, Google Scholar
• Goff J. Drowning in data. CFO Magazine (2003) 19(11):97–102Google Scholar
• Grant Thornton Accounting and auditing manual. (1996) (Grant Thornton, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Gruber T. R., Allen J. A., Fikes R., Sandewall E. The role of common ontology in achieving sharable, reusable knowledge bases. Principles Knowledge Representation Reasoning: Proc. 2nd Internat. Conf. (1991) (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA) Google Scholar
• Hamlen S. S. A chance-constrained mixed integer programming model for internal control design. Accounting Rev. (1980) 55(3):578–593Google Scholar
• Hamscher W. Analysis of accounting systems via abstraction and simulation results into causal networks. (1992) . Technical Report 25, Price Waterhouse, Menlo Park, CAGoogle Scholar
• Haskins M. E., Nanni A. J. Toward attribute models of accounting control systems: Qualitative versus quantitative approaches. J. Accounting Literature (1987) 6:111–130Google Scholar
• Hollander A. S., Denna E. L., Cherrington J. O.Accounting, Information Technology, and Business Solutions (2000) (Irwin McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Information Systems Audit and Control FoundationCOBIT: Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology (2000) (Information Systems Audit and Control Foundation, Rolling Meadows, IL) Google Scholar
• Kaplan D., Krishnan R., Padman R., Peters J. Assessing data quality in AIS. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(2):72–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelly K. P. Expert problem solving system for the audit planning process. (1985) . Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Knechel W. R. The use of quantitative models in the review and evaluation of internal control: A survey and review. J. Accounting Literature (1983) 2:205–219Google Scholar
• Knechel W. R. An analysis of alternative error assumptions in modeling the reliability of accounting systems. J. Accounting Res. (1985) 23(1):194–212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lea R. B., Adams S. J., Boykin R. F. Modeling of the audit risk assessment process at the assertion level within an account balance. Auditing: J. Practice Theory (1992) 11(Supplement):152–179Google Scholar
• Mcumber W., Cheng B. A general framework for formalizing UML with formal languages. Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. Software Engrg. (2001) (Toronto, Ontario, Canada)433–442Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meservy R. D., Bailey A. D., Johnson P. E. Auditing internal controls: A computational model of the review process. Auditing: J. Practice Theory (1986) 5(2):44–74Google Scholar
• Messier W. F., Ashton R. H., Ashton A. H. Research in and development of audit-decision aids. Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting and Auditing (1995) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 207–230Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milner R. Polyadic Pi-Calculus: A tutorial. Proc. Internat. Summer School Logic Algebra Specification (1992) (Springer-Verlag)Google Scholar
• Nado R., Chams M., Delisio J., Hamscher W. COMET: An application of model-based reasoning to accounting systems. Proc. 8th Innovative Appl. Artificial Intelligence Conf. (1996) (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA) 1482–1490Google Scholar
• Noy N. F., Hafner C. D. Ontological foundations for experimental science knowledge bases. Appl. Artificial Intelligence (2000) 14:565–618Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orr K. Data quality and systems theory. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(2):66–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pierce E. M. Assessing data quality with control matrices. Comm. ACM (2004) 47(2):82–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pipino L. L., Lee Y. W., Wang R. Y. Data quality assessment. Comm. ACM (2002) 45(4):211–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Redman T.Data Quality: The Field Guide (2001) (Digital Press)Google Scholar
• Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) . H.R. 3763Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission SEC implements internal control provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley; adopts investment company R&D safe harbor. (2003) . Press release 2003-66 Haskins, http://www. sec.gov/news/press/2003-66.htmGoogle Scholar
• Ushakov Igor. Handbook for Reliability Engineering (1994) (John Wiley and Sons)Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waller W. S. Auditors’ assessments of inherent and control risk in field settings. Accounting Rev. (1993) 68(4):783–802Google Scholar
• Wand Y., Weber R. An ontological model of an information system. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (1990) 16(11):1282–1292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang R. Y. A product perspective on total data quality management. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(2):58–65Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang R. Y., Storey V. C., Firth C. P. A framework for analysis of data quality research. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. (1995) 7(4):623–640Crossref, Google Scholar