The Impact of E-Commerce on Competition in the Retail Brokerage Industry

References

• Adams W. J., Yellen J. L. Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. Quart. J. Econom. (1976) 90:475–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altschuler S., Batavia D., Bennett J., Labe R., Liao B., Nigam R., Oh J. Pricing analysis for Merrill Lynch Integrated Choice. Interfaces (2002) 32(1):5–19Link, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y., Brynjolfsson E. Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Sci. (1999) 45(12):1613–1630Link, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y., Brynjolfsson E. Bundling and competition on the Internet: Aggregation strategies for information goods. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(1):63–82Link, Google Scholar
• Bakos Y., Lucus H. C., Oh W., Simon G., Viswanathan S., Weber B. Online technical appendix to “The Impact of E-Commerce on Competition in the Retail Brokerage Industry.”. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(4):352–371 http://www. informs.org/ Pubs/Supplements/ISR/ 1526-5336-2005-16-04-0352-tech.app. pdf.Google Scholar
• Battalio R., Greene J., Hatch B., Jennings R. Does the limit order routing decision matter? Rev. Financial Stud. (2002) 15:59–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blume Marshall E., Butcher III Howard. Comment on proposed recession of NYSE Rule 390. (2000) . SEC, SR-NYSE-99-48 (April 26) http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/ny9948/ blume1.htmGoogle Scholar
• Chen P., Hitt L. Measuring switching costs and their determinants in Internet-enabled businesses: A study of the online brokerage industry. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):255–276Link, Google Scholar
• Chuang J. C., Sirbu M., Hurley B. Kahin, Varian H. Network delivery of information goods: Optimal pricing of articles and subscriptions. The Economics of Digital Information Goods (1998) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Clemons E., Weber B. Information technology and screen-based securities trading: Pricing the stock and pricing the trade. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 43(12):1693–1708Google Scholar
• Easley D., Kiefer N., O’Hara M. Cream-skimming or profit sharing? The curious role of purchased order flow. J. Finance (1996) 51(3):811–833Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fay S., MacKie-Mason J. Competition between firms that bundle information goods. (2003) . Working paper, University of Florida, Gainesville, FLGoogle Scholar
• Ip G., Buckman R. Regulators worry that online investors may be getting poor trade executions. Wall Steet J. (1999) April 23Google Scholar
• Konana P., Menon N., Balasubramanian S. Exploring the implications of online investing. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(1):34–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee C. M. Market integration and price execution for NYSE-listed securities. J. Finance (1993) XLVIII(3):1009–1038Crossref, Google Scholar
• McNamee M. Trading online—It’s a jungle out there: How to make sure your trades are getting the best execution. Bus. Week (2000) November 15Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. S. Product and price competition in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1988) 7(2):141–168Link, Google Scholar
• Witter Morgan Stanley Dean. The Internet and financial services. (2000) . Investment research report (January 31)Google Scholar
• Nalebuff B. Bundling as an entry barrier. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(1):159–188Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker G., Van Alstyne M. Information complements, substitutes, and strategic product design. (2004) . Working paper, Tulane University, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
• Pettit D. Special report: On-line investing. Wall Street J. (2001) June 11Google Scholar
• Shaked A., Sutton J. Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1982) 49:3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiro L. N. Merrill’s e-battle. Bus. Week (1999) May 22Google Scholar
• USA Today (2000) July 6Google Scholar
• Varian H. Pricing information goods. Proc. Scholarship New Inform. Environment Sympos. (1995) (Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Wall Street Journal (2001) December 21Google Scholar