A Two-Stage Model of the Promotional Performance of Pure Online Firms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0071

References

  • Agarwal Ritu, Venkatesh Viswanath. Assessing a firm’s Web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(2):168–186LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blattberg Robert C., Jeuland Abel P. A micromodeling approach to investigate the advertising-sales relationship. Management Sci. (1981) 27(9):988–1005LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Boyes William, Dennis J., Hoffman L., Low Stuart A. An econometric analysis of the bank credit scoring problem. J. Econometrics (1989) 40:1–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg Bart. Advertising frequency decisions in a discrete Markov process under a budget constraint. J. Marketing Res. (1998) XXXV(August):399–406CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Broussard Gerard. How advertising frequency can work to build online advertising effectiveness. Internat. J. Market Res. (2000) 42(4):439–457CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklin Randolph E., Sismeiro Catarina. A model of Web site browsing behavior estimated on clickstream data. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(3):249–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Pei-Yu, Hitt Lorin M. Measuring switching costs and their determinants in Internet enabled businesses: A study of the online brokerage industry. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):255–274LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clarke Darral G. Econometric measurement of the duration of advertising effect on sales. J. Marketing Res. (1976) XIII(November):345–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Degeratu Alexandru, Rangaswamy Arvind, Wu Jianan. Consumer choice behavior in online and traditional supermarkets: The effects of brand name, price, and other search attributes. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2000) 17(1):55–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devaraj Sarv, Fan Ming, Kohli Rajiv. Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: Validating ecommerce metrics. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):316–333LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Diamond Daniel S. A quantitative approach to magazine advertisement format selection. J. Marketing Res. (1968) V(November):376–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ebbinghaus H.Memory (1913) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Edell Julie A., Staelin Richard. The information processing of pictures in print advertisements. J. Consumer Res. (1983) 10(June):45–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fazio Russell, Sorrentino Robert M., Higgins E. Thomas. How do attitudes guide behavior? The Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (1986) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 204–243Google Scholar
  • Fazio Russell, Hendrick C., Clark M. S. A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. Review of Personality and Social Psychology (1990) 11(Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) 74–97Google Scholar
  • Friedman Mildred. De Stijl: 1917–1931 Visions of Utopia (1982) (Abbeville Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Greene William H. Gender economics courses in liberal arts colleges: Further results. J. Econom. Ed. (1998) 29(4):291–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greene William H.Econometric Analysis (2000) 4th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Gupta Sunil. Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. J. Marketing Res. (1988) XXV(Nov):342–355CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haaijer Rinus, Kamakura Wagner, Wedel Michel. Response latency in the analysis of conjoint choice experiments. J. Marketing Res. (2000) XXXVII(August):376–382CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Halliday Jean. Ford finds sales leads productive. Advertising Age (2001) . http://www.adage.com/interactive/articles/20010122/ article1.html.Google Scholar
  • Hanssens Dominique M., Weitz Barton A. The effectiveness of industrial print advertisements across product categories. J. Marketing Res. (1980) XVII(August):294–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoffman Donna L., Novak Thomas P. How to acquire customers on the Web. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(3):179–185Google Scholar
  • Holbrook M. B., Lehmann D. R. Form versus content in predicting starch scores. J. Advertising Res. (1980) 20(4):53–62Google Scholar
  • Hoque Abeery Y., Lohse Gerald L. An information search cost perspective for designing interfaces for electronic commerce. J. Marketing Res. (1999) XXXVI(August):387–394CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller Kevin L. Memory and evaluation effects in competitive advertising environment. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 17(4):463–476CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotler Philip. Marketing Management: Analysis Planning, Implementation, and Control (1991) 7th ed.(Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Koufaris Marios. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(2):205–223LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kraut R., Mukhopadhyay T., Szczypula J., Kiesler S., Scherlis B. Information and communication: Alternative uses of the Internet in households. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 10:287–303LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Little John. Aggregate advertising models: The state of the art. Oper. Res. (1979) 27(4):629–667LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan Vijay, Muller Eitan. Advertising pulsing policies for generating awareness for new products. Marketing Sci. (1986) 5:89–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moe Wendy W., Fader Peter. Dynamic conversion behavior at e-commerce sites. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):326–335LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Naccarato John L., Neuendorf Kimberly A. Content analysis as a predictive methodology: Recall, readership, and evaluations of business-to-business print advertising. J. Advertising Res. (1998) 38(3):19–33Google Scholar
  • Naik Prasad A., Mantrala Murali K., Sawyer Alan G. Planning media schedules in the presence of dynamic advertising quality. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(3):214–235LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nerlove Marc, Arrow Kenneth. Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica (1962) 19(May):129–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer Jonathan W. Web site usability, design, and performance metrics. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(2):151–167LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Punj Girish N., Staelin Richard. A model of consumer information search behavior for new automobiles. J. Consumer Res. (1983) 9(4):366–381CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sasieni Maurice W. Optimal advertising expenditure. Managament Sci. (1971) 18(4, Part 2):64–72LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Straub Detmar W., Hoffman Donna L., Weber Bruce W., Steinfield Charles. Toward new metrics for net-enhanced organizations. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):227–238LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Strong E. C. The use of field experimental observations in estimating advertising recall. J. Marketing Res. (1974) 11(November):369–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Telang Rahul, Mukhopadhyay Tridas, Wilcox Ronald T. An empirical analysis of the antecedents of Internet search engine choice. (2001) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Tybjee Tyzoon T. Response time, conflict, and involvement in brand choice. J. Consumer Res. (1979) 6(December):295–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urban Glen L., Sultan Fareena, Qualls William J. Placing trust at the center of your Internet strategy. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2000) 42(1):39–48Google Scholar
  • Van Ophem Hans. Modeling selectivity in count-data models. J. Bus. Econom. Statist. (2000) 18(4):503–511CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu Jianan, Rangaswamy Arvind. A fuzzy set model of search and consideration with an application to an online market. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(3):411–434LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zufryden Fred. New film website promotion and box-office performance. J. Advertising Res. (2000) 40(1):55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.