Research Note—Two Competing Perspectives on Automatic Use: A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0070

References

  • Aarts H., Dijksterhuis A. Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000) 78(1):53–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aarts H., Verplanken B., van Knippenberg A. Predicting behavior from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit? J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1998) 28(15):1,355–1,374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ackerman P. L. Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: Dynamics of ability determinants. J. Appl. Psych. (1992) 77(5):598–614CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1991) 50:179–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I. Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (2002) 6(2):107–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I., Fishbein M., Stroebe W., Hewstone M. Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European Review of Social Psychology (2000) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) 1–33Google Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. P. Attitudes, intentions and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1981) 41(4):607–627CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. P., Dholakia U. Goal setting and goal striving in consumer behavior. J. Marketing (1999) 63(Special Issue):19–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1988) 16(1):74–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. P., Baumgartner H., Yi Y. State versus action orientation and the theory of reasoned action: An application to coupon usage. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 18(4):505–518CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bamberg S., Ajzen I., Schmidt P. Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. (2003) 25(3):175–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bargh J. A., Barndollar K., Gollwitzer P. M., Bargh J. A. Automaticity in action: The unconscious as repository of chronic goals and motives. The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior (1996) (The Guilford Press, New York) 457–481Google Scholar
  • Bargh J. A., Gollwitzer P. M., Lee-Chai A., Barndollar K., Trötschel R. The automated will: Conscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81(6):1,014–1,027CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bem D., Berkowitz L. Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1972) 6(Academic Press, New York) 1–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Childers T. L., Carr C. L., Peck J., Carson S. Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. J. Retailing (2001) 77:511–535CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Gopal A., Salisbury W. D. Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(4):342–367LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cudeck R., Browne M. W. Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Res. (1983) 18:147–167CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Venkatesh V. Toward prototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: Implications for software project management. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2004) 51(1):31–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):982–1LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1992) 22:1,111–1,132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gollwitzer P. M., Gollwitzer P. M., Bargh J. A. The volitional benefits of planning. The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior (1996) (The Guilford Press, New York) 287–312Google Scholar
  • Harrison D. A., Mykytyn P. P., Riemenschneider C. K. Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small business: Theory and empirical tests. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(2):171–195LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Holbrook M. B., Rust R. T., Oliver R. L. The nature of customer value. An axiology of services in the consumption experience, in service quality. Service Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice (1994) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) 21–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu L., Bentler P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling (1999) 6(1):1–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jasperson J., Carter P. E., Zmud R. W. A comprehensive conceptualization of the post-adoptive behaviors associated with IT-enabled work systems. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):525–557CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jöreskog K. G., Schumacker R. E., Marcoulides G. A. Interaction and nonlinear modeling: Issues and approaches. Interaction and Nonlinear Effects in Structural Equation Modeling (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ) 239–250Google Scholar
  • Jöreskog K., Sörbom D.LISREL8: User’s Reference Guide (1996) (Scientific Software International, Inc., Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Kim S. S., Malhotra N. K. A longitudinal model of continued IS use: An integrative view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):741–755LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kraut R., Mukhopadhyay T., Szczypula J., Kiesler S., Scherlis B. Information and communication: Alternative uses of the Internet in households. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(4):287–303LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lance C. E. Residual centering, exploratory and confirmatory moderator analysis, and decomposition of effects in path models containing interactions. Appl. Psych. Measurement (1988) 12(2):163–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Limayem M., Hirt S. G. Force of habit and information systems usage: Theory and initial validation. J. Association Inform. Systems (2003) 4:65–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Louis M. R., Sutton R. I. Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking. Human Relations (1991) 44(1):55–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marakas G. M., Yi M. Y., Johnson R. D. The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(2):126–163LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mathwick C., Malhotra N. K., Rigdon E. Experiential value: Conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment. J. Retailing (2001) 77:39–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Melone N. P. A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research. Management Sci. (1990) 36(1):76–91LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Novak T. P., Hoffman D. L., Yung Y. Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(1):22–42LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ouellette J. A., Wood W. Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psych. Bull. (1998) 124(1):54–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perse E. M. Involvement with local television news: Cognitive and emotional dimensions. Human Comm. Res. (1990) 16(4):556–581CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ronis D. L., Yates J. F., Kirscht J. P., Pratkanis A. R., Breckler S. J., Greenwald A. G. Attitudes, decisions, and habits as determinants of repeated behavior. Attitude Structure and Function (1989) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 213–239Google Scholar
  • Seddon P. B. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):240–253LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D., Limayem M., Karahanna-Evaristo E. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Sci. (1995) 41(8):1,328–1,342LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Triandis H. C.Interpersonal Behavior (1977) (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA) Google Scholar
  • University of California–Los Angeles Center for Communication PolicyThe UCLA Internet Report: Surveying the Digital Future (Year Three) (2003) . http://ccp.ucla.edu/pdf/UCLA-Internet- Report-Year-Three.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):342–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Brown S. A. A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):71–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Ackerman P. L. A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2000) 83(1):33–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis F. D., Davis G. B. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verplanken B., Aarts H., van Knippenberg A., Moonen A. Habit versus planned behaviour: A field experiment. British J. Soc. Psych. (1998) 37:111–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.