When the Wait Isn’t So Bad: The Interacting Effects of Website Delay, Familiarity, and Breadth

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0073

References

  • Ajzen I. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Rev. Psych. (2001) 52:27–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barber R. E., Lucas H. C. System response time, operator productivity, and job satisfaction. Comm. ACM (1983) 26(11):972–986CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernard M. L. Examining the effects of hypertext shape on user performance. Usability News (2002) 4(2). http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/42/hypertext.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Blackmon M. H., Kitajima M., Polson P. G. Repairing usability problems identified by the cognitive walkthrough for the Web. Proc. SIGCHI (2003) Ft. Lauderdale, FL:497–504Association for Computing MachineryCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butler T. W. Computer response time and user performance. Proc. SIGCHI (1983) Boston, MA:58–63Association for Computing MachineryCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Card S. K., Moran T. P., Newell A.The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction (1983) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Card S. K., Pirolli P., Van Der Wege M., Morrison J. B., Reeder R. W., Schraedley P. K., Boshart J. Information scent as a driver of Web behavior graphs: Results of a protocol analysis method for Web usability. Proc. SIGCHI (2001) Seattle, WAAssociation for Computing MachineryCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chae M., Kim J. An empirical study on the breadth and depth tradeoffs in very small screens: Focusing on mobile internet phones. Amer. Conf. Comput. Inform. Systems (2003) Tampa, FL:2083–2093Association for Information SystemsGoogle Scholar
  • Chau P. Y. K., Au G., Tam K. Y. Impact of information presentation modes on online shopping: An empirical evaluation of a broadband interactive shopping service. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (2000) 10(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chi E. H., Pirolli P., Pitkow J. The scent of a site: A system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a web site. Proc. SIGCHI (2000) The Hague, The Netherlands:161–168Association for Computing MachineryCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chi E. H., Pirolli P., Chen K., Pitkow J. Using information scent to model user information needs and actions on the Web. Proc. SIGCHI (2001) Seattle, WAAssociation for Computing MachineryCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin J. P., Diehl V. A., Norman K. L. Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. Proc. SIGCHI (1988) Washington, D.C.:213–218Association for Computing MachineryCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chiravuri A., Peracchio L. Investigating online consumer behavior using thin slices of usability of web sites. Amer. Conf. Comput. Infom. Systems (2003) Tampa, FL:2105–2110Association for Information SystemsGoogle Scholar
  • Commerce Department Quarterly retail e-commerce sales: 1st quarter 2005. U.S. Department of Commerce News (May 20, 2005). (2005) . http://www.census.gov/mrts/www/ecomm.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):189–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dannenbring G. L. The effect of computer response time on user performance and satisfaction: A preliminary investigation. Behav. Res. Methods Instrumentation (1983) 15(2):213–216CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dellaert B. G. C., Kahn B. E. How tolerable is delay? Consumers’ evaluation of Internet websites after waiting. J. Interactive Marketing (2000) 13(1):41–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dumais S. T., Landauer T. K. Using examples to describe categories. Proc. SIGCHI (1983) Boston, MA:112–115Association for Computing MachineryCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards D. M., Hardman L., McAleese R. “Lost in hyperspace”: Cognitive mapping and navigation in a hypertext environment. Hypertext: Theory into Practice (1989) (Ablex Publishing, NJ) 90–105Ch. 7Google Scholar
  • Fishbein M., Ajzen I.Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Frese M., Frese M., Ulich E., Dzida W. A theory of control and complexity: Implications for software design and integration of the computer system into the work place. Psychological Issues of Human-Computer Interaction at the Work Place (1987) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 313–337Google Scholar
  • Galletta D., Henry R., McCoy S., Polak P. Web site delays: How slow can you go? J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2004) 5(1):1–28Google Scholar
  • Gauch S., Smith J. B. Search improvement via automatic query reformulation. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (1991) 9(3):249–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D., Straub D. W., Boudreau M. C. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2000) 4(7):1–77Google Scholar
  • Gould J. D., Lewis C. Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Comm. ACM (1985) 28(3):300–311CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartzel K. S. Understanding the role of client characteristics, expectations, and desires in packaged software satisfaction. (1999) . Unpublished doctoral thesis, Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Hoxmeier J. A., DiCesare C. System response time and user satisfaction: An experimental study of browser based applications. Amer. Conf. Comput. Inform. Systems (2000) Long Beach, CA(Association for Information Systems)140–145Google Scholar
  • Jacko J. A., Salvendy G. Hierarchical menu design: Breadth, depth, and task complexity. Perceptual Motor Skills (1996) 82(3):1187–1202CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jacko J. A., Salvendy G., Koubek R. J. Modeling of menu design in computerized work. Interacting Comput. (1995) 7(3):304–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson E. J., Payne J. W. Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Sci. (1985) 31(4):395–414LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Katz M. A., Byrne M. D. The effect of scent and breadth on use of site-specific search on e-commerce web sites. ACM Trans. Human-Comput. Interaction (2003) 10(3):198–220CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiger J. The depth/breadth trade-off in the design of menu-driven user interfaces. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. (1984) 20:201–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koblentz E. Web hosting partner keeps stone site rolling. Eweek (2000) October 30):27Google Scholar
  • Korthauer R. D., Koubek R. J. An empirical evaluation of knowledge, cognitive style, and structure upon the performance of a hypertext task. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Interaction (1994) 6(4):373–390CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhmann W. Experimental investigation of stress-inducing properties of system response times. Ergonomics (1989) 32(3):271–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Landauer T., Nachbar D. Selection from alphabetic and numeric menu trees using a touch screen: Breadth, depth, and width. Proc. SIGCHI (1985) New York:73–78Association for Computing MachineryCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson K., Czerwinski M. Web page design: Implications of memory, structure and scent for information retrieval. Proc. SIGCHI (1998) Los Angeles, CA:25–31Association for Computing MachineryCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lederer A. L., Maupin D. J., Sena M. P., Zhuang Y. The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems (2000) 29(3):269–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee A. T. Web usability: A review of the research. SIGCHI Bull. (1999) 31(1):38–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee E., MacGregor J. Minimizing user search time in menu retrieval systems. Human Factors (1985) 27:157–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lohse G. L., Spiller P. Electronic shopping. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(7):81–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Martin G. L., Corl K. G. System response time effects on user productivity. Behav. Inform. Tech. (1986) 5(1):3–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKinney V., Yoon K., Zahedi F. The measurement of Web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):296–315LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D. The depth/breadth tradeoff in hierarchical computer menus. Proc. 25th Annual Meeting Human Factors Soc. (1981) New York(Human Factors Society)296–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller R. B. Response time in man-computer conversational transactions. Proc. Fall Joint Comput. Conf. (1968) San Francisco, CA(AFIPS)267–277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muramatsu J., Pratt W. Transparent queries: Investigation users’ mental models of search engines. Proc. 24th Annual Internat. ACM SIGIR Conf. Res. Development Inform. Retrieval (2001) New Orleans, LA:217–224Association for Computing MachineryCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nah F., Sugumaran V. A study of Web users’ waiting time. Intelligent Support Systems Technology: Knowledge Management (2002) (IRM Press, Hershey, PA) 145–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nah F. H., Kim K., Khosrowpour M. World wide wait. Managing Web-Enabled Technologies in Organizations: A Global Perspective (2000) (Idea Publishing Group, Hershey, PA) 146–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R. Educational needs as perceived by IS and end-user personnel: A survey of knowledge and skill requirements. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(4):503–525CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neter J., Kutner M. H., Nachtsheim C. J., Wasserman W.Applied Linear Statistical Models (1996) 4th ed.(Irwin Publishers, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Nielsen J. The need for speed. (1997) . http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9703a.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Nielsen J. Who commits the “top ten mistakes” of Web design? (1999a) . http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990516.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Nielsen J. The top ten new mistakes of Web design. (1999b) . http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990530.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Norman K., Chin J. The effect of tree structure on search in a hierarchical menu selection system. Behav. Inform. Tech. (1988) 7(1):51–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Olston C., Chi E. H. ScentTrails: Integrating browsing and searching on the Web. ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interaction (2003) 10(3):177–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Otter M., Johnson H. Lost in hyperspace: Metrics and mental models. Interacting Comput. (2000) 13:1–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paap K. R., Roske-Hofstrand R. J., Helander M. Design of menus. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (1988) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 205–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pardue J. H., Landry J. P. Evaluation of alternative interface designs for e-tail shopping: An empirical study of three generalized hierarchical navigation schemes. Amer. Conf. Comput. Inform. Systems (2001) Boston, MA(Association for Information Systems)1335–1337Google Scholar
  • Parkinson S., Hill M., Sisson N., Viera C. Effects of breadth, depth, and number of responses on computer menu search performance. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. (1988) 28:683–692CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pirolli P., Card S. Information foraging. Psych. Rev. (1999) 106(4):643–675CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pitkow C., Kehoe J., Rogers J. GVU’s 9th WWW user survey. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA. (1998) . http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user_surveys/survey-1998-04/reports/Google Scholar
  • Polak P. The direct and interactive effects of web site delay length, delay variability, and feedback on user attitudes, performance, and intentions. (2002) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Ramsay J., Barbesi A., Preece J. A psychological investigation of long retrieval times on the World Wide Web. Interacting Comput. (1998) 10(1):77–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose G. M., Straub D. The effect of download time on consumer attitude toward the e-service retailer. e-Service J. (2001) 1(1):55–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rose G., Khoo M., Straub D. W. Current technological impediments to business-to-consumer electronic commerce. Comm. AIS (1999) 1(Article 16):1–74Google Scholar
  • Rose G. M., Lees J., Meuter M. A refined view of download time impacts on e-consumer attitudes and patronage intentions toward e-retailers. Internat. J. Media Management (2001) 3(2):105–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sawasdichair N., Poggenpohl S. User purposes and information-seeking behaviors in Web-based media: A user-centered approach to information design on websites. Sympos. Designing Interactive Systems. Proc. Conf. Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (2002) London, England(ACM Press, New York) 201–212Google Scholar
  • Schwartz J. P., Norman K. L. The importance of item distinctiveness on performance using a menu selection system. Behav. Inform. Tech. (1986) 5(2):173–182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sears A., Jacko J. A. Understanding the relation between network quality of service and the usability of distributed multimedia documents. Human-Comput. Interaction (2000) 15(1):43–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sears A., Jacko J. A., Dubach E. M. International aspects of WWW usability and the role of high-end graphical enhancements. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Interaction (2000) 12(2):243–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Selvidge P. Examining tolerance for online delays. Usability News (2003) 5(1). http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/51/delaytime.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Shneiderman B.Designing the User Interface (1998) (Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A. Invariants of human behavior. Annual Rev. Psych. (1990) 41:1–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Somberg B., Picardi M. Locus of the information familiarity effect in the search of computer menus. Proc. 27th Annual Meeting Human Factors Soc. (1983) Norfolk, VA:826–830CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Song J., Zahedi F. Web design in e-commerce: A theory and empirical analysis. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2001) New Orleans, LA:205–220Session T3.3Google Scholar
  • Taylor S., Todd P. A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6:144–176LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thuring M., Hannemann J., Haake J. M. Hypermedia and cognition: Designing for comprehension. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(8):57–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Todd P., Benbasat I. Evaluating the impact of DSS, cognitive effort, and incentives on strategy selection. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(4):356–374LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Torkzadeh G., Dhillon G. Measuring factors that influence the success of internet commerce. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(2):187–204LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Turban E., Gehrke D. Determinants of e-commerce website (sic). Human Systems Management (2000) 19:111–120Google Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Voich D.Comparative Empirical Analysis of Cultural Values and Perceptions of Political Economy Issues (1995) (Praeger, Westport, Connecticut) Google Scholar
  • Wonnacott L. When user experience is at risk, Tier 1 providers can help. Infoworld (2000) November 6):76Google Scholar
  • Zaphiris P., Mtei L. Depth vs. breadth in the arrangement of Web links. University of Maryland, College Park, MD. (1997) . http://www.otal.umd.edu/SHORE/Google Scholar
  • The need for speedZona Research Study (1999) . Press release http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990530.htmlGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.